Description of a new surgical approach for elbow arthroplasty: Selective Triceps-On Medial Paraolecranon (STOMP) approach

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.003
Carlos Prada MD , Sirat Khan MBBS, PhD , Thomas Goetz MD , Bashar Alolabi MD, MSc
{"title":"Description of a new surgical approach for elbow arthroplasty: Selective Triceps-On Medial Paraolecranon (STOMP) approach","authors":"Carlos Prada MD ,&nbsp;Sirat Khan MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Goetz MD ,&nbsp;Bashar Alolabi MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgical approaches for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) are broadly divided into two groups; “triceps-off” and “triceps-on” approaches. Traditional “triceps-off” approaches provide excellent visualization for TEA; however, they carry a risk of triceps failure and require triceps protecting rehabilitation protocols. Triceps-on approaches have the advantage of preservation of triceps function yet present technical challenges for access to and preparation of the bony surfaces of the proximal ulna and radius. We present here the operative technique, indications, and initial outcomes of a novel Selective Triceps-On Medial Paraolecranon (STOMP) approach for TEA, which allows both preservation of the triceps function and excellent exposure to the proximal ulna with minimal risk to the ulnar nerve.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A two center, retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing primary TEA, hemiarthroplasty, or revision elbow arthroplasties using the STOMP approach in the practice of the senior authors between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Patient data, including admission demographics and diagnoses were collated. Outcome measures were collected from patient charts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 37 elbow arthroplasties in 35 patients were performed with the STOMP approach during the reviewed period, of which 27 patients (77%) were female. Thirty-two arthroplasties were primary cases (86%), and 5 (14%) were revision cases. The main indications leading to elbow arthroplasty was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 18, 49%) followed by primary or secondary elbow osteoarthritis (n = 9, 24%) and distal humeral fracture (n = 7, 19%). There were 7 postoperative complications (19%). Five patients (14%) developed elbow stiffness, one patient a postoperative olecranon fracture (n = 1, 3%) and one patient had an ulnar nerve injury with incomplete resolution but that did not warrant surgical treatment (n = 1, 3%). A reoperation was required in 3 patients (9%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The STOMP approach is a safe approach for elbow arthroplasty surgery. It does not detach the triceps and we believe it offers improved exposure and safety compared to other triceps-on techniques. Furthermore, this approach allows excellent surgical access to the coronoid, olecranon, and ulnar canal with low midterm complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 320-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgical approaches for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) are broadly divided into two groups; “triceps-off” and “triceps-on” approaches. Traditional “triceps-off” approaches provide excellent visualization for TEA; however, they carry a risk of triceps failure and require triceps protecting rehabilitation protocols. Triceps-on approaches have the advantage of preservation of triceps function yet present technical challenges for access to and preparation of the bony surfaces of the proximal ulna and radius. We present here the operative technique, indications, and initial outcomes of a novel Selective Triceps-On Medial Paraolecranon (STOMP) approach for TEA, which allows both preservation of the triceps function and excellent exposure to the proximal ulna with minimal risk to the ulnar nerve.

Methods

A two center, retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing primary TEA, hemiarthroplasty, or revision elbow arthroplasties using the STOMP approach in the practice of the senior authors between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Patient data, including admission demographics and diagnoses were collated. Outcome measures were collected from patient charts.

Results

A total of 37 elbow arthroplasties in 35 patients were performed with the STOMP approach during the reviewed period, of which 27 patients (77%) were female. Thirty-two arthroplasties were primary cases (86%), and 5 (14%) were revision cases. The main indications leading to elbow arthroplasty was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 18, 49%) followed by primary or secondary elbow osteoarthritis (n = 9, 24%) and distal humeral fracture (n = 7, 19%). There were 7 postoperative complications (19%). Five patients (14%) developed elbow stiffness, one patient a postoperative olecranon fracture (n = 1, 3%) and one patient had an ulnar nerve injury with incomplete resolution but that did not warrant surgical treatment (n = 1, 3%). A reoperation was required in 3 patients (9%).

Conclusion

The STOMP approach is a safe approach for elbow arthroplasty surgery. It does not detach the triceps and we believe it offers improved exposure and safety compared to other triceps-on techniques. Furthermore, this approach allows excellent surgical access to the coronoid, olecranon, and ulnar canal with low midterm complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述一种新的肘关节置换术入路:选择性三头肌-内侧鹰嘴旁(STOMP)入路。
背景:全肘关节置换术(TEA)的手术入路大致分为两组;“关闭三头肌”和“打开三头肌”的方法。传统的“肱三头肌关闭”方法为TEA提供了很好的可视化;然而,它们有肱三头肌衰竭的风险,需要肱三头肌保护康复方案。三头肌入路在保留三头肌功能方面具有优势,但在接近和准备尺骨和桡骨近端骨表面方面存在技术挑战。我们在此介绍一种新的选择性肱三头肌-内侧鹰嘴旁(STOMP)入路治疗TEA的手术技术、适应症和初步结果,该入路既能保留肱三头肌功能,又能很好地暴露于尺侧近端,对尺神经的风险最小。方法:对2010年至2020年间资深作者采用STOMP入路进行原发性TEA、半关节置换术或翻修肘关节置换术的所有患者进行双中心、回顾性队列研究。整理患者资料,包括入院人口统计和诊断。结果测量从患者图表中收集。结果:在回顾期内,35例患者共行37例肘关节置换术,其中27例(77%)为女性。原发性关节置换术32例(86%),翻修术5例(14%)。导致肘关节置换术的主要适应症是类风湿关节炎(n = 18, 49%),其次是原发性或继发性肘关节骨关节炎(n = 9, 24%)和肱骨远端骨折(n = 7, 19%)。术后并发症7例(19%)。5例患者(14%)出现肘关节僵硬,1例患者术后鹰嘴骨折(n = 1.3%), 1例患者尺神经损伤不完全消退,但不需要手术治疗(n = 1.3%)。3例(9%)患者需要再次手术。结论:STOMP入路是一种安全的肘关节置换术入路。它不会使肱三头肌分离,我们相信与其他肱三头肌固定技术相比,它提供了更好的暴露和安全性。此外,该入路具有良好的冠状、鹰嘴和尺管手术通路,中期并发症低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome score is a strong predictor of shoulder pain and function in glenohumeral osteoarthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy Timing of corticosteroid injection within 1 year prior to rotator cuff repair was not associated with increased risk of repair failure A multiplanar humeral head osteotomy results in significantly improved bone compression strength compared to a standard humeral head osteotomy in stemless total shoulder arthroplasty Translation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version Functional outcomes and complications of distal humerus hemiarthroplasty performed in acute versus salvage cases: a systematic meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1