Stacked-based hybrid gradient boosting models for estimating seepage from lined canals

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of water process engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106913
Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy
{"title":"Stacked-based hybrid gradient boosting models for estimating seepage from lined canals","authors":"Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate seepage loss estimation from lined canals is crucial for effective water management, especially in water-scarce regions. This study explores seepage loss prediction using advanced gradient boosting models optimized through Bayesian optimization (BO) and introduces a novel Stacked Multiple Linear Regression (SM-MLR) approach. Four hybrid base models were evaluated: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGB), CatBoost Gradient Boosting (CGB), and Natural Gradient Boosting (NGB), alongside SM-MLR. A dataset of 600 records, using key canal and liner characteristics as inputs, was analyzed. Model performance was assessed using R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE, with uncertainty evaluations and feature analysis through Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results showed that the SM-MLR model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.998 and RMSE of 0.161 during testing, significantly outperforming all base models and setting a new benchmark for seepage loss prediction in lined canals. Among the base models, BO-CGB demonstrated strong and consistent performance, but it slightly lagged behind the SM-MLR model in terms of overall accuracy. SHAP and PDP analysis identified liner hydraulic conductivity (<em>k</em><sub><em>L</em></sub>) as the most influential factor in seepage loss, followed by canal geometry and liner thickness. Further insights were gained from sensitivity analysis, which validated that optimizing <em>k</em><sub><em>L</em></sub> is the most effective strategy for minimizing seepage. Thus, the potential of hybrid ensemble modeling was highlighted in significantly improving predictive accuracy, providing a robust and reliable tool for water resource management. The SM-MLR model, by outperforming previous best predictive models, offers actionable insights for real-world canal design, emphasizing the need to consider both hydraulic and geometric parameters to optimize canal performance and support water conservation efforts in water-scarce regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 106913"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424021469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate seepage loss estimation from lined canals is crucial for effective water management, especially in water-scarce regions. This study explores seepage loss prediction using advanced gradient boosting models optimized through Bayesian optimization (BO) and introduces a novel Stacked Multiple Linear Regression (SM-MLR) approach. Four hybrid base models were evaluated: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGB), CatBoost Gradient Boosting (CGB), and Natural Gradient Boosting (NGB), alongside SM-MLR. A dataset of 600 records, using key canal and liner characteristics as inputs, was analyzed. Model performance was assessed using R2 and RMSE, with uncertainty evaluations and feature analysis through Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results showed that the SM-MLR model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with an R2 of 0.998 and RMSE of 0.161 during testing, significantly outperforming all base models and setting a new benchmark for seepage loss prediction in lined canals. Among the base models, BO-CGB demonstrated strong and consistent performance, but it slightly lagged behind the SM-MLR model in terms of overall accuracy. SHAP and PDP analysis identified liner hydraulic conductivity (kL) as the most influential factor in seepage loss, followed by canal geometry and liner thickness. Further insights were gained from sensitivity analysis, which validated that optimizing kL is the most effective strategy for minimizing seepage. Thus, the potential of hybrid ensemble modeling was highlighted in significantly improving predictive accuracy, providing a robust and reliable tool for water resource management. The SM-MLR model, by outperforming previous best predictive models, offers actionable insights for real-world canal design, emphasizing the need to consider both hydraulic and geometric parameters to optimize canal performance and support water conservation efforts in water-scarce regions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于叠加的混合梯度增强模型估算衬砌运河渗流
准确的渗水损失估算对于有效的水资源管理至关重要,特别是在缺水地区。本研究探讨了通过贝叶斯优化(BO)优化的先进梯度增强模型的渗流损失预测,并引入了一种新的堆叠多元线性回归(SM-MLR)方法。评估了四种混合基本模型:极端梯度增强(XGB),光梯度增强机(LGB), CatBoost梯度增强(CGB)和自然梯度增强(NGB),以及SM-MLR。对600条记录的数据集进行了分析,使用关键的运河和班轮特征作为输入。采用R2和RMSE评估模型性能,并通过偏相关图(pdp)和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)进行不确定性评估和特征分析。结果表明,SM-MLR模型预测精度最高,测试时的R2为0.998,RMSE为0.161,显著优于所有基础模型,为衬砌渠道渗流损失预测树立了新的标杆。在基本模型中,BO-CGB表现出较强的一致性,但在整体精度方面略落后于SM-MLR模型。SHAP和PDP分析发现,管道导流系数(kL)是影响渗漏损失最大的因素,其次是管道几何形状和管道厚度。从敏感性分析中获得了进一步的见解,验证了优化kL是最小化渗漏的最有效策略。因此,混合集成建模在显著提高预测精度方面的潜力得到了强调,为水资源管理提供了一个强大而可靠的工具。SM-MLR模型优于以往的最佳预测模型,为现实世界的运河设计提供了可操作的见解,强调需要考虑水力和几何参数来优化运河性能,并支持缺水地区的节水工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water process engineering
Journal of water process engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
846
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies
期刊最新文献
Zwitterionic and anionic ultrafiltration membrane modification for efficient, fouling-resistant microalgae harvesting Fabrication of a super hydrophilic 3D-printed membrane modified with nanoparticles for highly efficient oil/water separation Study on the effect of biochar on the phosphorus solubilization performance of phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria Research on an intelligent precise aeration control system for wastewater treatment based on LSTM models Biphasic toxicity of copper hydroxide nanopesticides to Microcystis aeruginosa: Mechanistic insights from physiological and transcriptomic responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1