Analyzing micromobility patterns: A gender perspective on behavior and risk perception

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.044
Almudena Sanjurjo-de-No, Ana María Pérez-Zuriaga, Carlos Hortelano, Alfredo García
{"title":"Analyzing micromobility patterns: A gender perspective on behavior and risk perception","authors":"Almudena Sanjurjo-de-No,&nbsp;Ana María Pérez-Zuriaga,&nbsp;Carlos Hortelano,&nbsp;Alfredo García","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of micromobility vehicles, particularly e-scooters and bicycles, has seen significant growth in recent years, yet gender differences in usage patterns, behavior, and risk perception remain underexplored. This study aims to address this gap by analyzing gender-based differences in micromobility usage across various cycling infrastructures in Valencia, Spain. Several factors, such as speed, lateral positioning, and risk perception among male and female users of personal bicycles, public bike-sharing systems, and e-scooters, have been examined. Data was collected through video recordings across six different bike lanes. The results reveal that men tend to ride faster than women, particularly when using personal bicycles, though the differences in speed are minimal, especially for e-scooter users. Additionally, women exhibit a greater preference for riding farther from motorized traffic, especially in areas with higher traffic volume and speed. These findings highlight the importance of considering gender-specific needs in the design of micromobility infrastructure to improve safety and encourage broader usage, particularly among women. This study provides empirical evidence of gendered behaviors in micromobility use and offers practical recommendations for urban planners and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 1365-1382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of micromobility vehicles, particularly e-scooters and bicycles, has seen significant growth in recent years, yet gender differences in usage patterns, behavior, and risk perception remain underexplored. This study aims to address this gap by analyzing gender-based differences in micromobility usage across various cycling infrastructures in Valencia, Spain. Several factors, such as speed, lateral positioning, and risk perception among male and female users of personal bicycles, public bike-sharing systems, and e-scooters, have been examined. Data was collected through video recordings across six different bike lanes. The results reveal that men tend to ride faster than women, particularly when using personal bicycles, though the differences in speed are minimal, especially for e-scooter users. Additionally, women exhibit a greater preference for riding farther from motorized traffic, especially in areas with higher traffic volume and speed. These findings highlight the importance of considering gender-specific needs in the design of micromobility infrastructure to improve safety and encourage broader usage, particularly among women. This study provides empirical evidence of gendered behaviors in micromobility use and offers practical recommendations for urban planners and policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析微移动模式:行为和风险感知的性别视角
近年来,微型交通工具(尤其是电动滑板车和自行车)的使用有了显著增长,但在使用模式、行为和风险认知方面的性别差异仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在通过分析西班牙瓦伦西亚各种自行车基础设施中基于性别的微交通使用差异来解决这一差距。几个因素,如速度,横向定位,风险感知在个人自行车,公共自行车共享系统和电动滑板车的男性和女性用户中进行了研究。数据是通过六个不同自行车道的视频记录收集的。结果显示,男性往往比女性骑得快,尤其是在骑私人自行车的时候,尽管速度上的差异很小,尤其是在电动滑板车用户身上。此外,女性更倾向于在远离机动车的地方骑行,尤其是在交通流量和速度较高的地区。这些发现强调了在设计微型交通基础设施时考虑到性别特定需求的重要性,以提高安全性并鼓励更广泛的使用,特别是在妇女中。本研究为微交通工具使用中的性别行为提供了实证证据,并为城市规划者和决策者提供了实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploiting the benevolent machine: Psychological antecedents of human drivers' strategic exploitation intentions toward autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic Integrated training to improve young novice drivers' hazard management and speed management skills: a driving simulator study Motorcycle safety in Vietnam: Revising and expanding the MRBQ to reflect emerging urban risks Effects of Visual Field Loss on Drivers' Explicit and Implicit Initial Trust Preferences: Full Driving Automation versus Themselves Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1