Exploring potential drug-drug interactions in discharge prescriptions: ChatGPT's effectiveness in assessing those interactions

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100564
Rahi Bikram Thapa , Subash Karki , Sabin Shrestha
{"title":"Exploring potential drug-drug interactions in discharge prescriptions: ChatGPT's effectiveness in assessing those interactions","authors":"Rahi Bikram Thapa ,&nbsp;Subash Karki ,&nbsp;Sabin Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) pose substantial risks in clinical practice, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Tools like Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker are commonly used to screen for pDDIs, yet emerging AI models, such as ChatGPT, offer the potential for supplementary pDDI prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these AI tools in a clinical context remain largely untested.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates pDDIs in discharge prescriptions for medical ward patients and assesses ChatGPT-4.0's effectiveness in predicting these interactions compared to Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted over three months with 301 discharged patients. pDDIs were identified using Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker, detailing each interaction's occurrence, severity, onset, and documentation. ChatGPT-4.0 predictions were then analyzed against Micromedex data. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influence of predictor variables in the occurrence of pDDIs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1551 drugs were prescribed to 301 patients, averaging 5.15 per patient. pDDIs were detected in 60.13 % of patients, averaging 3.17 pDDIs per patient, ChatGPT-4.0 accurately identified pDDIs (100 % for occurrence) but had limited accuracy for severity (37.3 %) and moderate accuracy for onset (65.2 %). The most frequent major interaction was between Cefuroxime Axetil and Pantoprazole Sodium. Polypharmacy significantly increased the risk of pDDIs (OR: 3.960, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>pDDIs are prevalent in internal medicine discharge prescriptions, with polypharmacy heightening the risk. While ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identifies pDDI occurrence, its limitations in predicting severity, onset, and documentation underscore healthcare professionals' need for careful oversight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) pose substantial risks in clinical practice, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Tools like Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker are commonly used to screen for pDDIs, yet emerging AI models, such as ChatGPT, offer the potential for supplementary pDDI prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these AI tools in a clinical context remain largely untested.

Objective

This study evaluates pDDIs in discharge prescriptions for medical ward patients and assesses ChatGPT-4.0's effectiveness in predicting these interactions compared to Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted over three months with 301 discharged patients. pDDIs were identified using Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker, detailing each interaction's occurrence, severity, onset, and documentation. ChatGPT-4.0 predictions were then analyzed against Micromedex data. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influence of predictor variables in the occurrence of pDDIs.

Results

1551 drugs were prescribed to 301 patients, averaging 5.15 per patient. pDDIs were detected in 60.13 % of patients, averaging 3.17 pDDIs per patient, ChatGPT-4.0 accurately identified pDDIs (100 % for occurrence) but had limited accuracy for severity (37.3 %) and moderate accuracy for onset (65.2 %). The most frequent major interaction was between Cefuroxime Axetil and Pantoprazole Sodium. Polypharmacy significantly increased the risk of pDDIs (OR: 3.960, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

pDDIs are prevalent in internal medicine discharge prescriptions, with polypharmacy heightening the risk. While ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identifies pDDI occurrence, its limitations in predicting severity, onset, and documentation underscore healthcare professionals' need for careful oversight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring the need for a clinical decision support system for deprescribing - A qualitative interview study Lived experience of affordability as a barrier to prescription medicines: A longitudinal qualitative study e-Health applications for outpatient professional pharmaceutical care services: A scoping review Performance of antiretroviral drugs supply chain management and related challenges in Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. In the case of public health facilities found in the Central Gondar zone Community pharmacists' decision-making patterns in clinical prescription checking: A simulation-based study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1