A mixed methods study of backup behavior among interprofessional ICU teams

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart & Lung Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.012
Deena Kelly Costa PhD, RN, FAAN , Kathryn A. Lee PhD, RN , Nathan C. Wright MA , Emily M. Boltey PhD, RN , Hannah C. Ratliff PhD, RN , Deanna J. Marriott PhD , Olga Yakusheva PhD
{"title":"A mixed methods study of backup behavior among interprofessional ICU teams","authors":"Deena Kelly Costa PhD, RN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Lee PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Nathan C. Wright MA ,&nbsp;Emily M. Boltey PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Hannah C. Ratliff PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Deanna J. Marriott PhD ,&nbsp;Olga Yakusheva PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Backup behavior—when clinicians help each other via verbal assistance or task completion in their roles–is essential for effective teamwork in the intensive care unit (ICU) but is not well understood. Exploring how interprofessional team members provide backup may guide future interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine who, how often, why, and under what circumstances ICU clinicians provide backup in mechanical ventilation care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a convergence, triangulation mixed methods design in 2 medical ICUs (2017–2019), we collected qualitative data (observation, shadowing, interviews) to understand how ICU teams provide backup; and patient-shift level surveys of ICU nurses, physicians, and respiratory therapists, to identify whom clinicians contacted for help that shift. We analyzed and compared these data to gain insight into the frequency, and circumstances surrounding ICU clinicians’ requests for and receipt of backup when providing mechanical ventilation care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Backup behavior was common. Interprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to respiratory therapist) related to specific patient care tasks. Intraprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to nurse) involved team members ‘checking in’ to assist their colleague. Most (57%) survey respondents reported at least one interprofessional contact on day and night shifts, and approximately 25% reported at least one intraprofessional backup contact. We identified distinct backup behavior patterns on day and night shifts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While backup behavior was common, interprofessional backup focused on care aligning with professional roles whereas intraprofessional backup entailed checking-in with team members. Examining how to enhance interprofessional backup through trainings or interventions may improve how teams work and patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956325000147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Backup behavior—when clinicians help each other via verbal assistance or task completion in their roles–is essential for effective teamwork in the intensive care unit (ICU) but is not well understood. Exploring how interprofessional team members provide backup may guide future interventions.

Objective

To examine who, how often, why, and under what circumstances ICU clinicians provide backup in mechanical ventilation care.

Methods

Using a convergence, triangulation mixed methods design in 2 medical ICUs (2017–2019), we collected qualitative data (observation, shadowing, interviews) to understand how ICU teams provide backup; and patient-shift level surveys of ICU nurses, physicians, and respiratory therapists, to identify whom clinicians contacted for help that shift. We analyzed and compared these data to gain insight into the frequency, and circumstances surrounding ICU clinicians’ requests for and receipt of backup when providing mechanical ventilation care.

Results

Backup behavior was common. Interprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to respiratory therapist) related to specific patient care tasks. Intraprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to nurse) involved team members ‘checking in’ to assist their colleague. Most (57%) survey respondents reported at least one interprofessional contact on day and night shifts, and approximately 25% reported at least one intraprofessional backup contact. We identified distinct backup behavior patterns on day and night shifts.

Conclusions

While backup behavior was common, interprofessional backup focused on care aligning with professional roles whereas intraprofessional backup entailed checking-in with team members. Examining how to enhance interprofessional backup through trainings or interventions may improve how teams work and patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨专业ICU团队后备行为的混合方法研究。
背景:后备行为-当临床医生通过口头协助或任务完成相互帮助在他们的角色-是必要的有效的团队合作在重症监护室(ICU),但不是很好理解。探索跨专业团队成员如何提供支持可能会指导未来的干预。目的:探讨ICU临床医生在机械通气护理中提供支持的人员、频率、原因和情况。方法:采用收敛、三角混合方法设计2个ICU(2017-2019),收集定性数据(观察、阴影、访谈),了解ICU团队如何提供备份;以及ICU护士、内科医生和呼吸治疗师的病人轮班水平调查,以确定临床医生在轮班时联系了谁寻求帮助。我们对这些数据进行了分析和比较,以深入了解ICU临床医生在提供机械通气护理时请求和接收备份的频率和情况。结果:备份行为普遍存在。与特定病人护理任务相关的跨专业支援(例如护士对呼吸治疗师)。专业内部支援(例如护士对护士)涉及团队成员“报到”以协助他们的同事。大多数(57%)受访者表示,在白班和夜班期间至少有一次跨专业接触,约25%的受访者表示至少有一次专业内的后备接触。我们在白班和夜班中发现了不同的后备行为模式。结论:虽然备份行为很常见,但跨专业备份侧重于与专业角色保持一致,而专业内备份则需要与团队成员进行检查。研究如何通过培训或干预来加强专业间的支援,可能会改善团队工作和患者护理的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure discharge checklist to improve guideline-directed medical therapy adherence and 30-day readmission rates Factor XI inhibitors versus direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic events and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials TyG-adiposity composites predict long-term MACCE after CABG: Evidence for partial mediation by CRP Effect of the cardiac troponin-T trajectory on the mortality and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study from the MIMIC IV database The relationship between eGFR difference and in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients stratified by chronic kidney disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1