Classification of coronal plane alignment of arthritic and healthy knees in Japan

Gai Kobayashi, Masahiro Hasegawa, Yohei Yamabe, Shine Tone, Yohei Naito, Akihiro Sudo
{"title":"Classification of coronal plane alignment of arthritic and healthy knees in Japan","authors":"Gai Kobayashi,&nbsp;Masahiro Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yohei Yamabe,&nbsp;Shine Tone,&nbsp;Yohei Naito,&nbsp;Akihiro Sudo","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>There are geographic differences in the prevalence of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes. This study aimed to evaluate the CPAK classification of healthy and arthritic knees in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cohort of arthritic knees (150 knees in 125 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty) and a cohort of healthy knees (150 knees in 150 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hip arthroplasty with healthy knees) underwent radiological assessment with long-leg radiographs and were categorized into nine phenotypes. The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical and arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angles (mHKA and aHKA, respectively), and joint line obliquity were measured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean LDFA was 88.1° and 86.9° in the arthritic and healthy knee cohorts, respectively, and the mean MPTA was 85.2° and 86.6°, respectively. The mean mHKA was −8.0° and −1.2° and the mean aHKA was −2.9° and −0.3° in the arthritic and healthy knee cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in the distribution of varus/valgus knee on mHKA between the arthritic and healthy knee cohorts. In the arthritic knee cohort, most were CPAK type I (97 knees, 64.7%). Healthy knees were most commonly classified as type II (71 knees, 47.3%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The distribution of varus/valgus knee was similar in Japanese arthritic and healthy knees. However, the distribution of the CPAK classification in the arthritic and healthy knees of Japanese individuals was different.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294970512400032X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

There are geographic differences in the prevalence of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes. This study aimed to evaluate the CPAK classification of healthy and arthritic knees in Japan.

Methods

A cohort of arthritic knees (150 knees in 125 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty) and a cohort of healthy knees (150 knees in 150 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hip arthroplasty with healthy knees) underwent radiological assessment with long-leg radiographs and were categorized into nine phenotypes. The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical and arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angles (mHKA and aHKA, respectively), and joint line obliquity were measured.

Results

The mean LDFA was 88.1° and 86.9° in the arthritic and healthy knee cohorts, respectively, and the mean MPTA was 85.2° and 86.6°, respectively. The mean mHKA was −8.0° and −1.2° and the mean aHKA was −2.9° and −0.3° in the arthritic and healthy knee cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in the distribution of varus/valgus knee on mHKA between the arthritic and healthy knee cohorts. In the arthritic knee cohort, most were CPAK type I (97 knees, 64.7%). Healthy knees were most commonly classified as type II (71 knees, 47.3%).

Conclusions

The distribution of varus/valgus knee was similar in Japanese arthritic and healthy knees. However, the distribution of the CPAK classification in the arthritic and healthy knees of Japanese individuals was different.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention of surgical site infection: need to focus on the enemy within Appreciation to reviewers in 2024 Therapeutic strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures based on three classification systems Examination of intra-operative blood loss on the first side to perform simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty without allogeneic blood transfusion Comparison of cup placement accuracy using the navigation in total hip arthroplasty between three models using inverse probability of treatment weighting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1