PISA 2022 insights on intellectual curiosity, perspective-taking, and science achievement: Examining the mediating pathways

Othman Abu Khurma, Adeeb Jarrah, Nagla Ali
{"title":"PISA 2022 insights on intellectual curiosity, perspective-taking, and science achievement: Examining the mediating pathways","authors":"Othman Abu Khurma,&nbsp;Adeeb Jarrah,&nbsp;Nagla Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of the study is to investigate the predictive roles of intellectual curiosity and perspective-taking on science achievement among Emirati early adolescents. Utilizing data from 24,600 participants of the 2022 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), this non-experimental, correlational study employs a Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) approach to explore these relationships. The study addresses four key research questions: (1) the direct impact of intellectual curiosity on science achievement, (2) the direct impact of perspective-taking on science achievement, (3) the combined predictive power of intellectual curiosity and perspective-taking, and (4) the mediating role of perspective-taking in the relationship between intellectual curiosity and science achievement. Results reveal that intellectual curiosity significantly predicts science achievement with a path coefficient of 0.19. Perspective-taking also shows a substantial direct effect with a path coefficient of 0.15 and additionally mediates the relationship between intellectual curiosity and science achievement with an indirect path coefficient of 0.09. These findings demonstrate the significant influence of these cognitive skills on educational outcomes, suggesting that both intellectual curiosity and perspective-taking are crucial for enhancing science achievement. This underscores the importance of integrating educational strategies that foster these cognitive skills to improve science education outcomes. Recommendations for educational policy include enhancing curricula to foster curiosity and perspective-taking and developing assessments that evaluate these competencies. The study highlights the need for further research using longitudinal designs and intervention studies to confirm these findings and refine educational practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate the predictive roles of intellectual curiosity and perspective-taking on science achievement among Emirati early adolescents. Utilizing data from 24,600 participants of the 2022 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), this non-experimental, correlational study employs a Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) approach to explore these relationships. The study addresses four key research questions: (1) the direct impact of intellectual curiosity on science achievement, (2) the direct impact of perspective-taking on science achievement, (3) the combined predictive power of intellectual curiosity and perspective-taking, and (4) the mediating role of perspective-taking in the relationship between intellectual curiosity and science achievement. Results reveal that intellectual curiosity significantly predicts science achievement with a path coefficient of 0.19. Perspective-taking also shows a substantial direct effect with a path coefficient of 0.15 and additionally mediates the relationship between intellectual curiosity and science achievement with an indirect path coefficient of 0.09. These findings demonstrate the significant influence of these cognitive skills on educational outcomes, suggesting that both intellectual curiosity and perspective-taking are crucial for enhancing science achievement. This underscores the importance of integrating educational strategies that foster these cognitive skills to improve science education outcomes. Recommendations for educational policy include enhancing curricula to foster curiosity and perspective-taking and developing assessments that evaluate these competencies. The study highlights the need for further research using longitudinal designs and intervention studies to confirm these findings and refine educational practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PISA 2022对求知欲、换位思考和科学成就的洞察:检验中介途径
本研究的目的是调查阿联酋早期青少年的求知欲和观点采取对科学成就的预测作用。利用2022年国际学生评估项目(PISA) 24,600名参与者的数据,这项非实验的相关性研究采用结构方程建模偏最小二乘(SEM-PLS)方法来探索这些关系。本研究探讨了四个关键研究问题:(1)求知欲对科学成就的直接影响;(2)换位思考对科学成就的直接影响;(3)求知欲与换位思考的联合预测能力;(4)换位思考在求知欲与科学成就关系中的中介作用。结果表明,求知欲显著预测科学成就,通径系数为0.19。换位思考也表现出显著的直接效应,路径系数为0.15;此外,换位思考还以0.09的间接路径系数中介了求知欲与科学成就之间的关系。这些发现证明了这些认知技能对教育成果的重大影响,表明求知欲和换位思考对提高科学成就至关重要。这强调了整合培养这些认知技能的教育策略以改善科学教育成果的重要性。对教育政策的建议包括加强课程,以培养好奇心和换位思考能力,并制定评估这些能力的评估方法。该研究强调需要进一步的研究,使用纵向设计和干预研究来证实这些发现并改进教育实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Analysis of current didactic models in digital education: A systematic literature review Sustainability in business and economics education in South African universities: Whose agenda is it? The impact of commercial board games on secondary school mathematics performance and thinking skills Exploring primary children's STEM attitudes and career aspirations following a 14-week iSTEM intervention Creative thinking, mathematics achievement, and well-being: A multilevel analysis of Spanish students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1