Perceptions toward pedestrians and micromobility devices in off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.021
Amir Hassanpour, Alexander Bigazzi
{"title":"Perceptions toward pedestrians and micromobility devices in off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada","authors":"Amir Hassanpour,&nbsp;Alexander Bigazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As micromobility or personal mobility devices (PMD) expand and evolve for urban transportation, there is increasing concern about the comfort and safety of off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths. While there is a growing literature on the impacts of electric bicycles and scooters, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the comfort implications of the diverse array of micromobility devices currently in use. In this study we 1) characterize perceptions of comfort for people sharing off-street transportation facilities with pedestrians and 24 types of PMD, 2) examine how perceptions of comfort are affected by the perceiver, device, and contextual variables, and 3) investigate the disparity between actual and perceived micromobility mode shares and speeds. We collected data using a quasi-intercept survey of path users at 12 locations in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada, which were matched with location-specific volumes and speeds classified by PMD type. Results indicate that, despite an<!--> <!-->overestimation of the prevalence and speed of new forms of PMD, people are predominantly comfortable sharing with most devices except sit-down electric (moped-style) scooters. Pedestrians are less comfortable sharing with electric devices than are people using other PMDs. Model results show that motorized PMD would have to go 9 km/hr slower than the equivalent non-motorized device to have the same impact on comfort. Recommendations include modernizing PMD regulations, working to eliminate the use of sit-down electric scooters on off-street facilities, lowering thresholds for separating pedestrians on multi-use paths, and continued monitoring of speed and comfort impacts from evolving PMD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 951-964"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500021X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As micromobility or personal mobility devices (PMD) expand and evolve for urban transportation, there is increasing concern about the comfort and safety of off-street cycling facilities and multi-use paths. While there is a growing literature on the impacts of electric bicycles and scooters, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the comfort implications of the diverse array of micromobility devices currently in use. In this study we 1) characterize perceptions of comfort for people sharing off-street transportation facilities with pedestrians and 24 types of PMD, 2) examine how perceptions of comfort are affected by the perceiver, device, and contextual variables, and 3) investigate the disparity between actual and perceived micromobility mode shares and speeds. We collected data using a quasi-intercept survey of path users at 12 locations in metropolitan Vancouver, Canada, which were matched with location-specific volumes and speeds classified by PMD type. Results indicate that, despite an overestimation of the prevalence and speed of new forms of PMD, people are predominantly comfortable sharing with most devices except sit-down electric (moped-style) scooters. Pedestrians are less comfortable sharing with electric devices than are people using other PMDs. Model results show that motorized PMD would have to go 9 km/hr slower than the equivalent non-motorized device to have the same impact on comfort. Recommendations include modernizing PMD regulations, working to eliminate the use of sit-down electric scooters on off-street facilities, lowering thresholds for separating pedestrians on multi-use paths, and continued monitoring of speed and comfort impacts from evolving PMD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the safety effect of traffic guidance sign alignment at expressway hybrid toll plazas Biosignal-based attention monitoring for evaluating train driver safety-relevant tasks Evaluating the effects of brake light flicker frequency on cognitive conspicuity during visual dark adaptation: A 360-degree simulated driving study To lose or not to lose one’s grip? A comparison of psychosocial predictors of risk-taking and accident involvement among French cyclists Factors influencing car owners’ intentions of using shared cars: An extension of the theory of planned behavior in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1