Evaluation of sustainable energy use in sugarcane production: A holistic model from planting to harvest and life cycle assessment

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2025.100617
Molood Behnia , Mohammad Ghahderijani , Ali Kaab , Marjan Behnia
{"title":"Evaluation of sustainable energy use in sugarcane production: A holistic model from planting to harvest and life cycle assessment","authors":"Molood Behnia ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ghahderijani ,&nbsp;Ali Kaab ,&nbsp;Marjan Behnia","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study evaluates energy consumption in sugarcane production at the Salman Farsi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company in Khuzestan province, Iran, comparing plant cane and ratoon cycles. Plant cane show higher energy input (124,912.32 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>) and output (107,530.44 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>) than ratoon farms (80,317.81 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup> input and 87,586.68 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup> output). However, ratoon cycles are more energy efficient. To lessen energy use in plant cane, the research recommends strategies like minimizing machinery use, adopting reduced and no-tillage practices, and employing efficient irrigation and spraying methods. The environmental assessment reveals that plant cane have greater negative impacts on human health, ecosystems, and resources. Specifically, human health impacts are 3.69 DALY for planted systems versus 1.54 for ratoon systems, indicating greater health risks from initial plantings. Ecosystem impacts also show more local species loss in planted systems (6.25E-04 species.yr compared to 4.11E-04 for ratoon). Moreover, resource costs are higher for planted systems at 320.12 USD2013 of sugarcane, compared to 210.46 USD2013 for ratoon production. The analysis compares Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models for predicting energy outputs and environmental effects. Artificial Neural Network models excel in predicting impacts for planted sugarcane, whereas Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models are more accurate for ratoon production and are computationally more efficient. The findings emphasize the need for improved sustainability and efficiency in sugarcane production through better energy management and reduced environmental impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluates energy consumption in sugarcane production at the Salman Farsi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company in Khuzestan province, Iran, comparing plant cane and ratoon cycles. Plant cane show higher energy input (124,912.32 MJ ha-1) and output (107,530.44 MJ ha-1) than ratoon farms (80,317.81 MJ ha-1 input and 87,586.68 MJ ha-1 output). However, ratoon cycles are more energy efficient. To lessen energy use in plant cane, the research recommends strategies like minimizing machinery use, adopting reduced and no-tillage practices, and employing efficient irrigation and spraying methods. The environmental assessment reveals that plant cane have greater negative impacts on human health, ecosystems, and resources. Specifically, human health impacts are 3.69 DALY for planted systems versus 1.54 for ratoon systems, indicating greater health risks from initial plantings. Ecosystem impacts also show more local species loss in planted systems (6.25E-04 species.yr compared to 4.11E-04 for ratoon). Moreover, resource costs are higher for planted systems at 320.12 USD2013 of sugarcane, compared to 210.46 USD2013 for ratoon production. The analysis compares Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models for predicting energy outputs and environmental effects. Artificial Neural Network models excel in predicting impacts for planted sugarcane, whereas Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models are more accurate for ratoon production and are computationally more efficient. The findings emphasize the need for improved sustainability and efficiency in sugarcane production through better energy management and reduced environmental impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Soil quality dynamics in response to land-use management types and slope positions in northeastern highlands of Ethiopia Understanding flood and drought extremes under a changing climate in the Blue Nile Basin: A review Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in technology revolution 5.0: New insights in Vietnam The carbon footprint of football fans: Emotional and rational correlates of home and away game travel Fisheries performance indicators for assessing the ecological sustainability of wild-caught seafood products in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1