Does a Real-Life Cognitively Enriched Walking Program "Take a Walk With Your Brain" Benefit Cognitive Functioning and Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf043
Pauline Hotterbeex, Greet Cardon, Melanie Beeckman, Julie Latomme, Wim Fias, Stef van Puyenbroeck, Sebastien Chastin, Jannique van Uffelen
{"title":"Does a Real-Life Cognitively Enriched Walking Program \"Take a Walk With Your Brain\" Benefit Cognitive Functioning and Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Pauline Hotterbeex, Greet Cardon, Melanie Beeckman, Julie Latomme, Wim Fias, Stef van Puyenbroeck, Sebastien Chastin, Jannique van Uffelen","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most studies examining combined cognitive and physical activity are conducted in laboratory settings. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) examines the effects of a real-life cognitively enriched walking program on cognitive functioning and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in adults aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A three-arm RCT was conducted, comparing the cognitively enriched walking program (WALK+, doing cognitive tasks while walking) with a walking program without enrichment (WALK-only) and a passive control condition (CONT). Both WALK+ and WALK-only had a duration of 6 months, with 2 outdoors, supervised group-based sessions per week (60-90 min/session). Cognitive functioning (short- and long-term memory, executive functioning, and processing speed) and MVPA were measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 148 community-dwelling adults (median age: 69 years, range: 65-85; 72% [n = 107] female) were included. Comparing WALK+ to WALK-only and CONT, and WALK-only to CONT, there were no significant intervention effects on cognitive functioning at 3, 6, or 12 months. MVPA decreased with 13 min/day in WALK+ between baseline and 12 months, while it increased between baseline and 6 months with 12 min/day in WALK-only and between 3 and 6 months with 16 min/day in CONT.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The WALK+ program did not lead to statistically significant benefits for cognitive functioning or MVPA compared to WALK-only or CONT. Future studies should explore for whom combined interventions may work and determine the optimal dosage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Most studies examining combined cognitive and physical activity are conducted in laboratory settings. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) examines the effects of a real-life cognitively enriched walking program on cognitive functioning and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in adults aged ≥65 years.

Research design and methods: A three-arm RCT was conducted, comparing the cognitively enriched walking program (WALK+, doing cognitive tasks while walking) with a walking program without enrichment (WALK-only) and a passive control condition (CONT). Both WALK+ and WALK-only had a duration of 6 months, with 2 outdoors, supervised group-based sessions per week (60-90 min/session). Cognitive functioning (short- and long-term memory, executive functioning, and processing speed) and MVPA were measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, respectively.

Results: A total of 148 community-dwelling adults (median age: 69 years, range: 65-85; 72% [n = 107] female) were included. Comparing WALK+ to WALK-only and CONT, and WALK-only to CONT, there were no significant intervention effects on cognitive functioning at 3, 6, or 12 months. MVPA decreased with 13 min/day in WALK+ between baseline and 12 months, while it increased between baseline and 6 months with 12 min/day in WALK-only and between 3 and 6 months with 16 min/day in CONT.

Discussion and implications: The WALK+ program did not lead to statistically significant benefits for cognitive functioning or MVPA compared to WALK-only or CONT. Future studies should explore for whom combined interventions may work and determine the optimal dosage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个现实生活中增强认知能力的步行项目“与你的大脑散步”对社区居住的老年人的认知功能和身体活动有益吗?一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:大多数检查认知和身体活动结合的研究都是在实验室环境中进行的。这项随机对照试验(RCT)研究了现实生活中认知丰富的步行计划对65岁以上成年人认知功能和中高强度身体活动(MVPA)的影响。研究设计和方法:采用三臂随机对照试验,比较认知强化步行计划(WALK+,边走边做认知任务)与不强化步行计划(WALK-only)和被动对照条件(CONT)。WALK+和WALK-only的持续时间都是六个月,每周有两次户外,有监督的小组会议(60-90分钟/次)。认知功能(短期和长期记忆、执行功能和处理速度)和MVPA分别在基线、3个月、6个月和12个月使用剑桥神经心理测试自动电池(CANTAB)和ActiGraph GT3X+加速度计进行测量。结果:共148名社区居住成年人(年龄中位数:69岁,范围:65-85岁;72% (n=107)为女性。比较WALK+与WALK-only和CONT,以及WALK-only与CONT,在3个月、6个月和12个月时,干预对认知功能没有显著影响。在基线和12个月之间,WALK+组的MVPA以13分钟/天的速度下降,而在基线和6个月之间,WALK+组的MVPA以12分钟/天的速度增加,而在3到6个月之间,WALK+组的MVPA以16分钟/天的速度增加。讨论和意义:与WALK+组或CONT组相比,WALK+组的认知功能或MVPA没有统计学上显著的益处。未来的研究应探讨联合干预措施可能对哪些人有效并确定最佳剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Polyvictimization, Social Relationship Quality, and Depressive Symptoms in Later Life. Special Issue: Hispanic/Latinx Healthy Aging. Supporting Hispanic Caregiver Subjective Health & Well-being: A Test of User-reactions and Preliminary Efficacy of a Psychoeducational Program for Hispanic Dementia Caregivers. Bridging the Expectation-Performance Gap: How Framing Shapes Older Adults' Intentions to Engage with AI Health Technologies. Scoping Review of AI-Chatbots to Support Family Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1