Evaluation of throwing ability after coracoid transfer in non-overhead athletes

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.017
Ryota Yokoi DP , Takayuki Kawasaki MD, PhD , Yuuki Hirai DP , Hiroki Tanabe MD , Tomohiko Tateishi MD, PhD , Nobukazu Maki DP , Daichi Morikawa MD, PhD , Muneaki Ishijima MD, PhD
{"title":"Evaluation of throwing ability after coracoid transfer in non-overhead athletes","authors":"Ryota Yokoi DP ,&nbsp;Takayuki Kawasaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuuki Hirai DP ,&nbsp;Hiroki Tanabe MD ,&nbsp;Tomohiko Tateishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nobukazu Maki DP ,&nbsp;Daichi Morikawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Muneaki Ishijima MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coracoid transfer is the most common procedure for the treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations with large glenoid bone defects; however, it is rarely used for the treatment of throwing shoulders because of possible postoperative limited range of motion. This study aimed to evaluate throwing function after coracoid transfer for shoulder instability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included non-overhead athletes (n = 11; Bristow-Latarjet [BL] group) who suffered shoulder dislocation and underwent coracoid transfer on the dominant side of the shoulder and healthy volunteers (n = 20; C group) from the same population (overall age distribution: 18–22 years). All participants were evaluated for shoulder function including ball-throwing abilities (e.g., ball velocity and long-throw distance). In the primary analyses, we compared the maximum ball velocity and long-throw distance between the groups using the repeated 2-way analysis of variance. In secondary analyses, all other measurements were compared between the groups using the Mann–Whitney U test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the primary analysis, mean maximum ball velocity and long-throw distance in the BL and C groups were 83.5 and 87.9 km/h versus 44.8 and 54.7 m, respectively, demonstrating no significant differences between the groups. In the secondary analysis, only the range of external rotation with the shoulder at the side was significantly lower in the BL group (<em>P</em> = .046).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The throwing ability after coracoid transfer in non-overhead athletes is acceptable compared to that in the matched population. Therefore, this procedure may be an option for treating traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations with large bone defects in athletes such as goalkeepers, handball, and basketball players at the recreational level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coracoid transfer is the most common procedure for the treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations with large glenoid bone defects; however, it is rarely used for the treatment of throwing shoulders because of possible postoperative limited range of motion. This study aimed to evaluate throwing function after coracoid transfer for shoulder instability.

Methods

The study included non-overhead athletes (n = 11; Bristow-Latarjet [BL] group) who suffered shoulder dislocation and underwent coracoid transfer on the dominant side of the shoulder and healthy volunteers (n = 20; C group) from the same population (overall age distribution: 18–22 years). All participants were evaluated for shoulder function including ball-throwing abilities (e.g., ball velocity and long-throw distance). In the primary analyses, we compared the maximum ball velocity and long-throw distance between the groups using the repeated 2-way analysis of variance. In secondary analyses, all other measurements were compared between the groups using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

In the primary analysis, mean maximum ball velocity and long-throw distance in the BL and C groups were 83.5 and 87.9 km/h versus 44.8 and 54.7 m, respectively, demonstrating no significant differences between the groups. In the secondary analysis, only the range of external rotation with the shoulder at the side was significantly lower in the BL group (P = .046).

Conclusion

The throwing ability after coracoid transfer in non-overhead athletes is acceptable compared to that in the matched population. Therefore, this procedure may be an option for treating traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations with large bone defects in athletes such as goalkeepers, handball, and basketball players at the recreational level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Denervation procedure of the lateral epicondyle for refractory lateral epicondylitis Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures Role of three-dimensional computed tomography with humeral subtraction in assessing anteromedial facet coronoid fractures Medial elbow approaches for coronoid fractures: risk to the ulnar nerve Minimally invasive needle tenotomy vs. platelet rich plasma injection in the treatment of chronic elbow epicondylitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1