A single-surgeon experience with the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow across 56 cases

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.204
John J. Heifner MD , Gagan Grewal MD , Christopher J. Castagno MD , Gil Gontre MD
{"title":"A single-surgeon experience with the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow across 56 cases","authors":"John J. Heifner MD ,&nbsp;Gagan Grewal MD ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Castagno MD ,&nbsp;Gil Gontre MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recurrent instability continues to plague outcomes of elbow trauma. Adjuvant stabilization—whether internal or external—is intended to acutely stabilize the elbow and off-load the repair construct(s) during early mobilization. Our objective was to report clinical outcomes for a single-surgeon consecutive series using the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) of the elbow. Furthermore, we intend to describe technical points that have been gleaned from the experience which may provide guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective follow-up was performed for cases of elbow instability treated with the IJS (Skeletal Dynamics, Miami, Florida, USA) from 2016-2023 with a minimum requirement of 6 months of follow-up. Clinical outcomes and complications including recurrent instability were compiled.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 87 potential cases, 56 met the inclusion criteria. Simple dislocations (30%) and terrible triad injury (21%) were the most common injury patterns. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 81 and the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 22.5. Recurrent instability occurred in 5.3% of cases. The mean time to removal was 21.1 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our utilization of the IJS of the elbow has evolved from simple dislocations to complex instability cases. Results demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and revision. The ability for early mobilization was a critical determinant for using an IJS in these cases. This advantage carried particular importance in cases that presented subacutely following an extended course of immobilization. Our protocol for removal timing is applied on a case-by-case basis and involves identification of sufficient rehabilitation and clinical stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 244-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324003967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recurrent instability continues to plague outcomes of elbow trauma. Adjuvant stabilization—whether internal or external—is intended to acutely stabilize the elbow and off-load the repair construct(s) during early mobilization. Our objective was to report clinical outcomes for a single-surgeon consecutive series using the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) of the elbow. Furthermore, we intend to describe technical points that have been gleaned from the experience which may provide guidance.

Methods

A retrospective follow-up was performed for cases of elbow instability treated with the IJS (Skeletal Dynamics, Miami, Florida, USA) from 2016-2023 with a minimum requirement of 6 months of follow-up. Clinical outcomes and complications including recurrent instability were compiled.

Results

Of 87 potential cases, 56 met the inclusion criteria. Simple dislocations (30%) and terrible triad injury (21%) were the most common injury patterns. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 81 and the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 22.5. Recurrent instability occurred in 5.3% of cases. The mean time to removal was 21.1 weeks.

Discussion

Our utilization of the IJS of the elbow has evolved from simple dislocations to complex instability cases. Results demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and revision. The ability for early mobilization was a critical determinant for using an IJS in these cases. This advantage carried particular importance in cases that presented subacutely following an extended course of immobilization. Our protocol for removal timing is applied on a case-by-case basis and involves identification of sufficient rehabilitation and clinical stability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
56例肘关节内固定的单外科手术经验。
背景:复发性不稳定继续困扰肘部创伤的预后。辅助稳定-无论是内部还是外部-旨在在早期活动期间快速稳定肘关节并卸下修复结构。我们的目的是报告单外科医生连续使用肘部内关节稳定器(IJS)的临床结果。此外,我们打算描述从经验中收集到的技术要点,这可能会提供指导。方法:回顾性随访2016-2023年IJS治疗肘关节不稳病例(美国迈阿密骨骼动力学公司),随访时间至少为6个月。汇总临床结果和并发症,包括复发性不稳定。结果:87例潜在病例中56例符合纳入标准。单纯脱位(30%)和可怕的三联性损伤(21%)是最常见的损伤模式。Mayo肘部表现评分平均为81分,手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分平均为22.5分。5.3%的病例发生复发性不稳定。平均移除时间为21.1周。讨论:我们对肘关节IJS的应用已经从简单的脱位发展到复杂的不稳定病例。结果显示了令人满意的临床结果,复发不稳定和翻修率低。在这些病例中,早期活动的能力是使用IJS的关键决定因素。这一优势在长时间固定后出现亚急性的病例中尤为重要。我们的移除时间方案是在个案的基础上应用的,包括充分的康复和临床稳定性的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome score is a strong predictor of shoulder pain and function in glenohumeral osteoarthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy Timing of corticosteroid injection within 1 year prior to rotator cuff repair was not associated with increased risk of repair failure A multiplanar humeral head osteotomy results in significantly improved bone compression strength compared to a standard humeral head osteotomy in stemless total shoulder arthroplasty Translation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version Functional outcomes and complications of distal humerus hemiarthroplasty performed in acute versus salvage cases: a systematic meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1