Comparative analysis of UAV-based LiDAR and photogrammetric systems for the detection of terrain anomalies in a historical conflict landscape

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2024.100191
Marcel Storch , Benjamin Kisliuk , Thomas Jarmer , Björn Waske , Norbert de Lange
{"title":"Comparative analysis of UAV-based LiDAR and photogrammetric systems for the detection of terrain anomalies in a historical conflict landscape","authors":"Marcel Storch ,&nbsp;Benjamin Kisliuk ,&nbsp;Thomas Jarmer ,&nbsp;Björn Waske ,&nbsp;Norbert de Lange","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The documentation of historical artefacts and cultural heritage using high-resolution data obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is of paramount importance in the preservation of historical knowledge. This study compares three UAV-based systems for the detection of historically relevant terrain anomalies in a conflict landscape. Two laser scanners, a high-end (RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV) and a lower priced model (DJI Zenmuse L1), along with a cost-effective optical camera system (photogrammetry using Structure from Motion, SfM) were employed in two study sites with different densities of vegetation. In the study area with deciduous trees and little low vegetation, the DJI Zenmuse L1 system performs comparably to the RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV, with higher completeness but lower correctness. The SfM method demonstrated inferior performance with respect to correctness and the F1-score, yet achieved comparable or higher completeness values compared to the laser scanners (maximum 1.0, median 0.84). In the study area characterized by dense near-ground vegetation, the detection results are less optimal. However, the RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV system still demonstrates superior results in anomaly detection (F1-score maximum 0.61, median 0.53) compared to the other systems. The DJI Zenmuse L1 data showed lower performance (F1-score maximum 0.56, median 0.46). Both laser scanners exhibited enhanced results in comparison to the SfM approach, with a maximum F1-score of 0.12. Hence, the SfM method is viable under specific conditions, such as defoliated trees without dense low vegetation. Therefore, lower-cost systems can offer cost-effective alternatives to the high-end LiDAR system in suitable environments. However, limitations persist in densely vegetated areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100191"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The documentation of historical artefacts and cultural heritage using high-resolution data obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is of paramount importance in the preservation of historical knowledge. This study compares three UAV-based systems for the detection of historically relevant terrain anomalies in a conflict landscape. Two laser scanners, a high-end (RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV) and a lower priced model (DJI Zenmuse L1), along with a cost-effective optical camera system (photogrammetry using Structure from Motion, SfM) were employed in two study sites with different densities of vegetation. In the study area with deciduous trees and little low vegetation, the DJI Zenmuse L1 system performs comparably to the RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV, with higher completeness but lower correctness. The SfM method demonstrated inferior performance with respect to correctness and the F1-score, yet achieved comparable or higher completeness values compared to the laser scanners (maximum 1.0, median 0.84). In the study area characterized by dense near-ground vegetation, the detection results are less optimal. However, the RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV system still demonstrates superior results in anomaly detection (F1-score maximum 0.61, median 0.53) compared to the other systems. The DJI Zenmuse L1 data showed lower performance (F1-score maximum 0.56, median 0.46). Both laser scanners exhibited enhanced results in comparison to the SfM approach, with a maximum F1-score of 0.12. Hence, the SfM method is viable under specific conditions, such as defoliated trees without dense low vegetation. Therefore, lower-cost systems can offer cost-effective alternatives to the high-end LiDAR system in suitable environments. However, limitations persist in densely vegetated areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combination of GEOBIA and data-driven approach for grassland habitat mapping in the Alta Murgia National Park A global Swin-Unet Sentinel-2 surface reflectance-based cloud and cloud shadow detection algorithm for the NASA Harmonized Landsat Sentinel-2 (HLS) dataset Urban informal settlements interpretation via a novel multi-modal Kolmogorov–Arnold fusion network by exploring hierarchical features from remote sensing and street view images New joint estimation method for emissivity and temperature distribution based on a Kriged Marginalized Particle Filter: Application to simulated infrared thermal image sequences Evaluating the robustness of Bayesian flood mapping with Sentinel-1 data: A multi-event validation study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1