Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can influence study outcomes related to total shoulder arthroplasty

IF 2 Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.191
Junho Song MD, Jennifer Yu BS, Avanish Yendluri BS, William A. Ranson MD, Nikan K. Namiri MD, John J. Corvi MD, David E. Kantrowitz MD, Thomas Boucher MD, Leesa M. Galatz MD, Paul J. Cagle MD, Bradford O. Parsons MD, Robert L. Parisien MD
{"title":"Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can influence study outcomes related to total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Junho Song MD,&nbsp;Jennifer Yu BS,&nbsp;Avanish Yendluri BS,&nbsp;William A. Ranson MD,&nbsp;Nikan K. Namiri MD,&nbsp;John J. Corvi MD,&nbsp;David E. Kantrowitz MD,&nbsp;Thomas Boucher MD,&nbsp;Leesa M. Galatz MD,&nbsp;Paul J. Cagle MD,&nbsp;Bradford O. Parsons MD,&nbsp;Robert L. Parisien MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Numerous studies have investigated the outcomes of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, some patients originally planned for outpatient surgery may unexpectedly require inpatient hospital stay, which can obscure the distinction of “outpatient” and “inpatient” cases. Ultimately, this inconsistent classification of “outpatient” surgery may influence study results. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the differences in definition of “outpatient” surgery (hospital-defined outpatient [HDO] vs. same-day discharge [SDD]), and (2) to study the effect of different definitions on 30-day outcomes following TSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent TSA between 2011 and 2021. HDO cases were identified based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program inpatient or outpatient variable, and SDD cases were identified based on length of stay = 0. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between HDO and SDD cohorts. Propensity score was utilized to match each HDO and SDD case with one inpatient case without replacement. Two distinct sets of multivariate analyses, using Poisson regressions with robust error variance, were performed to calculate the risks of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications for HDO and SDD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 30,458 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 6711 HDO and 4490 SDD cases. 3501 out of the 6711 (52.2%) HDO patients required at least one night of inpatient hospital stay (length of stay &gt;0). Between 2011 and 2021, the annual incidence of HDO TSA rose from 4.1% to 61.6% of all TSA cases, and the incidence of SDD TSA increased from 2.0% to 34.1% of all TSA cases. Compared to SDD, HDO was associated with female sex, higher body mass index, functional dependence, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3, longer operation time, and nonhome discharge. After controlling for potential confounders, inpatient TSA was associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission and reoperation compared with HDO cases, while morbidity and individual complication rates were similar. However, compared with SDD patients, inpatient TSA was associated with higher rates of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and deep venous thrombosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can lead to significantly different study outcomes related to TSA. Future investigations on this topic should maintain consistency in the definition of “outpatient” surgery. Accurate data on the risk factors for adverse events after TSA are critical for appropriate patient selection and improving surgical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 163-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324003839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies have investigated the outcomes of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, some patients originally planned for outpatient surgery may unexpectedly require inpatient hospital stay, which can obscure the distinction of “outpatient” and “inpatient” cases. Ultimately, this inconsistent classification of “outpatient” surgery may influence study results. The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the differences in definition of “outpatient” surgery (hospital-defined outpatient [HDO] vs. same-day discharge [SDD]), and (2) to study the effect of different definitions on 30-day outcomes following TSA.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent TSA between 2011 and 2021. HDO cases were identified based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program inpatient or outpatient variable, and SDD cases were identified based on length of stay = 0. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between HDO and SDD cohorts. Propensity score was utilized to match each HDO and SDD case with one inpatient case without replacement. Two distinct sets of multivariate analyses, using Poisson regressions with robust error variance, were performed to calculate the risks of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications for HDO and SDD.

Results

A total of 30,458 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 6711 HDO and 4490 SDD cases. 3501 out of the 6711 (52.2%) HDO patients required at least one night of inpatient hospital stay (length of stay >0). Between 2011 and 2021, the annual incidence of HDO TSA rose from 4.1% to 61.6% of all TSA cases, and the incidence of SDD TSA increased from 2.0% to 34.1% of all TSA cases. Compared to SDD, HDO was associated with female sex, higher body mass index, functional dependence, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3, longer operation time, and nonhome discharge. After controlling for potential confounders, inpatient TSA was associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission and reoperation compared with HDO cases, while morbidity and individual complication rates were similar. However, compared with SDD patients, inpatient TSA was associated with higher rates of readmission, reoperation, morbidity, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and deep venous thrombosis.

Conclusion

Definitional differences in “outpatient” surgery can lead to significantly different study outcomes related to TSA. Future investigations on this topic should maintain consistency in the definition of “outpatient” surgery. Accurate data on the risk factors for adverse events after TSA are critical for appropriate patient selection and improving surgical outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“门诊”手术的定义差异可能影响与全肩关节置换术相关的研究结果。
背景:大量研究调查了门诊全肩关节置换术(TSA)的结果。然而,一些原本计划进行门诊手术的患者可能会意外地需要住院,这可能会模糊“门诊”和“住院”病例的区别。最终,这种不一致的“门诊”手术分类可能会影响研究结果。本研究的目的是:(1)表征“门诊”手术定义的差异(医院定义门诊[HDO]与当日出院[SDD]),以及(2)研究不同定义对TSA后30天预后的影响。方法:查询美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中2011年至2021年间接受TSA的患者。HDO病例根据国家外科质量改进计划住院或门诊变量确定,SDD病例根据住院时间= 0确定。比较HDO组和SDD组的人口学和临床特征。使用倾向评分将每个HDO和SDD病例与1例未更换的住院病例进行匹配。两组不同的多变量分析,使用具有稳健误差方差的泊松回归,计算HDO和SDD的再入院、再手术、发病率和并发症的风险。结果:30458例患者符合纳入标准,其中HDO 6711例,SDD 4490例。6711名HDO患者中有3501名(52.2%)需要至少住院一晚(住院时间)。2011 - 2021年,HDO TSA的年发病率从4.1%上升到61.6%,SDD TSA的年发病率从2.0%上升到34.1%。与SDD相比,HDO与女性、较高的体重指数、功能依赖、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、充血性心力衰竭、高血压、美国麻醉医师学会≥3级、较长的手术时间和非家庭出院相关。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,与HDO病例相比,住院患者TSA与30天再入院和再手术的风险增加有关,而发病率和个人并发症发生率相似。然而,与SDD患者相比,住院TSA患者的再入院率、再手术率、发病率、肺炎、肺栓塞、心肌梗死和深静脉血栓形成率更高。结论:“门诊”手术的定义差异可导致TSA相关研究结果的显著差异。未来对这一课题的研究应保持“门诊”手术定义的一致性。TSA后不良事件危险因素的准确数据对于适当的患者选择和改善手术结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Suture tension band fixation reduces hardware complications in olecranon fractures: a comparative study Does excessive lateralization influence tuberosity healing in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures? Evaluation of muscle strength recovery following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus superior capsular reconstruction using tensor fascia lata graft in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears Exploratory anchor-derived six-month improvement thresholds for sleep quality and pain after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Short-term clinical and radiological outcome of the uncemented isoelastic monoblock Affinis Glenoid vitamys in stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1