Evaluation of intervention for pedestrian‑vehicle collisions at unsignalized intersections in virtual reality environments: Short- and long-term effects

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.005
Bo Wang , Jian Zhang , Siyuan Liu , Xiaomeng Shi , Yu Qian
{"title":"Evaluation of intervention for pedestrian‑vehicle collisions at unsignalized intersections in virtual reality environments: Short- and long-term effects","authors":"Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Jian Zhang ,&nbsp;Siyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Shi ,&nbsp;Yu Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pedestrian-vehicle collisions are common at unsignalized intersections. While governments worldwide have implemented various interventions to reduce pedestrian crashes, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unexplored, particularly for sustainability. The study used a virtual reality technology-based approach to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of interventions on pedestrian-vehicle collisions. The short-term intervention (immediate intervention) effects were evaluated through a multi-factor index system. Furthermore, one repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to examine the link between the short-term intervention effects and compound mode, implementation period, and number of single interventions (N = 60). Moreover, the long-term intervention (lasting for six months) effect was evaluated using two indices: pedestrian-vehicle collision events (PCE) and pedestrian-vehicle collision self-intervention events (PCSE). Additionally, the effects of long-term intervention and their association with factors such as age, gender, and district were examined in the MAMOVA analysis (N = 44). Results showed that combined interventions exhibited better effects compared to single interventions. The implementation periods of interventions could impact the generation of optimal combined interventions. The efficacy of short-term intervention could not be determined by the number of single interventions alone. As the duration of intervention increases, there is a significant decrease in mean PCEs and an increase in mean PCSEs for each gender group. Older participants demonstrated a higher level of caution before crossing intersections compared to younger participants following long-term intervention. Participants closer to the city center were more likely to adopt preventive strategies for preventing pedestrian-vehicle collisions after long-term intervention. The observations from this study provided a basis for long-term developing countermeasures in the China to improve the ability of pedestrians to cross the road safely.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 147-163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedestrian-vehicle collisions are common at unsignalized intersections. While governments worldwide have implemented various interventions to reduce pedestrian crashes, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unexplored, particularly for sustainability. The study used a virtual reality technology-based approach to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of interventions on pedestrian-vehicle collisions. The short-term intervention (immediate intervention) effects were evaluated through a multi-factor index system. Furthermore, one repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to examine the link between the short-term intervention effects and compound mode, implementation period, and number of single interventions (N = 60). Moreover, the long-term intervention (lasting for six months) effect was evaluated using two indices: pedestrian-vehicle collision events (PCE) and pedestrian-vehicle collision self-intervention events (PCSE). Additionally, the effects of long-term intervention and their association with factors such as age, gender, and district were examined in the MAMOVA analysis (N = 44). Results showed that combined interventions exhibited better effects compared to single interventions. The implementation periods of interventions could impact the generation of optimal combined interventions. The efficacy of short-term intervention could not be determined by the number of single interventions alone. As the duration of intervention increases, there is a significant decrease in mean PCEs and an increase in mean PCSEs for each gender group. Older participants demonstrated a higher level of caution before crossing intersections compared to younger participants following long-term intervention. Participants closer to the city center were more likely to adopt preventive strategies for preventing pedestrian-vehicle collisions after long-term intervention. The observations from this study provided a basis for long-term developing countermeasures in the China to improve the ability of pedestrians to cross the road safely.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实环境中无信号交叉口行人与车辆碰撞干预评估:短期和长期影响
行人与车辆的碰撞在没有信号的十字路口很常见。虽然世界各国政府已经实施了各种干预措施来减少行人碰撞,但这些干预措施的有效性仍未得到探索,特别是在可持续性方面。该研究使用基于虚拟现实技术的方法来评估干预措施对行人与车辆碰撞的短期和长期影响。通过多因素指标体系评价短期干预(即刻干预)效果。此外,采用重复测量方差分析(repeated-measures ANOVA)来检验短期干预效果与复合模式、实施周期和单一干预数量之间的联系(N = 60)。采用行人-车辆碰撞事件(PCE)和行人-车辆碰撞自我干预事件(PCSE)两项指标评价长期干预(持续6个月)的效果。此外,在MAMOVA分析中,对长期干预的效果及其与年龄、性别和地区等因素的关系进行了检验(N = 44)。结果表明,联合干预比单一干预效果更好。干预措施的实施周期可能影响最佳组合干预措施的产生。短期干预的效果不能仅由单一干预的数量来确定。随着干预时间的延长,各性别群体的平均pce显著下降,平均pce显著上升。与长期干预后的年轻参与者相比,年龄较大的参与者在过十字路口时表现出更高的谨慎程度。在长期干预后,离市中心更近的参与者更有可能采取预防策略来防止行人与车辆的碰撞。本研究结果可为中国提高行人安全过马路能力的长期发展对策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Investigating risky riding behaviors among young motorcyclists in Bangladesh using a modified motorcycle rider behavior questionnaire Whose safety should come first in case of an unavoidable crash involving a driverless passenger vehicle? a nationwide snapshot of public perceptions and expectations Understanding driver visual distraction and its relationship with speeding: Insights from naturalistic driving data Impact analysis of commuting on multidimensional well-being: The mediation effects of social network and travel satisfaction Scales and inventories in traffic psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1