A hybrid exploratory approach for understanding risk driving behaviors of bus drivers: A case study of Nanjing, China

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.030
Hua Liu , Tiezhu Li , Jun Yang , Haibo Chen
{"title":"A hybrid exploratory approach for understanding risk driving behaviors of bus drivers: A case study of Nanjing, China","authors":"Hua Liu ,&nbsp;Tiezhu Li ,&nbsp;Jun Yang ,&nbsp;Haibo Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Risk driving behaviors among bus drivers raise growing concerns for public transportation operations, and identifying key influential factors can improve this situation. Based on 117,859 actual operation records from No. 851 bus line in Nanjing, causal relationships between five types of risk driving behaviors and influence factors were investigated by a framework of binary logit models to capture unobserved group and individual heterogeneities. Then, a random forest based SHAP model was utilized to provide further insights into potential inconsistencies. The empirical findings demonstrate that the performance of fixed effect binary logit models is consistent with that of random forest, as well as between the random effect and random parameter binary logit models. Besides, high correlations between land departure, vehicle proximity, and forward collision are observed. Further, travelling speed is identified as the predominant risk indicator, with lower speed being the determinant for distraction driving. Interestingly, the probability of forward collision increases beyond the distance of 50 m from bus bay entrances, and fatigue driving is more prone to occur at the locations less than 50 m from bus bay exits. Specifically, fatigue driving is mainly attributed to temporal and road environment characteristics, and distraction driving is more likely to happen on the single-lane roads with sharp acceleration and deceleration. Moreover, correlations between unobserved heterogeneities and some intervention measures for specific risk driving behaviors are quantified and proposed. Current findings could provide empirical evidence for implementing road safety measures and strategies in public transportation, and serve as supporting evidence for designing safety training programs for bus drivers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 520-539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003711","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk driving behaviors among bus drivers raise growing concerns for public transportation operations, and identifying key influential factors can improve this situation. Based on 117,859 actual operation records from No. 851 bus line in Nanjing, causal relationships between five types of risk driving behaviors and influence factors were investigated by a framework of binary logit models to capture unobserved group and individual heterogeneities. Then, a random forest based SHAP model was utilized to provide further insights into potential inconsistencies. The empirical findings demonstrate that the performance of fixed effect binary logit models is consistent with that of random forest, as well as between the random effect and random parameter binary logit models. Besides, high correlations between land departure, vehicle proximity, and forward collision are observed. Further, travelling speed is identified as the predominant risk indicator, with lower speed being the determinant for distraction driving. Interestingly, the probability of forward collision increases beyond the distance of 50 m from bus bay entrances, and fatigue driving is more prone to occur at the locations less than 50 m from bus bay exits. Specifically, fatigue driving is mainly attributed to temporal and road environment characteristics, and distraction driving is more likely to happen on the single-lane roads with sharp acceleration and deceleration. Moreover, correlations between unobserved heterogeneities and some intervention measures for specific risk driving behaviors are quantified and proposed. Current findings could provide empirical evidence for implementing road safety measures and strategies in public transportation, and serve as supporting evidence for designing safety training programs for bus drivers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公交司机风险驾驶行为理解的混合探索方法——以南京市为例
公交司机的危险驾驶行为引起了人们对公共交通运营的日益关注,识别关键的影响因素可以改善这种情况。基于南京市851路公交车117,859条实际运行记录,采用二元logit模型框架,研究了五种风险驾驶行为与影响因素之间的因果关系,以捕捉未观察到的群体和个体异质性。然后,利用基于随机森林的SHAP模型进一步了解潜在的不一致性。实证结果表明,固定效应二元logit模型的性能与随机森林模型的性能一致,随机效应与随机参数二元logit模型的性能也一致。此外,陆地偏离、车辆接近和前方碰撞之间存在高度相关性。此外,行车速度被确定为主要风险指标,较低的车速是分心驾驶的决定因素。有趣的是,在距离公交出入口50 m以外,前向碰撞的概率增加,而在距离公交出入口50 m以内的位置,疲劳驾驶更容易发生。疲劳驾驶主要受时间和道路环境特征的影响,在加速和减速剧烈的单车道道路上更容易发生分心驾驶。此外,未观察到的异质性与某些特定风险驾驶行为的干预措施之间的相关性被量化并提出。本研究结果可为公共交通道路安全措施和策略的实施提供实证依据,并可为公交司机安全培训方案的设计提供支持依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploiting the benevolent machine: Psychological antecedents of human drivers' strategic exploitation intentions toward autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic Integrated training to improve young novice drivers' hazard management and speed management skills: a driving simulator study Motorcycle safety in Vietnam: Revising and expanding the MRBQ to reflect emerging urban risks Effects of Visual Field Loss on Drivers' Explicit and Implicit Initial Trust Preferences: Full Driving Automation versus Themselves Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1