Efficacy of pectoralis nerve blocks I & II with liposomal bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective breast reduction procedures: A retrospective study

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY JPRAS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2024.12.006
Anup Palak Sanghvi , Ivette Klumb , Charmi Kanani , Amol Karmarkar , Michael Kazior
{"title":"Efficacy of pectoralis nerve blocks I & II with liposomal bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective breast reduction procedures: A retrospective study","authors":"Anup Palak Sanghvi ,&nbsp;Ivette Klumb ,&nbsp;Charmi Kanani ,&nbsp;Amol Karmarkar ,&nbsp;Michael Kazior","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The pectoral nerve (PECs) block I and II nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine (LB, Exparel) are used for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery, but evidence on efficacy for breast reduction is limited. We examined the effect of the PECS I and II blocks with LB on perioperative opioid use and pain scores compared to no block and blocks with plain local anesthetic (LA). We hypothesized that patients receiving a block with LB would require lower opioid amounts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort analysis included 120 patients undergoing breast reduction from 2011-2023. Patients received: no block, PECs block with plain LA, or PECs block with LB. Primary outcomes were intraoperative, Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), and outpatient opioid requirements. The secondary outcomes were PACU pain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty patients had no block, twenty-six received plain LA block, and fifty-four received LB block. For intraoperative opioids, LB block significantly lowered use compared to no block. PACU opioid use showed no differences between groups. For outpatient opioids, both LB and plain LA blocks significantly lowered use compared to no block. No significant pain score differences were found between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients receiving the PECS block had decreased outpatient narcotic requirements compared to those patients who did not get the block. Patients receiving PECS block with LB had the further benefit of having decreased intraoperative narcotic requirements compared to the other groups. This highlights the potential benefit of performing the PECS block for patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The pectoral nerve (PECs) block I and II nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine (LB, Exparel) are used for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery, but evidence on efficacy for breast reduction is limited. We examined the effect of the PECS I and II blocks with LB on perioperative opioid use and pain scores compared to no block and blocks with plain local anesthetic (LA). We hypothesized that patients receiving a block with LB would require lower opioid amounts.

Methods

This retrospective cohort analysis included 120 patients undergoing breast reduction from 2011-2023. Patients received: no block, PECs block with plain LA, or PECs block with LB. Primary outcomes were intraoperative, Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), and outpatient opioid requirements. The secondary outcomes were PACU pain scores.

Results

Forty patients had no block, twenty-six received plain LA block, and fifty-four received LB block. For intraoperative opioids, LB block significantly lowered use compared to no block. PACU opioid use showed no differences between groups. For outpatient opioids, both LB and plain LA blocks significantly lowered use compared to no block. No significant pain score differences were found between groups.

Conclusions

Patients receiving the PECS block had decreased outpatient narcotic requirements compared to those patients who did not get the block. Patients receiving PECS block with LB had the further benefit of having decreased intraoperative narcotic requirements compared to the other groups. This highlights the potential benefit of performing the PECS block for patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JPRAS Open
JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.
期刊最新文献
Anatomy and biomechanics of the scapholunate ligament in Vietnamese cadavers Rare presentation and resection of giant cell tumor invading the middle ear and skull base: A case report Orthoplastic surgery research: Three decades of growth and future directions Prevalence of Silicone Lymphadenopathy in Women with Breast Implants: A single-center retrospective study Microsurgery influences breast reconstruction and its timing in patients with breast cancer: A population-based multilevel analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1