Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a custom baseplate for severe glenoid deficiency

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.013
Katsumasa Nakazawa MD , Tomoya Manaka MD, PhD , Yukihide Minoda MD, PhD , Nobuyasu Ochiai MD, PhD , Yasuhiro Nakane MD , Yoichi Ito MD, PhD , Yoshihiro Hirakawa MD, PhD , Ryosuke Iio MD , Kenta Inagaki MD , Hiroaki Nakamura MD, PhD
{"title":"Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a custom baseplate for severe glenoid deficiency","authors":"Katsumasa Nakazawa MD ,&nbsp;Tomoya Manaka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukihide Minoda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Ochiai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Nakane MD ,&nbsp;Yoichi Ito MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Hirakawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ryosuke Iio MD ,&nbsp;Kenta Inagaki MD ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nakamura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glenoid bone deficiency can lead to early component loosening and implant failure during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Recently, the glenoid Vault Reconstruction System (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), a computer-aided design ot computer-assisted manufacturing system, was developed, with good clinical outcomes, including no radiographic loosening. This study examined the postoperative accuracy of glenoid component placement using this system at three different facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine patients undergoing rTSA with vault reconstruction system performed by three board-certified, fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at three different institutions between August 2020 and January 2023 were included. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography was performed, and glenoid inclination and version were measured using a postoperative three-dimensional evaluation system. Surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were also measured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The range of errors of glenoid inclination and version were 3.5 ± 2.5° (0.4–8.3) and 3.2 ± 2.2° (0.4–6.7), respectively. In primary cases, the error ranges of both glenoid inclination and version were within 5° in six of seven cases (85.7%). In revision cases, both glenoid inclination and version were within 10°. The mean operative time was 131.4 ± 48.9 (80–206) min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 161.1 ± 94.2 (30–300) ml; there were no intraoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the present study, the placement position was good in primary and revision cases, making the placement of the glenoid component of the rTSA using vault reconstruction system in cases of glenoid bone deficiency highly reproducible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 206-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Glenoid bone deficiency can lead to early component loosening and implant failure during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Recently, the glenoid Vault Reconstruction System (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), a computer-aided design ot computer-assisted manufacturing system, was developed, with good clinical outcomes, including no radiographic loosening. This study examined the postoperative accuracy of glenoid component placement using this system at three different facilities.

Methods

Nine patients undergoing rTSA with vault reconstruction system performed by three board-certified, fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at three different institutions between August 2020 and January 2023 were included. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography was performed, and glenoid inclination and version were measured using a postoperative three-dimensional evaluation system. Surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were also measured.

Results

The range of errors of glenoid inclination and version were 3.5 ± 2.5° (0.4–8.3) and 3.2 ± 2.2° (0.4–6.7), respectively. In primary cases, the error ranges of both glenoid inclination and version were within 5° in six of seven cases (85.7%). In revision cases, both glenoid inclination and version were within 10°. The mean operative time was 131.4 ± 48.9 (80–206) min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 161.1 ± 94.2 (30–300) ml; there were no intraoperative complications.

Conclusion

In the present study, the placement position was good in primary and revision cases, making the placement of the glenoid component of the rTSA using vault reconstruction system in cases of glenoid bone deficiency highly reproducible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Denervation procedure of the lateral epicondyle for refractory lateral epicondylitis Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures Role of three-dimensional computed tomography with humeral subtraction in assessing anteromedial facet coronoid fractures Medial elbow approaches for coronoid fractures: risk to the ulnar nerve Minimally invasive needle tenotomy vs. platelet rich plasma injection in the treatment of chronic elbow epicondylitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1