Assessing the expenditure decentralization in enhancing public service quality: Evidence from 29 province in China

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102551
Wenjun Mai , Lijun Mai , Yanpeng Chen
{"title":"Assessing the expenditure decentralization in enhancing public service quality: Evidence from 29 province in China","authors":"Wenjun Mai ,&nbsp;Lijun Mai ,&nbsp;Yanpeng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Insufficient and low public service quality in China has resulted in unfulfilled resident needs, necessitating an examination to improve public service quality. Thus, this study constructs a public service quality index for 29 provinces covering 2004–2020 to explore the relationship between expenditure decentralization and public service quality. Using Fixed effects model, OLS and System Generalized Method of Moments (SYS-GMM) technique, this study reveals that expenditure decentralization has a significantly positive effect on public service quality, with a 1 % increase in expenditure decentralization leading to a 0.287 % improvement in public service quality. Additionally, the impact of expenditure decentralization on public service quality in the eastern and central regions is positively significant, while in the western region, expenditure decentralization does not positively affect public service quality. Furthermore, based on the public service quality theory, this study finds that FDI and fiscal self-sufficiency can enhance the relationship between expenditure decentralization and public service quality. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for policymakers to prioritize expenditure decentralization as a strategy to enhance public service quality, especially when considering attracting FDI and promoting fiscal self-sufficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insufficient and low public service quality in China has resulted in unfulfilled resident needs, necessitating an examination to improve public service quality. Thus, this study constructs a public service quality index for 29 provinces covering 2004–2020 to explore the relationship between expenditure decentralization and public service quality. Using Fixed effects model, OLS and System Generalized Method of Moments (SYS-GMM) technique, this study reveals that expenditure decentralization has a significantly positive effect on public service quality, with a 1 % increase in expenditure decentralization leading to a 0.287 % improvement in public service quality. Additionally, the impact of expenditure decentralization on public service quality in the eastern and central regions is positively significant, while in the western region, expenditure decentralization does not positively affect public service quality. Furthermore, based on the public service quality theory, this study finds that FDI and fiscal self-sufficiency can enhance the relationship between expenditure decentralization and public service quality. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for policymakers to prioritize expenditure decentralization as a strategy to enhance public service quality, especially when considering attracting FDI and promoting fiscal self-sufficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支出分权对提高公共服务质量的影响:来自中国29个省份的证据。
中国公共服务质量的不足和低下导致居民需求无法得到满足,需要对公共服务质量的提高进行研究。为此,本研究构建了2004-2020年29个省份的公共服务质量指标,探讨支出分权与公共服务质量的关系。运用固定效应模型、OLS和系统广义矩量法(SYS-GMM)技术,研究发现支出分散化对公共服务质量有显著的正向影响,支出分散化每增加1 %,公共服务质量就会提高0.287 %。此外,支出分权对公共服务质量的影响在东部和中部地区呈显著正相关,而在西部地区,支出分权对公共服务质量没有显著正向影响。进一步,基于公共服务质量理论,本研究发现FDI和财政自给能够增强支出分权与公共服务质量的关系。该研究为政策制定者提供了基于证据的建议,建议他们优先考虑将支出下放作为提高公共服务质量的战略,特别是在考虑吸引外国直接投资和促进财政自给自足时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Implementation fidelity of a sport-based positive youth development program designed to teach sport and social skills Lessons learned from a collective evaluation and community of practice focused on evidence-based learning Evaluation policies in international non-governmental humanitarian organisations From needs to dreams: An aspiration-based community needs assessment methodology From strategy to evaluation: A social determinants of healthy campus framework for evaluating U.S. campus health programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1