What’s your type? A taxonomy of pedestrian route choice behaviour in cities

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.012
Marcin Wozniak , Gabriele Filomena , Adam Wronkowski
{"title":"What’s your type? A taxonomy of pedestrian route choice behaviour in cities","authors":"Marcin Wozniak ,&nbsp;Gabriele Filomena ,&nbsp;Adam Wronkowski","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pedestrian route choice behaviour has captivated academic inquiry for over a century. Its study has shaped urban planning and influenced the design of more sustainable urban spaces and the discourse on just cities. While existing research has primarily examined the influence of configurational factors or urban elements on pedestrian movement, their interplay remains poorly understood. This paper addresses this gap by examining how the configurational properties of the street network and the distribution of urban elements shape pedestrian route choice behaviour. Walking tasks and in-depth interviews were conducted in Poznań (Poland) with 18 participants. The 36 routes and their attributes were tracked using GPS devices, while the interviews provided insights into the participants’ decision-making processes and preferences. The analysis resulted in the definition of a taxonomy of pedestrian types based on their route choice behaviour. These types encompass various preferences and strategies, including prioritising comfort, rational decisions, spontaneity, reliance on landmarks, and environmental cues. Moreover, the analysis revealed variations in route's geometry, length, and predictability across the five types. Overall, our findings emphasise the multifaceted nature of pedestrian behaviour as influenced by a combination of “objective” environmental factors, subjective perceptions, and emergent dynamic factors. Elements like weather, crowds, traffic, noise, seasonality, and time of day emerged as additional but significant determinants of decisions. Finally, while green areas and landmarks did impact route choice behaviour, other more nuanced elements - such as paving patterns, storefronts, or prior experiences and memories - also played a role in shaping the participants’ routes, adding further uncertainty around pedestrian behavioural patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 1257-1274"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedestrian route choice behaviour has captivated academic inquiry for over a century. Its study has shaped urban planning and influenced the design of more sustainable urban spaces and the discourse on just cities. While existing research has primarily examined the influence of configurational factors or urban elements on pedestrian movement, their interplay remains poorly understood. This paper addresses this gap by examining how the configurational properties of the street network and the distribution of urban elements shape pedestrian route choice behaviour. Walking tasks and in-depth interviews were conducted in Poznań (Poland) with 18 participants. The 36 routes and their attributes were tracked using GPS devices, while the interviews provided insights into the participants’ decision-making processes and preferences. The analysis resulted in the definition of a taxonomy of pedestrian types based on their route choice behaviour. These types encompass various preferences and strategies, including prioritising comfort, rational decisions, spontaneity, reliance on landmarks, and environmental cues. Moreover, the analysis revealed variations in route's geometry, length, and predictability across the five types. Overall, our findings emphasise the multifaceted nature of pedestrian behaviour as influenced by a combination of “objective” environmental factors, subjective perceptions, and emergent dynamic factors. Elements like weather, crowds, traffic, noise, seasonality, and time of day emerged as additional but significant determinants of decisions. Finally, while green areas and landmarks did impact route choice behaviour, other more nuanced elements - such as paving patterns, storefronts, or prior experiences and memories - also played a role in shaping the participants’ routes, adding further uncertainty around pedestrian behavioural patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你喜欢什么类型的?城市行人路径选择行为的分类学
一个多世纪以来,行人的路线选择行为一直吸引着学术界的研究。它的研究塑造了城市规划,影响了更可持续的城市空间的设计和关于公平城市的论述。虽然现有的研究主要考察了地形因素或城市因素对行人运动的影响,但它们之间的相互作用仍然知之甚少。本文通过研究街道网络的配置属性和城市元素的分布如何影响行人的路线选择行为来解决这一差距。行走任务和深度访谈在波兹纳伊(波兰)与18名参与者进行。36条路线及其属性使用GPS设备进行跟踪,而访谈提供了对参与者决策过程和偏好的见解。分析的结果是根据行人的路线选择行为定义了行人类型的分类。这些类型包含了不同的偏好和策略,包括舒适度、理性决策、自发性、对地标和环境线索的依赖。此外,分析还揭示了五种类型的路线在几何形状、长度和可预测性方面的差异。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了行人行为的多面性,受到“客观”环境因素、主观感知和紧急动态因素的综合影响。天气、人群、交通、噪音、季节性和一天中的时间等因素成为了决策的额外但重要的决定因素。最后,虽然绿地和地标确实会影响人们的路线选择行为,但其他更细微的因素——如铺路模式、店面或之前的经历和记忆——也在塑造参与者的路线方面发挥了作用,这进一步增加了行人行为模式的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment Who's in charge: Drivers or voice assistants? How power dynamics shape emotions and takeover behavior in automated driving Predictive role of empathic attention bias on driver traffic violations and the empathy-enhancing effects of intelligent driving companionship Active school travel and spatial cognition: exploring associations and moderating roles among children Why aren't electric vehicles taking over? Exploring the drivers and barriers to adoption: a systematic review, theoretical framework, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1