Development and psychometric validation of the frontline health workers’ occupational risk and characteristics in emergencies index (FORCE-index) – The covid Hospital cohort study

IF 1.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100582
Synne Øien Stensland , Kristina Bondjers , John-Anker Zwart , Leiv Arne Rosseland , Dan Atar , Jan Olav Christensen , Dagfinn Matre , Kristin Alve Glad , Tore Wentzel-Larsen , Hilde Wøien , Grete Dyb
{"title":"Development and psychometric validation of the frontline health workers’ occupational risk and characteristics in emergencies index (FORCE-index) – The covid Hospital cohort study","authors":"Synne Øien Stensland ,&nbsp;Kristina Bondjers ,&nbsp;John-Anker Zwart ,&nbsp;Leiv Arne Rosseland ,&nbsp;Dan Atar ,&nbsp;Jan Olav Christensen ,&nbsp;Dagfinn Matre ,&nbsp;Kristin Alve Glad ,&nbsp;Tore Wentzel-Larsen ,&nbsp;Hilde Wøien ,&nbsp;Grete Dyb","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>A lack of tools for the systematic identification of frontline health workers' changing occupational risks, characteristics, and needs, poses a major barrier to supporting vital personnel to stay in practice through health emergencies and beyond. The current study reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Frontline health workers’ Occupational Risk and Characteristics in Emergencies index (FORCE-index).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The Covid hospital study is a large, multisite, four-wave, open cohort study of frontline health workers responding to the first four waves of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>2496 frontline health workers responded to questionnaires assessing various aspects of their work environment. Using exploratory factor analysis, we estimated the latent structure of the FORCE-index at the first and second waves. This structure was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis at the third and fourth waves. The internal consistency of the instrument's subscales (e.g., factors) was evaluated using omega reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and mean inter-item correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A nine-factor solution provided best fit to the data. These factors mapped onto the following aspects of the work environment; competency, stress management, familiarity, workload manageability, work performance, infection safety, personal protective equipment, social safety, and social support. Internal consistency for the full FORCE-index and the nine factors was satisfactory.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The initial psychometric validation indicates that the FORCE-index is a valid measure which can be used by health authorities, services, and institutions to adequately and systematically assess central aspects of frontline health workers’ work environment that are commonly challenged in health emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535225000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

A lack of tools for the systematic identification of frontline health workers' changing occupational risks, characteristics, and needs, poses a major barrier to supporting vital personnel to stay in practice through health emergencies and beyond. The current study reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Frontline health workers’ Occupational Risk and Characteristics in Emergencies index (FORCE-index).

Study design

The Covid hospital study is a large, multisite, four-wave, open cohort study of frontline health workers responding to the first four waves of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022).

Methods

2496 frontline health workers responded to questionnaires assessing various aspects of their work environment. Using exploratory factor analysis, we estimated the latent structure of the FORCE-index at the first and second waves. This structure was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis at the third and fourth waves. The internal consistency of the instrument's subscales (e.g., factors) was evaluated using omega reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and mean inter-item correlation.

Results

A nine-factor solution provided best fit to the data. These factors mapped onto the following aspects of the work environment; competency, stress management, familiarity, workload manageability, work performance, infection safety, personal protective equipment, social safety, and social support. Internal consistency for the full FORCE-index and the nine factors was satisfactory.

Conclusions

The initial psychometric validation indicates that the FORCE-index is a valid measure which can be used by health authorities, services, and institutions to adequately and systematically assess central aspects of frontline health workers’ work environment that are commonly challenged in health emergencies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线卫生工作者突发事件职业风险与特征指数(FORCE-index)的编制与心理测量学验证——基于新冠肺炎医院队列研究
目标:缺乏系统识别一线卫生工作者不断变化的职业风险、特征和需求的工具,对支持关键人员在突发卫生事件及以后继续从事工作构成了重大障碍。本研究报告了一线卫生工作者突发事件职业风险与特征指数(FORCE-index)的编制及心理测量学评价。研究设计:Covid医院研究是一项大型、多地点、四波、开放队列研究,研究对象是应对Covid -19大流行前四波(2020-2022年)的一线卫生工作者。方法:2496名一线卫生工作者对其工作环境的各个方面进行问卷调查。利用探索性因子分析,我们估计了第一波和第二波force指数的潜在结构。在第三波和第四波使用验证性因子分析评估该结构。使用ω信度、Cronbach's alpha系数和平均项目间相关性来评估仪器的子量表(例如,因子)的内部一致性。结果:九因子方案与数据拟合最佳。这些因素反映了工作环境的以下几个方面:能力、压力管理、熟悉程度、工作量可管理性、工作表现、感染安全、个人防护设备、社会安全和社会支持。全force指数与9个因子的内部一致性令人满意。结论:最初的心理测量验证表明force指数是一种有效的测量方法,卫生当局、服务部门和机构可以使用它来充分和系统地评估一线卫生工作者工作环境的核心方面,这些方面在突发卫生事件中通常受到挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Short and disrupted sleep is related to perceptions of neighborhood in pregnant African American women of low socioeconomic status Utilising unsupervised machine learning to predict outbreaks of respiratory tract infections in acute Irish hospitals (2016-2021) A propensity score-matched study including 250,000 patients with Factor V Leiden shows significantly increased mortality in comparison with individuals without thrombophilia How can integrated neighbourhood teams (INTs) tackle health and care inequalities? A policy evidence brief Mobilizing community assets to address health equity: Evaluation of the Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) project in Kansas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1