Connections can make a difference: Understanding EV owners’ motivations for agreeing to share their HCSs in megacities through a mixed methods approach study

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.007
Li Li , Rui Zhang , Yiming Yuan , Matthew Harris , Hua Cai , Beining Chen , Xinyi Zhang , Jianjun Wang , Ziyang Peng
{"title":"Connections can make a difference: Understanding EV owners’ motivations for agreeing to share their HCSs in megacities through a mixed methods approach study","authors":"Li Li ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiming Yuan ,&nbsp;Matthew Harris ,&nbsp;Hua Cai ,&nbsp;Beining Chen ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianjun Wang ,&nbsp;Ziyang Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the factors that drive home charging station (HCS) owners’ intentions to share is crucial for promoting broader HCS sharing adoption in megacities. This study uses a mixed-methods approach, starting with qualitative in-depth interviews to identify key factors and establish a preliminary hypotheses framework. A quantitative survey, combined with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), is then employed to test these hypotheses across different sharing groups: neighbors, virtual community members, and strangers. The findings reveal that HCS owners are more likely to hesitate to share with strangers due to concerns about disruptions created by outsiders, which underscores the fact that a connection between HCS owners and users, either in physical or virtual context, can boost sharing intentions. Establishing a connection between HCS owners and the potential users can increase residents’ sense of belonging and enhance their motivation to help (MH), which was found to directly influence HCS owners’ willingness to share with neighbors, while its impact on HCS owners’ sharing intention within virtual communities is indirect, moderated by the necessity to utilize idle resources (NU). Perceived economic benefits (PE) indirectly affect HCS owners’ sharing intention through the mediation of MH, highlighting the complex interplay between altruism and economic motivations. These insights offer actionable recommendations for policymakers aiming to increase HCS sharing rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 180-210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the factors that drive home charging station (HCS) owners’ intentions to share is crucial for promoting broader HCS sharing adoption in megacities. This study uses a mixed-methods approach, starting with qualitative in-depth interviews to identify key factors and establish a preliminary hypotheses framework. A quantitative survey, combined with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), is then employed to test these hypotheses across different sharing groups: neighbors, virtual community members, and strangers. The findings reveal that HCS owners are more likely to hesitate to share with strangers due to concerns about disruptions created by outsiders, which underscores the fact that a connection between HCS owners and users, either in physical or virtual context, can boost sharing intentions. Establishing a connection between HCS owners and the potential users can increase residents’ sense of belonging and enhance their motivation to help (MH), which was found to directly influence HCS owners’ willingness to share with neighbors, while its impact on HCS owners’ sharing intention within virtual communities is indirect, moderated by the necessity to utilize idle resources (NU). Perceived economic benefits (PE) indirectly affect HCS owners’ sharing intention through the mediation of MH, highlighting the complex interplay between altruism and economic motivations. These insights offer actionable recommendations for policymakers aiming to increase HCS sharing rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the safety effect of traffic guidance sign alignment at expressway hybrid toll plazas Biosignal-based attention monitoring for evaluating train driver safety-relevant tasks Evaluating the effects of brake light flicker frequency on cognitive conspicuity during visual dark adaptation: A 360-degree simulated driving study To lose or not to lose one’s grip? A comparison of psychosocial predictors of risk-taking and accident involvement among French cyclists Factors influencing car owners’ intentions of using shared cars: An extension of the theory of planned behavior in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1