Overtaking automated truck platoons: Effects of platoon organisations and traffic situation on driving behaviours of nearby manual vehicle drivers

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.026
Zijian Lin , Feng Chen , İbrahim Öztürk , Natasha Merat
{"title":"Overtaking automated truck platoons: Effects of platoon organisations and traffic situation on driving behaviours of nearby manual vehicle drivers","authors":"Zijian Lin ,&nbsp;Feng Chen ,&nbsp;İbrahim Öztürk ,&nbsp;Natasha Merat","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated truck platooning is a promising technology that is expected to be mainstream within the next decade. For the foreseeable future, automated truck platoons will coexist and interact with human drivers. Resembling a train-like formation, automated truck platoons may present challenges for drivers wishing to overtake them, and it is not currently clear how these new formations affect driver behaviour. Therefore, this paper aims to examine driver behaviours in the overtaking process under various platoon organisations. A high-fidelity driving simulation experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of platoon speed (80 km/h and 100 km/h), size (three trucks and five trucks), inner gap (5 m and 25 m) and the surrounding traffic situation, e.g., the presence of a lead vehicle, on drivers’ overtaking behaviour. Thirty-eight participants were recruited in the experiment. Results revealed that compared to 80 km/h conditions, the 100 km/h conditions prompted more drivers to exhibit extreme behaviours—either failing to overtake or performing a risky overtaking. Regarding platoon size, drivers tended to deviate farther from the lane center to maintain a larger lateral distance from the platoon under five-truck conditions. With respect to the inner gap, a 25 m inner gap significantly reduced the proportion of successful overtaking maneuvers. Moreover, in critical conditions, a 5 m inner gap extended drivers’ response time but did not significantly impact collision probability. The presence of the lead vehicle increased drivers’ mental workload and impaired longitudinal stability. These findings may offer insights for managing automated truck platoons. For instance, the platoon speed and inner gap can be regulated in different traffic conditions, to optimize efficiency, while ensuring safety for all road users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 1208-1228"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated truck platooning is a promising technology that is expected to be mainstream within the next decade. For the foreseeable future, automated truck platoons will coexist and interact with human drivers. Resembling a train-like formation, automated truck platoons may present challenges for drivers wishing to overtake them, and it is not currently clear how these new formations affect driver behaviour. Therefore, this paper aims to examine driver behaviours in the overtaking process under various platoon organisations. A high-fidelity driving simulation experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of platoon speed (80 km/h and 100 km/h), size (three trucks and five trucks), inner gap (5 m and 25 m) and the surrounding traffic situation, e.g., the presence of a lead vehicle, on drivers’ overtaking behaviour. Thirty-eight participants were recruited in the experiment. Results revealed that compared to 80 km/h conditions, the 100 km/h conditions prompted more drivers to exhibit extreme behaviours—either failing to overtake or performing a risky overtaking. Regarding platoon size, drivers tended to deviate farther from the lane center to maintain a larger lateral distance from the platoon under five-truck conditions. With respect to the inner gap, a 25 m inner gap significantly reduced the proportion of successful overtaking maneuvers. Moreover, in critical conditions, a 5 m inner gap extended drivers’ response time but did not significantly impact collision probability. The presence of the lead vehicle increased drivers’ mental workload and impaired longitudinal stability. These findings may offer insights for managing automated truck platoons. For instance, the platoon speed and inner gap can be regulated in different traffic conditions, to optimize efficiency, while ensuring safety for all road users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超车自动卡车队列:队列组织和交通状况对附近手动车辆驾驶员驾驶行为的影响
自动卡车队列是一项很有前途的技术,预计将在未来十年内成为主流。在可预见的未来,自动卡车排将与人类驾驶员共存并互动。与火车编队类似,自动卡车排可能会给希望超过它们的司机带来挑战,目前尚不清楚这些新编队如何影响司机的行为。因此,本文旨在研究不同排组织下超车过程中的驾驶员行为。通过高保真驾驶仿真实验,研究了车队速度(80 km/h和100 km/h)、车队规模(3辆卡车和5辆卡车)、车队内部间距(5 m和25 m)以及车辆前导等周围交通状况对驾驶员超车行为的影响。实验招募了38名参与者。结果显示,与80公里/小时的车速相比,100公里/小时的车速会促使更多司机表现出极端行为——要么不超车,要么冒险超车。在车队规模方面,在五辆卡车的情况下,驾驶员倾向于远离车道中心,以保持与车队的较大横向距离。对于内间隙,25 m的内间隙显著降低了成功超车的比例。在临界工况下,5 m的内间隙延长了驾驶员的响应时间,但对碰撞概率影响不显著。前车的存在增加了驾驶员的精神负荷,降低了纵向稳定性。这些发现可能为自动化卡车排的管理提供见解。例如,可以在不同的交通条件下调节排速和内部间隙,以优化效率,同时确保所有道路使用者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment Who's in charge: Drivers or voice assistants? How power dynamics shape emotions and takeover behavior in automated driving Predictive role of empathic attention bias on driver traffic violations and the empathy-enhancing effects of intelligent driving companionship Active school travel and spatial cognition: exploring associations and moderating roles among children Why aren't electric vehicles taking over? Exploring the drivers and barriers to adoption: a systematic review, theoretical framework, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1