¿Afecta el número de bucles a los resultados de las faringoplastias barbadas? Un estudio comparativo entre dos técnicas

IF 0.9 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otorri.2024.07.005
Marina Carrasco Llatas , Paula Martínez Ruiz de Apodaca , Elena González Turienzo , Miguel Martínez Moreno , Felipe Domínguez Celis , Giovanni Cammaroto , Claudio Vicini
{"title":"¿Afecta el número de bucles a los resultados de las faringoplastias barbadas? Un estudio comparativo entre dos técnicas","authors":"Marina Carrasco Llatas ,&nbsp;Paula Martínez Ruiz de Apodaca ,&nbsp;Elena González Turienzo ,&nbsp;Miguel Martínez Moreno ,&nbsp;Felipe Domínguez Celis ,&nbsp;Giovanni Cammaroto ,&nbsp;Claudio Vicini","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical results in two different centers using barbed sutures with different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI &lt;<!--> <!-->10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"76 1","pages":"Pages 25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651924000967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical results in two different centers using barbed sutures with different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques.

Material and methods

This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.

Results

The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI < 10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.

Conclusion

Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.
期刊最新文献
Estudio prospectivo de la localización en pacientes con hipoacusia unilateral y asimétrica tratados con implante coclear Normoacusia y discriminación verbal en entornos sonoros reales ¿Afecta el número de bucles a los resultados de las faringoplastias barbadas? Un estudio comparativo entre dos técnicas Laryngeal chondrosarcoma, a 30-year series Nuevo nomenclátor de Otorrinolaringología de la SEORL-CCC - Anestesiología (SEDAR). Versión ejecutiva 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1