Lower trapezius tendon transfer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears improves outcomes in patients with high grade fatty infiltration of teres minor

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.014
Eva Gusnowski MD, FRCSC , Eric Wagner MD , Sheila McRae PhD , Hayden Cooke MD , Anthony Karzon MD , Michael Gottschalk MD , Peter MacDonald MD, FRCSC , Jarret Woodmass MD, FRCSC
{"title":"Lower trapezius tendon transfer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears improves outcomes in patients with high grade fatty infiltration of teres minor","authors":"Eva Gusnowski MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Eric Wagner MD ,&nbsp;Sheila McRae PhD ,&nbsp;Hayden Cooke MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Karzon MD ,&nbsp;Michael Gottschalk MD ,&nbsp;Peter MacDonald MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Jarret Woodmass MD, FRCSC","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study compares postoperative outcomes of lower trapezius tendon transfers (LTTTs) in massive irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears based on the degree of teres minor (TM) fatty infiltration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective longitudinal observational study, patients with massive RC tears undergoing arthroscopic-assisted LTTT by two surgeons were screened. TM fatty infiltration on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was graded using the Goutallier classification. Two groups were created as follows: group A included grades 0 and 1 (no or little fatty infiltration), and group B included grades 2 to 4 (moderate-to-severe fatty infiltration). Participants completed the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score preoperatively, and 12- and/or 24 months postoperatively along with a clinical assessment. Independent t-tests compared groups, and paired t-tests compared pre-vs. postoperative results. Significance was defined as <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 47 patients in group A and 19 in group B. No group differences were found in preoperative SANE score, forward elevation or active external rotation (ER). Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in SANE score with no differences between the groups. An ER lag sign was observed in 18/47 patients (38.3%) in group A and 11/19 patients (57.9%) in group B (<em>P</em> = .177). Preoperative ER strength was significantly different in group A (2.9 kg) vs. group B (0.7 kg; <em>P</em> = .001), but postoperative ER strength was similar (<em>P</em> = .931).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LTTT is a suitable salvage procedure regardless of the degree of TM fatty infiltration and should be considered an alterative procedure to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with high-grade TM fatty infiltration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 296-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study compares postoperative outcomes of lower trapezius tendon transfers (LTTTs) in massive irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears based on the degree of teres minor (TM) fatty infiltration.

Methods

In this prospective longitudinal observational study, patients with massive RC tears undergoing arthroscopic-assisted LTTT by two surgeons were screened. TM fatty infiltration on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was graded using the Goutallier classification. Two groups were created as follows: group A included grades 0 and 1 (no or little fatty infiltration), and group B included grades 2 to 4 (moderate-to-severe fatty infiltration). Participants completed the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score preoperatively, and 12- and/or 24 months postoperatively along with a clinical assessment. Independent t-tests compared groups, and paired t-tests compared pre-vs. postoperative results. Significance was defined as P < .05.

Results

There were 47 patients in group A and 19 in group B. No group differences were found in preoperative SANE score, forward elevation or active external rotation (ER). Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in SANE score with no differences between the groups. An ER lag sign was observed in 18/47 patients (38.3%) in group A and 11/19 patients (57.9%) in group B (P = .177). Preoperative ER strength was significantly different in group A (2.9 kg) vs. group B (0.7 kg; P = .001), but postoperative ER strength was similar (P = .931).

Conclusion

LTTT is a suitable salvage procedure regardless of the degree of TM fatty infiltration and should be considered an alterative procedure to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with high-grade TM fatty infiltration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Denervation procedure of the lateral epicondyle for refractory lateral epicondylitis Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures Role of three-dimensional computed tomography with humeral subtraction in assessing anteromedial facet coronoid fractures Medial elbow approaches for coronoid fractures: risk to the ulnar nerve Minimally invasive needle tenotomy vs. platelet rich plasma injection in the treatment of chronic elbow epicondylitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1