Ecoanatomía de la vía aérea difícil. Estudio de casos y controles

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.redar.2024.06.001
P. Kot , L. Rovira , M. Granell , P. Rodriguez , B. Cano , S. Pozo , J. De Andrés
{"title":"Ecoanatomía de la vía aérea difícil. Estudio de casos y controles","authors":"P. Kot ,&nbsp;L. Rovira ,&nbsp;M. Granell ,&nbsp;P. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;B. Cano ,&nbsp;S. Pozo ,&nbsp;J. De Andrés","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>The occurrence of a difficult airway during intubation is a critical event in anaesthesia. Despite the usefulness of clinical predictors, difficult intubation frequently arises unexpectedly. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of airway ultrasound in detecting these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This was a case-control study. The patients in the case group were identified from the registry of patients with reports of difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack III and IV). The controls were selected from among patients classed as Cormack I who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. Fifty patients (25 cases and 25 controls) participated in the study. All patients underwent ultrasound to obtain 3 measurements: distance from the skin to the hyoid bone, distance from the skin to the epiglottis, and distance from the skin to the vocal cords.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A skin-to-hyoid bone distance greater than 9.8 mm (50% of the sample) generated an odds ratio of 5.46 (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005); a skin-to-epiglottis distance greater than 21.3 mm (50% of the sample) generated an odds ratio of 6.62 (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002). There was no significant difference in the skin-to-vocal cords distance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ultrasound has proven to be a useful tool for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Despite the low sensitivity of clinical predictors, they appear to improve the detection of patients with difficult laryngoscopy when integrated into predictive models alongside ultrasound values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"72 1","pages":"Article 101642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935624001154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

The occurrence of a difficult airway during intubation is a critical event in anaesthesia. Despite the usefulness of clinical predictors, difficult intubation frequently arises unexpectedly. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of airway ultrasound in detecting these patients.

Materials and methods

This was a case-control study. The patients in the case group were identified from the registry of patients with reports of difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack III and IV). The controls were selected from among patients classed as Cormack I who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. Fifty patients (25 cases and 25 controls) participated in the study. All patients underwent ultrasound to obtain 3 measurements: distance from the skin to the hyoid bone, distance from the skin to the epiglottis, and distance from the skin to the vocal cords.

Results

A skin-to-hyoid bone distance greater than 9.8 mm (50% of the sample) generated an odds ratio of 5.46 (p = 0.005); a skin-to-epiglottis distance greater than 21.3 mm (50% of the sample) generated an odds ratio of 6.62 (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the skin-to-vocal cords distance.

Conclusions

Ultrasound has proven to be a useful tool for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Despite the low sensitivity of clinical predictors, they appear to improve the detection of patients with difficult laryngoscopy when integrated into predictive models alongside ultrasound values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬气道生态解剖。案例与对照研究
前言和目的插管过程中气道困难的发生是麻醉中的一个关键事件。尽管临床预测指标有用,但插管困难经常出乎意料地出现。本研究的目的是确定气道超声在检测这些患者中的效用。材料与方法本研究为病例对照研究。病例组的患者从报告喉镜检查困难的患者登记处(Cormack III和IV)中确定。对照组从在全身麻醉下接受手术的Cormack I级患者中选择。50例患者(25例和25例对照)参加了研究。所有患者均行超声检查,测量皮肤到舌骨的距离、皮肤到会厌的距离、皮肤到声带的距离。结果皮肤-舌骨距离大于9.8 mm(占样本的50%)的优势比为5.46 (p = 0.005);皮肤到会厌的距离大于21.3 mm(50%的样本)产生的优势比为6.62 (p = 0.002)。皮肤到声带的距离无显著差异。结论超声是预测喉镜检查困难的有效工具。尽管临床预测指标的敏感性较低,但当与超声值结合到预测模型中时,它们似乎可以提高对喉镜检查困难患者的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
82 days
期刊最新文献
Intubación submentoniana como alternativa a la traqueostomía en fractura panfacial compleja: reporte de un caso clínico Predicción clínica en el tratamiento con parche de capsaicina al 8% en dolor neuropático postraumático: una mirada crítica desde la evidencia acumulada Factores asociados a la mortalidad, estancia hospitalaria y limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en ancianos mayores de 80 años en una UCI quirúrgica: estudio observacional retrospectivo Evaluación comparativa del efecto de la aplicación de maniobras externas vs. ausencia de maniobras en la visión glótica durante la videolaringoscopia en pacientes sometidos a cirugía electiva con la cabeza en posición neutra Síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica tras circulación extracorpórea: prevalencia, predictores y resultados
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1