Laura E.T. Swan , Ortal Wasser , Lindsay M. Cannon
{"title":"The importance of patient-centered contraceptive care: Linking provider contraceptive coercion to patient psychological distress and mental well-being","authors":"Laura E.T. Swan , Ortal Wasser , Lindsay M. Cannon","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Provider-based contraceptive coercion, or pressure from a healthcare provider to use or not to use birth control, undermines patient-centered care. We investigated the relationship between contraceptive coercion and mental health, which is previously unstudied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2023, we used Prolific to survey reproductive-aged people in the United States who were assigned female at birth. We conducted <em>t</em>-tests and linear regression to assess relationships between upward (pressure to use birth control) and downward contraceptive coercion (pressure to <em>not</em> use birth control) and psychological distress and mental well-being among participants who had ever received contraceptive counseling (<em>N</em> = 1,154).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In bivariate analyses, we found a significant association between contraceptive coercion and psychological distress (upward coercion: <em>M</em> = 8.31 vs. 9.82, <em>t</em> = -3.023, <em>p</em> = 0.003; downward coercion: <em>M</em> = 8.44 vs. 10.78, <em>t</em> = -2.634, <em>p</em> = 0.009) and between contraceptive coercion and emotional (upward coercion: <em>M</em> = 7.60 vs. 7.04, <em>t</em> = 2.613, <em>p</em> = 0.009; downward coercion: <em>M</em> = 7.56 vs. 6.52, <em>t</em> = 2.744, <em>p</em> = 0.006) and psychological well-being (upward coercion: <em>M</em> = 15.05 vs. 14.03, <em>t</em> = 2.339, <em>p</em> = 0.019; downward coercion: <em>M</em> = 15.00 vs. 12.66, <em>t</em> = 3.018, <em>p</em> = 0.003). When controlling for the effects of sociodemographic factors, both upward (<em>B</em> = 1.06, <em>SE</em> = 0.50, <em>p</em> = 0.034) and downward coercion (<em>B</em> = 1.94, <em>SE</em> = 0.88, <em>p</em> = 0.027) remained positively associated with psychological distress. Although downward coercion remained negatively associated with emotional (<em>B</em> = -0.78, <em>SE</em> = 0.37, <em>p</em> = 0.035) and psychological well-being (<em>B</em> = -1.89, <em>SE</em> = 0.75, <em>p</em> = 0.012), upward coercion did not.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>People who perceived coercion in their contraceptive care reported higher levels of psychological distress and worse mental well-being, underscoring the importance of safeguarding patients’ autonomy during contraceptive counseling to support reproductive decision-making and positive mental health outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575625000114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Provider-based contraceptive coercion, or pressure from a healthcare provider to use or not to use birth control, undermines patient-centered care. We investigated the relationship between contraceptive coercion and mental health, which is previously unstudied.
Methods
In 2023, we used Prolific to survey reproductive-aged people in the United States who were assigned female at birth. We conducted t-tests and linear regression to assess relationships between upward (pressure to use birth control) and downward contraceptive coercion (pressure to not use birth control) and psychological distress and mental well-being among participants who had ever received contraceptive counseling (N = 1,154).
Results
In bivariate analyses, we found a significant association between contraceptive coercion and psychological distress (upward coercion: M = 8.31 vs. 9.82, t = -3.023, p = 0.003; downward coercion: M = 8.44 vs. 10.78, t = -2.634, p = 0.009) and between contraceptive coercion and emotional (upward coercion: M = 7.60 vs. 7.04, t = 2.613, p = 0.009; downward coercion: M = 7.56 vs. 6.52, t = 2.744, p = 0.006) and psychological well-being (upward coercion: M = 15.05 vs. 14.03, t = 2.339, p = 0.019; downward coercion: M = 15.00 vs. 12.66, t = 3.018, p = 0.003). When controlling for the effects of sociodemographic factors, both upward (B = 1.06, SE = 0.50, p = 0.034) and downward coercion (B = 1.94, SE = 0.88, p = 0.027) remained positively associated with psychological distress. Although downward coercion remained negatively associated with emotional (B = -0.78, SE = 0.37, p = 0.035) and psychological well-being (B = -1.89, SE = 0.75, p = 0.012), upward coercion did not.
Conclusion
People who perceived coercion in their contraceptive care reported higher levels of psychological distress and worse mental well-being, underscoring the importance of safeguarding patients’ autonomy during contraceptive counseling to support reproductive decision-making and positive mental health outcomes.