Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can influence study outcomes related to total shoulder arthroplasty

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.191
Junho Song MD, Jennifer Yu BS, Avanish Yendluri BS, William A. Ranson MD, Nikan K. Namiri MD, John J. Corvi MD, David E. Kantrowitz MD, Thomas Boucher MD, Leesa M. Galatz MD, Paul J. Cagle MD, Bradford O. Parsons MD, Robert L. Parisien MD
{"title":"Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can influence study outcomes related to total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Junho Song MD,&nbsp;Jennifer Yu BS,&nbsp;Avanish Yendluri BS,&nbsp;William A. Ranson MD,&nbsp;Nikan K. Namiri MD,&nbsp;John J. Corvi MD,&nbsp;David E. Kantrowitz MD,&nbsp;Thomas Boucher MD,&nbsp;Leesa M. Galatz MD,&nbsp;Paul J. Cagle MD,&nbsp;Bradford O. Parsons MD,&nbsp;Robert L. Parisien MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Numerous studies have investigated the outcomes of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, some patients originally planned for outpatient surgery may unexpectedly require inpatient hospital stay, which can obscure the distinction of “outpatient” and “inpatient” cases. Ultimately, this inconsistent classification of “outpatient” surgery may influence study results. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the differences in definition of “outpatient” surgery (hospital-defined outpatient [HDO] vs. same-day discharge [SDD]), and (2) to study the effect of different definitions on 30-day outcomes following TSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent TSA between 2011 and 2021. HDO cases were identified based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program inpatient or outpatient variable, and SDD cases were identified based on length of stay = 0. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between HDO and SDD cohorts. Propensity score was utilized to match each HDO and SDD case with one inpatient case without replacement. Two distinct sets of multivariate analyses, using Poisson regressions with robust error variance, were performed to calculate the risks of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications for HDO and SDD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 30,458 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 6711 HDO and 4490 SDD cases. 3501 out of the 6711 (52.2%) HDO patients required at least one night of inpatient hospital stay (length of stay &gt;0). Between 2011 and 2021, the annual incidence of HDO TSA rose from 4.1% to 61.6% of all TSA cases, and the incidence of SDD TSA increased from 2.0% to 34.1% of all TSA cases. Compared to SDD, HDO was associated with female sex, higher body mass index, functional dependence, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3, longer operation time, and nonhome discharge. After controlling for potential confounders, inpatient TSA was associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission and reoperation compared with HDO cases, while morbidity and individual complication rates were similar. However, compared with SDD patients, inpatient TSA was associated with higher rates of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and deep venous thrombosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can lead to significantly different study outcomes related to TSA. Future investigations on this topic should maintain consistency in the definition of “outpatient” surgery. Accurate data on the risk factors for adverse events after TSA are critical for appropriate patient selection and improving surgical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 163-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324003839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies have investigated the outcomes of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, some patients originally planned for outpatient surgery may unexpectedly require inpatient hospital stay, which can obscure the distinction of “outpatient” and “inpatient” cases. Ultimately, this inconsistent classification of “outpatient” surgery may influence study results. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the differences in definition of “outpatient” surgery (hospital-defined outpatient [HDO] vs. same-day discharge [SDD]), and (2) to study the effect of different definitions on 30-day outcomes following TSA.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent TSA between 2011 and 2021. HDO cases were identified based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program inpatient or outpatient variable, and SDD cases were identified based on length of stay = 0. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between HDO and SDD cohorts. Propensity score was utilized to match each HDO and SDD case with one inpatient case without replacement. Two distinct sets of multivariate analyses, using Poisson regressions with robust error variance, were performed to calculate the risks of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications for HDO and SDD.

Results

A total of 30,458 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 6711 HDO and 4490 SDD cases. 3501 out of the 6711 (52.2%) HDO patients required at least one night of inpatient hospital stay (length of stay >0). Between 2011 and 2021, the annual incidence of HDO TSA rose from 4.1% to 61.6% of all TSA cases, and the incidence of SDD TSA increased from 2.0% to 34.1% of all TSA cases. Compared to SDD, HDO was associated with female sex, higher body mass index, functional dependence, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3, longer operation time, and nonhome discharge. After controlling for potential confounders, inpatient TSA was associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission and reoperation compared with HDO cases, while morbidity and individual complication rates were similar. However, compared with SDD patients, inpatient TSA was associated with higher rates of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and deep venous thrombosis.

Conclusion

Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can lead to significantly different study outcomes related to TSA. Future investigations on this topic should maintain consistency in the definition of “outpatient” surgery. Accurate data on the risk factors for adverse events after TSA are critical for appropriate patient selection and improving surgical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Denervation procedure of the lateral epicondyle for refractory lateral epicondylitis Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures Role of three-dimensional computed tomography with humeral subtraction in assessing anteromedial facet coronoid fractures Medial elbow approaches for coronoid fractures: risk to the ulnar nerve Minimally invasive needle tenotomy vs. platelet rich plasma injection in the treatment of chronic elbow epicondylitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1