Perceptions toward pedestrians and micromobility devices in off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.021
Amir Hassanpour, Alexander Bigazzi
{"title":"Perceptions toward pedestrians and micromobility devices in off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada","authors":"Amir Hassanpour,&nbsp;Alexander Bigazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As micromobility or personal mobility devices (PMD) expand and evolve for urban transportation, there is increasing concern about the comfort and safety of off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths. While there is a growing literature on the impacts of electric bicycles and scooters, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the comfort implications of the diverse array of micromobility devices currently in use. In this study we 1) characterize perceptions of comfort for people sharing off-street transportation facilities with pedestrians and 24 types of PMD, 2) examine how perceptions of comfort are affected by the perceiver, device, and contextual variables, and 3) investigate the disparity between actual and perceived micromobility mode shares and speeds. We collected data using a quasi-intercept survey of path users at 12 locations in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada, which were matched with location-specific volumes and speeds classified by PMD type. Results indicate that, despite an<!--> <!-->overestimation of the prevalence and speed of new forms of PMD, people are predominantly comfortable sharing with most devices except sit-down electric (moped-style) scooters. Pedestrians are less comfortable sharing with electric devices than are people using other PMDs. Model results show that motorized PMD would have to go 9 km/hr slower than the equivalent non-motorized device to have the same impact on comfort. Recommendations include modernizing PMD regulations, working to eliminate the use of sit-down electric scooters on off-street facilities, lowering thresholds for separating pedestrians on multi-use paths, and continued monitoring of speed and comfort impacts from evolving PMD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 951-964"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500021X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As micromobility or personal mobility devices (PMD) expand and evolve for urban transportation, there is increasing concern about the comfort and safety of off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths. While there is a growing literature on the impacts of electric bicycles and scooters, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the comfort implications of the diverse array of micromobility devices currently in use. In this study we 1) characterize perceptions of comfort for people sharing off-street transportation facilities with pedestrians and 24 types of PMD, 2) examine how perceptions of comfort are affected by the perceiver, device, and contextual variables, and 3) investigate the disparity between actual and perceived micromobility mode shares and speeds. We collected data using a quasi-intercept survey of path users at 12 locations in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada, which were matched with location-specific volumes and speeds classified by PMD type. Results indicate that, despite an overestimation of the prevalence and speed of new forms of PMD, people are predominantly comfortable sharing with most devices except sit-down electric (moped-style) scooters. Pedestrians are less comfortable sharing with electric devices than are people using other PMDs. Model results show that motorized PMD would have to go 9 km/hr slower than the equivalent non-motorized device to have the same impact on comfort. Recommendations include modernizing PMD regulations, working to eliminate the use of sit-down electric scooters on off-street facilities, lowering thresholds for separating pedestrians on multi-use paths, and continued monitoring of speed and comfort impacts from evolving PMD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对加拿大温哥华市区非街道自行车设施和多用途路径中行人和微移动设备的看法
随着微型交通或个人移动设备(PMD)在城市交通中的扩展和发展,人们越来越关注非街道自行车设施和多用途路径的舒适性和安全性。虽然关于电动自行车和踏板车的影响的文献越来越多,但我们对目前使用的各种微型移动设备的舒适性影响缺乏全面的了解。在本研究中,我们1)描述了与行人和24种类型的PMD共享非街道交通设施的人的舒适度感知;2)研究了舒适度感知如何受到感知者、设备和上下文变量的影响;3)调查了实际和感知的微移动模式份额和速度之间的差异。我们对加拿大温哥华市区12个地点的道路用户进行了准截距调查,收集了数据,并根据PMD类型对特定地点的体积和速度进行了匹配。结果表明,尽管高估了新型PMD的流行程度和速度,但人们基本上愿意与大多数设备共享,除了坐式电动(轻便摩托车式)滑板车。与使用其他pmd的人相比,行人更不愿意使用电子设备。模型结果表明,电动PMD必须比同等的非电动PMD慢9公里/小时,才能对舒适性产生相同的影响。建议包括使PMD法规现代化,努力消除在非街道设施上使用坐式电动滑板车,降低在多用途道路上分隔行人的门槛,并继续监测PMD发展对速度和舒适度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploiting the benevolent machine: Psychological antecedents of human drivers' strategic exploitation intentions toward autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic Integrated training to improve young novice drivers' hazard management and speed management skills: a driving simulator study Motorcycle safety in Vietnam: Revising and expanding the MRBQ to reflect emerging urban risks Effects of Visual Field Loss on Drivers' Explicit and Implicit Initial Trust Preferences: Full Driving Automation versus Themselves Walking school buses and their success (or failure) determinants: A thematic analysis of parental active school travel insights in Ferrara through the lens of social capital theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1