SAGEA: A toolbox for comprehensive error assessment of GRACE and GRACE-FO based mass changes

IF 4.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Geosciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105825
Shuhao Liu , Fan Yang , Ehsan Forootan
{"title":"SAGEA: A toolbox for comprehensive error assessment of GRACE and GRACE-FO based mass changes","authors":"Shuhao Liu ,&nbsp;Fan Yang ,&nbsp;Ehsan Forootan","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The level-2 time-variable gravity fields obtained from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follow-on (GRACE-FO) mission are widely used in multi-discipline geoscience studies. However, the post-processing of these gravity fields to obtain a desired signal is rather challenging for users who are not familiar with the level-2 products. In addition, the error assessment/quantification of these derived signals, which is of increasing demand in science application, is still a challenging issue even among professional GRACE(-FO) users. In this paper, we review the known steps of post-processing, along with their implementation strategies. We also make a comprehensive investigation into the error of GRACE(-FO) based mass changes, and for the first time, we define the so-called error into three independent categories. This work, including the post-processing steps and the assessment of each error, is integrated into an open-source Python toolbox called SAGEA (SAtellite Gravity Error Assessment). With diverse options, SAGEA provides flexibility to generate signals along with the full error from level-2 products. In addition, a novel in-depth optimization of our post-processing implementation gains a speed-up of <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>100</mn></mrow></math></span> times better than traditional method. For verification, a number of case studies are carried out with SAGEA to obtain a comprehensive error assessment of GRACE(-FO) level-2 product at global and local scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55221,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Geosciences","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105825"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009830042400308X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The level-2 time-variable gravity fields obtained from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follow-on (GRACE-FO) mission are widely used in multi-discipline geoscience studies. However, the post-processing of these gravity fields to obtain a desired signal is rather challenging for users who are not familiar with the level-2 products. In addition, the error assessment/quantification of these derived signals, which is of increasing demand in science application, is still a challenging issue even among professional GRACE(-FO) users. In this paper, we review the known steps of post-processing, along with their implementation strategies. We also make a comprehensive investigation into the error of GRACE(-FO) based mass changes, and for the first time, we define the so-called error into three independent categories. This work, including the post-processing steps and the assessment of each error, is integrated into an open-source Python toolbox called SAGEA (SAtellite Gravity Error Assessment). With diverse options, SAGEA provides flexibility to generate signals along with the full error from level-2 products. In addition, a novel in-depth optimization of our post-processing implementation gains a speed-up of 100 times better than traditional method. For verification, a number of case studies are carried out with SAGEA to obtain a comprehensive error assessment of GRACE(-FO) level-2 product at global and local scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Geosciences
Computers & Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Geosciences publishes high impact, original research at the interface between Computer Sciences and Geosciences. Publications should apply modern computer science paradigms, whether computational or informatics-based, to address problems in the geosciences.
期刊最新文献
The GEMMA (Geo-EnvironMental multivariate analysis) toolbox: A user-friendly software for multivariate analysis Fault representation in structural modelling with implicit neural representations Geological-knowledge-guided graph self-supervised pretraining framework for identifying mineralization-related geochemical anomalies Editorial Board Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1