Intercultural sensitivity among nursing educators: Comparison between Japan and China

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106592
Congcong Wang , Akiko Kondo , Kazuko Naruse , Kosuke Niitsu , Dingyi Long
{"title":"Intercultural sensitivity among nursing educators: Comparison between Japan and China","authors":"Congcong Wang ,&nbsp;Akiko Kondo ,&nbsp;Kazuko Naruse ,&nbsp;Kosuke Niitsu ,&nbsp;Dingyi Long","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to globalization, intercultural sensitivity is critical for nursing educators to train students for diverse cultural settings. However, research on factors influencing intercultural sensitivity among nursing educators is limited worldwide, including in Japan and China.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To compare the factors related to intercultural sensitivity among nursing educators in Japan and China.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional international comparative study.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>Nursing educators from 284 nursing universities in Japan and 303 nursing universities in mainland China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nursing educators with national nursing qualifications, affiliated with nursing-related departments, who taught and mentored students were included. Those who could not speak Japanese or Chinese were excluded. Participants completed an online survey that included factors related to intercultural sensitivity and the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. A linear regression analysis was used to examine these associations. The data were collected between October and December 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1240 nursing educators participated. We analyzed valid data of 1236 responses (<em>n</em> = 1022 from Japan, <em>n</em> = 214 from China). Chinese participants had higher intercultural sensitivity than Japanese participants after adjusting for confounding factors. Experience in studying, researching, and training abroad were positively associated with intercultural sensitivity in both groups. For Japanese participants, cross-cultural friendships, participation in cross-cultural exchanges, and non-native language ability were positive factors. For Chinese participants, frequent use of non-native languages and having family members with foreign experience were positively correlated with intercultural sensitivity; years of full-time work were negatively correlated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study revealed the intercultural sensitivity of Chinese nursing educators was higher than that of Japanese educators. Facilitating opportunities for international studies are recommended for both Japanese and Chinese groups. Enhancing intercultural sensitivity among Japanese participants should involve promoting cross-cultural interactions, fostering cross-cultural friendships, and improving non-native language abilities. Emphasizing non-native language use could improve the intercultural sensitivity of Chinese participants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106592"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to globalization, intercultural sensitivity is critical for nursing educators to train students for diverse cultural settings. However, research on factors influencing intercultural sensitivity among nursing educators is limited worldwide, including in Japan and China.

Aim

To compare the factors related to intercultural sensitivity among nursing educators in Japan and China.

Design

A cross-sectional international comparative study.

Settings

Nursing educators from 284 nursing universities in Japan and 303 nursing universities in mainland China.

Methods

Nursing educators with national nursing qualifications, affiliated with nursing-related departments, who taught and mentored students were included. Those who could not speak Japanese or Chinese were excluded. Participants completed an online survey that included factors related to intercultural sensitivity and the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. A linear regression analysis was used to examine these associations. The data were collected between October and December 2023.

Results

A total of 1240 nursing educators participated. We analyzed valid data of 1236 responses (n = 1022 from Japan, n = 214 from China). Chinese participants had higher intercultural sensitivity than Japanese participants after adjusting for confounding factors. Experience in studying, researching, and training abroad were positively associated with intercultural sensitivity in both groups. For Japanese participants, cross-cultural friendships, participation in cross-cultural exchanges, and non-native language ability were positive factors. For Chinese participants, frequent use of non-native languages and having family members with foreign experience were positively correlated with intercultural sensitivity; years of full-time work were negatively correlated.

Conclusion

The study revealed the intercultural sensitivity of Chinese nursing educators was higher than that of Japanese educators. Facilitating opportunities for international studies are recommended for both Japanese and Chinese groups. Enhancing intercultural sensitivity among Japanese participants should involve promoting cross-cultural interactions, fostering cross-cultural friendships, and improving non-native language abilities. Emphasizing non-native language use could improve the intercultural sensitivity of Chinese participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Nursing curricula in Indonesia and Scandinavia: What can we learn from each other to strengthen nursing education Nursing in tune: Evaluation of the effectiveness of podcasts as an educational tool for undergraduate students - A cross-sectional study Editorial Board Registered nurses' experiences of the graduate nurse residency program: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1