Evaluation of sustainable energy use in sugarcane production: A holistic model from planting to harvest and life cycle assessment

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2025.100617
Molood Behnia , Mohammad Ghahderijani , Ali Kaab , Marjan Behnia
{"title":"Evaluation of sustainable energy use in sugarcane production: A holistic model from planting to harvest and life cycle assessment","authors":"Molood Behnia ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ghahderijani ,&nbsp;Ali Kaab ,&nbsp;Marjan Behnia","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study evaluates energy consumption in sugarcane production at the Salman Farsi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company in Khuzestan province, Iran, comparing plant cane and ratoon cycles. Plant cane show higher energy input (124,912.32 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>) and output (107,530.44 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>) than ratoon farms (80,317.81 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup> input and 87,586.68 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup> output). However, ratoon cycles are more energy efficient. To lessen energy use in plant cane, the research recommends strategies like minimizing machinery use, adopting reduced and no-tillage practices, and employing efficient irrigation and spraying methods. The environmental assessment reveals that plant cane have greater negative impacts on human health, ecosystems, and resources. Specifically, human health impacts are 3.69 DALY for planted systems versus 1.54 for ratoon systems, indicating greater health risks from initial plantings. Ecosystem impacts also show more local species loss in planted systems (6.25E-04 species.yr compared to 4.11E-04 for ratoon). Moreover, resource costs are higher for planted systems at 320.12 USD2013 of sugarcane, compared to 210.46 USD2013 for ratoon production. The analysis compares Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models for predicting energy outputs and environmental effects. Artificial Neural Network models excel in predicting impacts for planted sugarcane, whereas Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models are more accurate for ratoon production and are computationally more efficient. The findings emphasize the need for improved sustainability and efficiency in sugarcane production through better energy management and reduced environmental impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluates energy consumption in sugarcane production at the Salman Farsi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company in Khuzestan province, Iran, comparing plant cane and ratoon cycles. Plant cane show higher energy input (124,912.32 MJ ha-1) and output (107,530.44 MJ ha-1) than ratoon farms (80,317.81 MJ ha-1 input and 87,586.68 MJ ha-1 output). However, ratoon cycles are more energy efficient. To lessen energy use in plant cane, the research recommends strategies like minimizing machinery use, adopting reduced and no-tillage practices, and employing efficient irrigation and spraying methods. The environmental assessment reveals that plant cane have greater negative impacts on human health, ecosystems, and resources. Specifically, human health impacts are 3.69 DALY for planted systems versus 1.54 for ratoon systems, indicating greater health risks from initial plantings. Ecosystem impacts also show more local species loss in planted systems (6.25E-04 species.yr compared to 4.11E-04 for ratoon). Moreover, resource costs are higher for planted systems at 320.12 USD2013 of sugarcane, compared to 210.46 USD2013 for ratoon production. The analysis compares Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models for predicting energy outputs and environmental effects. Artificial Neural Network models excel in predicting impacts for planted sugarcane, whereas Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems models are more accurate for ratoon production and are computationally more efficient. The findings emphasize the need for improved sustainability and efficiency in sugarcane production through better energy management and reduced environmental impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘蔗生产中可持续能源利用的评估:从种植到收获的整体模型和生命周期评估
该研究评估了伊朗Khuzestan省Salman Farsi甘蔗农工业公司甘蔗生产中的能源消耗,比较了植物甘蔗和再生周期。甘蔗的能量输入(124,912.32 MJ ha-1)和输出(107,530.44 MJ ha-1)高于再生植物农场(80,317.81 MJ ha-1输入和87,586.68 MJ ha-1输出)。然而,再生循环更节能。为了减少甘蔗的能源消耗,该研究建议采取一些策略,如尽量减少机械的使用,采用减少和免耕的做法,以及采用有效的灌溉和喷洒方法。环境评价结果表明,甘蔗对人类健康、生态系统和资源的负面影响较大。具体而言,种植系统对人类健康的影响为3.69 DALY,而再生系统为1.54,表明初次种植的健康风险更大。生态系统影响还表明,种植系统的本地物种损失更多(6.25E-04)。与4.11E-04版本相比)。此外,种植系统的资源成本更高,甘蔗成本为320.12美元,而再生系统的资源成本为210.46美元。分析比较了人工神经网络和自适应神经模糊推理系统模型在预测能源输出和环境影响方面的应用。人工神经网络模型在预测甘蔗种植的影响方面表现出色,而自适应神经模糊推理系统模型在预测甘蔗生产方面更准确,计算效率更高。研究结果强调需要通过更好的能源管理和减少对环境的影响来提高甘蔗生产的可持续性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Sulphur addition has negative impacts on individual species abundance in natural plant species communities Understanding climate change-induced drought shocks and coping strategies of farmers in the Barind Tract Region, Bangladesh Impacts of climate change on water resources and farming community adaptation strategies in southwestern Ethiopia Citizen science data reliability enhancing scientific research: insights from an 11-year study in the Mediterranean Sea Tracking important site safeguard through different approaches to measuring the indicator of protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1