Validation of motorized two-wheeler virtual environment: Influence of perceived realism and simulator fidelity

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.001
Monik Gupta, Nagendra R. Velaga
{"title":"Validation of motorized two-wheeler virtual environment: Influence of perceived realism and simulator fidelity","authors":"Monik Gupta,&nbsp;Nagendra R. Velaga","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study explored the behavioral validity and contributing factors to improve realism in the virtual environment. The driving performance of motorized two-wheelers was compared in a simulator environment and real-world conditions. The driving simulator featured a virtual environment created with Unity 3D software, designed to replicate the real-world road infrastructure and traffic conditions to simulate a mixed-traffic environment. The driving performance measures, including mean speed, lateral acceleration, and longitudinal acceleration, were used to evaluate the behavioral validity. The control factors considered for determining the relative validity were a) Road Geometry and b) Distraction due to pillion rider. The Bayes hypothesis testing was conducted to compare the differences in performance measures in a) high fidelity driving simulator with motion base platform, b) driving simulator without motion base platform, and c) actual field conditions. The results supported the relative validity of the driving simulator in both with and without motion-based platforms. This study further quantified the difference in driving performance using explanatory variables: a) Perceived realism, b) Prior exposure to the virtual environment, and c) Individual characteristics. The results showed that the hypothesis proposing consistent relative standard performance parameters between the riding simulator and real-world distracted riding situations was three times more likely to be true. The motion feedback systems marginally improved the speed perception by reducing mean speed by 7.4 km/h. However, other factors, such as the realism of sound and surrounding traffic, reduced the mean speed in the simulator by 16.3 km/h and 28.6 km/h, respectively. This study also indicated that extended familiarization sessions beyond the hardware control and dwelling into speed perception improved the realistic speed in the virtual environment by 11.47 km/h. Overall, this study achieves a relative behavioral validity of the motorized two-wheeler simulator and highlights the critical aspects to consider while designing the experiments in the virtual environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 672-688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study explored the behavioral validity and contributing factors to improve realism in the virtual environment. The driving performance of motorized two-wheelers was compared in a simulator environment and real-world conditions. The driving simulator featured a virtual environment created with Unity 3D software, designed to replicate the real-world road infrastructure and traffic conditions to simulate a mixed-traffic environment. The driving performance measures, including mean speed, lateral acceleration, and longitudinal acceleration, were used to evaluate the behavioral validity. The control factors considered for determining the relative validity were a) Road Geometry and b) Distraction due to pillion rider. The Bayes hypothesis testing was conducted to compare the differences in performance measures in a) high fidelity driving simulator with motion base platform, b) driving simulator without motion base platform, and c) actual field conditions. The results supported the relative validity of the driving simulator in both with and without motion-based platforms. This study further quantified the difference in driving performance using explanatory variables: a) Perceived realism, b) Prior exposure to the virtual environment, and c) Individual characteristics. The results showed that the hypothesis proposing consistent relative standard performance parameters between the riding simulator and real-world distracted riding situations was three times more likely to be true. The motion feedback systems marginally improved the speed perception by reducing mean speed by 7.4 km/h. However, other factors, such as the realism of sound and surrounding traffic, reduced the mean speed in the simulator by 16.3 km/h and 28.6 km/h, respectively. This study also indicated that extended familiarization sessions beyond the hardware control and dwelling into speed perception improved the realistic speed in the virtual environment by 11.47 km/h. Overall, this study achieves a relative behavioral validity of the motorized two-wheeler simulator and highlights the critical aspects to consider while designing the experiments in the virtual environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the safety effect of traffic guidance sign alignment at expressway hybrid toll plazas Biosignal-based attention monitoring for evaluating train driver safety-relevant tasks Evaluating the effects of brake light flicker frequency on cognitive conspicuity during visual dark adaptation: A 360-degree simulated driving study To lose or not to lose one’s grip? A comparison of psychosocial predictors of risk-taking and accident involvement among French cyclists Factors influencing car owners’ intentions of using shared cars: An extension of the theory of planned behavior in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1