Assessing greenhouse gas emissions in hospitals: The development of an open-access calculator and its application to a German case-study

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100262
Claudia Quitmann , Leonard Terres , Andy Maun , Rainer Sauerborn , Emma Reynolds , Till Bärnighausen , Alina Herrmann , Bernd Franke
{"title":"Assessing greenhouse gas emissions in hospitals: The development of an open-access calculator and its application to a German case-study","authors":"Claudia Quitmann ,&nbsp;Leonard Terres ,&nbsp;Andy Maun ,&nbsp;Rainer Sauerborn ,&nbsp;Emma Reynolds ,&nbsp;Till Bärnighausen ,&nbsp;Alina Herrmann ,&nbsp;Bernd Franke","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hospitals are major contributors to climate change. It is therefore essential to identify the main sources of hospitals’ greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to develop and monitor mitigation measures. Yet, a transparent and comprehensive hospital-specific GHG accounting methodology is currently lacking. We have developed a hybrid methodology that follows the <em>GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard</em> to calculate emissions. We used bottom-up approaches to scope 1 and 2 and, where feasible, to scope 3. Due to data scarcity, we used top-down approaches for several scope-3-categories. As a case study demonstration, we applied this methodology to a German university hospital: Scope 3 accounted for the majority of GHG emissions (164,529 t CO<sub>2</sub>e (71%)), while scopes 1 (6008 t CO<sub>2</sub>e (3%)) and 2 (60,565 t CO<sub>2</sub>e (26%)) contributed less. Methodological challenges remain, such as a limited accuracy and monitoring options for top-down approaches. Nonetheless, this case study demonstrates that the developed methodology supports hospitals in measuring GHG emissions as part of their regulatory requirements and responsibility to safeguard planetary health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678942500008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitals are major contributors to climate change. It is therefore essential to identify the main sources of hospitals’ greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to develop and monitor mitigation measures. Yet, a transparent and comprehensive hospital-specific GHG accounting methodology is currently lacking. We have developed a hybrid methodology that follows the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard to calculate emissions. We used bottom-up approaches to scope 1 and 2 and, where feasible, to scope 3. Due to data scarcity, we used top-down approaches for several scope-3-categories. As a case study demonstration, we applied this methodology to a German university hospital: Scope 3 accounted for the majority of GHG emissions (164,529 t CO2e (71%)), while scopes 1 (6008 t CO2e (3%)) and 2 (60,565 t CO2e (26%)) contributed less. Methodological challenges remain, such as a limited accuracy and monitoring options for top-down approaches. Nonetheless, this case study demonstrates that the developed methodology supports hospitals in measuring GHG emissions as part of their regulatory requirements and responsibility to safeguard planetary health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医院的温室气体排放:开放获取计算器的开发及其在德国案例研究中的应用
医院是造成气候变化的主要因素。因此,确定医院温室气体(GHG)排放的主要来源,以制定和监测缓解措施至关重要。然而,目前缺乏透明和全面的针对医院的温室气体核算方法。我们开发了一种混合方法,该方法遵循温室气体议定书企业会计和报告标准来计算排放量。我们对范围1和2使用了自底向上的方法,如果可行的话,还对范围3使用了自底向上的方法。由于数据稀缺,我们对几个范围3的类别使用了自顶向下的方法。作为案例研究示范,我们将此方法应用于德国一所大学医院:范围3占温室气体排放量的大部分(164,529吨二氧化碳当量(71%)),而范围1(6008吨二氧化碳当量(3%))和范围2(60,565吨二氧化碳当量(26%))贡献较少。方法上的挑战仍然存在,例如自上而下方法的准确性和监测选项有限。尽管如此,本案例研究表明,所制定的方法支持医院测量温室气体排放,作为其监管要求和维护地球健康责任的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
How does environmental regulation reshape global value chain resilience? How to choose the functional unit for agricultural LCA? A stakeholder-centered conceptual framework Mapping the circular economy: Insights from 2,701 indicators Dynamic life cycle assessment of fibrous agricultural residues for long-lived carbon storage in building materials Sustainability indicators for accelerating the production of man-made cellulosic fibers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1