Safety evaluation and prediction of overtaking behaviors in heterogeneous traffic considering dynamic trust and automated driving styles

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.020
Jie Pan, Jing Shi
{"title":"Safety evaluation and prediction of overtaking behaviors in heterogeneous traffic considering dynamic trust and automated driving styles","authors":"Jie Pan,&nbsp;Jing Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated vehicles (AVs) face a critical need to evaluate and predict the risk of various driving maneuvers, especially in complex driving scenarios such as overtaking human-driven vehicles (HDVs). However, overtaking safety performance evaluation and prediction rarely take into account dynamic trust and AV driving styles. Moreover, the adequacy of the time window length for data collection prior to overtaking, critical for risk prediction, remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate overtaking safety performance on two-lane highways considering drivers’ dynamic trust and different AV driving styles, and predict overtaking risk focusing on the impact of different time window lengths. 47 participants were tasked with a simulated overtaking experiment involving both impeding and opposite automated vehicles (IAV and OAV) that exhibited either defensive or aggressive driving styles. Dynamic trust and subjective risk were assessed through a questionnaire after each overtaking maneuver, and objective risk was evaluated using time-to-collision-threshold Driving Risk Field method. Results show that the driving styles of IAV and OAV significantly impacted dynamic trust, objective risk and subjective risk. As dynamic trust in AVs increases, subjective risk decreases but an apparent rise in objective risk is noted, highlighting the importance of controlling over-trust. Results also illustrate that an aggressive IAV leads to a reduction of both following distance to the IAV and lateral distance to the roadside. Additionally, the time window length significantly influenced the prediction performance and a 1.5-second window was found to be optimal using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine model, achieving an accuracy of 92.3% and an F1-score of 0.905. By incorporating this insight, AVs can better anticipate and respond to the intentions of human drivers, leading to safer interactions on the road.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 383-398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AVs) face a critical need to evaluate and predict the risk of various driving maneuvers, especially in complex driving scenarios such as overtaking human-driven vehicles (HDVs). However, overtaking safety performance evaluation and prediction rarely take into account dynamic trust and AV driving styles. Moreover, the adequacy of the time window length for data collection prior to overtaking, critical for risk prediction, remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate overtaking safety performance on two-lane highways considering drivers’ dynamic trust and different AV driving styles, and predict overtaking risk focusing on the impact of different time window lengths. 47 participants were tasked with a simulated overtaking experiment involving both impeding and opposite automated vehicles (IAV and OAV) that exhibited either defensive or aggressive driving styles. Dynamic trust and subjective risk were assessed through a questionnaire after each overtaking maneuver, and objective risk was evaluated using time-to-collision-threshold Driving Risk Field method. Results show that the driving styles of IAV and OAV significantly impacted dynamic trust, objective risk and subjective risk. As dynamic trust in AVs increases, subjective risk decreases but an apparent rise in objective risk is noted, highlighting the importance of controlling over-trust. Results also illustrate that an aggressive IAV leads to a reduction of both following distance to the IAV and lateral distance to the roadside. Additionally, the time window length significantly influenced the prediction performance and a 1.5-second window was found to be optimal using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine model, achieving an accuracy of 92.3% and an F1-score of 0.905. By incorporating this insight, AVs can better anticipate and respond to the intentions of human drivers, leading to safer interactions on the road.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑动态信任和自动驾驶风格的异构交通超车行为安全评价与预测
自动驾驶汽车(AVs)面临着评估和预测各种驾驶动作风险的迫切需求,尤其是在超车等复杂驾驶场景下。然而,超车安全性能评价与预测很少考虑动态信任和自动驾驶风格。此外,超车前收集数据的时间窗长度是否足够,这对风险预测至关重要,但仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估考虑驾驶员动态信任和不同自动驾驶风格的双车道公路超车安全性能,并针对不同时间窗长度的影响预测超车风险。47名参与者接受了一项模拟超车实验,实验中有阻碍和对面的自动驾驶汽车(IAV和OAV),这些自动驾驶汽车要么表现出防御性的驾驶风格,要么表现出攻击性的驾驶风格。在每次超车动作后通过问卷评估动态信任和主观风险,使用碰撞阈值时间驾驶风险场法评估客观风险。结果表明,内部人与外部人的驾驶方式对动态信任、客观风险和主观风险均有显著影响。随着自动驾驶汽车动态信任的增加,主观风险降低,但客观风险明显上升,突出了控制过度信任的重要性。结果还表明,侵略性的IAV会减少到IAV的跟随距离和到路边的侧向距离。此外,时间窗长度显著影响预测性能,使用Light Gradient Boosting Machine模型发现1.5秒窗口是最优的,准确率为92.3%,f1得分为0.905。通过整合这种洞察力,自动驾驶汽车可以更好地预测和响应人类驾驶员的意图,从而实现更安全的道路互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploiting the benevolent machine: Psychological antecedents of human drivers' strategic exploitation intentions toward autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic Integrated training to improve young novice drivers' hazard management and speed management skills: a driving simulator study Motorcycle safety in Vietnam: Revising and expanding the MRBQ to reflect emerging urban risks Effects of Visual Field Loss on Drivers' Explicit and Implicit Initial Trust Preferences: Full Driving Automation versus Themselves Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1