Effects of cardiac and respiratory phases on auditory evoked potentials

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES International Journal of Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112521
Keita Mizuhara , Lingjun Li , Hiroshi Nittono
{"title":"Effects of cardiac and respiratory phases on auditory evoked potentials","authors":"Keita Mizuhara ,&nbsp;Lingjun Li ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Nittono","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brain-body interactions play a crucial role in the perceptual and cognitive processing of external stimuli. Previous research has examined how cardiac phases (systole, diastole) and respiratory phases (inhalation, exhalation) influence various psychological functions, though findings on their impact on auditory processing remain inconsistent. This study investigated whether cardiac and respiratory phases affect auditory ERP components, specifically N1 and P2. To control for cardiac-related artifacts, pure tones (70 dB) and silent stimuli (0 dB) were presented in alternating, randomized intervals, and ERP difference waveforms were computed by subtracting waveforms elicited by silent stimuli from those elicited by tones. Two experiments were conducted with different participants: watching a video while ignoring the tones (Experiment 1) or pressing a button as quickly as possible in response to the tones while watching the video (Experiment 2). Results showed no significant differences in N1 amplitude between cardiac or respiratory phases. P2 amplitude was significantly larger at diastole than systole, although the effect size was small (<em>d</em><sub>z</sub> = 0.26). For respiratory phases, P2 amplitude was greater during exhalation than inhalation when participants ignored the tones (<em>d</em><sub>z</sub> = 0.35), but this effect disappeared when they attended to the tones. These findings suggest that visceral afferent signals may influence auditory processing by modulating attentional resource allocation across different cardiac and respiratory phases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 112521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025000170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain-body interactions play a crucial role in the perceptual and cognitive processing of external stimuli. Previous research has examined how cardiac phases (systole, diastole) and respiratory phases (inhalation, exhalation) influence various psychological functions, though findings on their impact on auditory processing remain inconsistent. This study investigated whether cardiac and respiratory phases affect auditory ERP components, specifically N1 and P2. To control for cardiac-related artifacts, pure tones (70 dB) and silent stimuli (0 dB) were presented in alternating, randomized intervals, and ERP difference waveforms were computed by subtracting waveforms elicited by silent stimuli from those elicited by tones. Two experiments were conducted with different participants: watching a video while ignoring the tones (Experiment 1) or pressing a button as quickly as possible in response to the tones while watching the video (Experiment 2). Results showed no significant differences in N1 amplitude between cardiac or respiratory phases. P2 amplitude was significantly larger at diastole than systole, although the effect size was small (dz = 0.26). For respiratory phases, P2 amplitude was greater during exhalation than inhalation when participants ignored the tones (dz = 0.35), but this effect disappeared when they attended to the tones. These findings suggest that visceral afferent signals may influence auditory processing by modulating attentional resource allocation across different cardiac and respiratory phases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
期刊最新文献
Influence of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on marksmanship, cognition, and the healthy stress response No aftereffect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on theta activity during an inter-sensory selective attention task Editorial Board International Organization of Psychophysiology ‘Wired up about self’ - narcissistic traits predict elevated physiological arousal during self-disclosure in conversation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1