Towards recognizing cognitive distraction levels with low-cost and high-sensitive measures: The effectiveness of sample, approximate, and traditional steering entropies

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.036
Naixin Chang , Chunjiao Dong , Shufen Zhu , Penghui Li , Xiaomeng Li , Lihong Xia , Xuedong Yan
{"title":"Towards recognizing cognitive distraction levels with low-cost and high-sensitive measures: The effectiveness of sample, approximate, and traditional steering entropies","authors":"Naixin Chang ,&nbsp;Chunjiao Dong ,&nbsp;Shufen Zhu ,&nbsp;Penghui Li ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Li ,&nbsp;Lihong Xia ,&nbsp;Xuedong Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Driver distraction is one of the main factors leading to traffic accidents. Due to a lack of sensitive and accessible measures, the detection of cognitive distraction levels remains challenging and resource-intensive. Based on the idea that cognitive distraction causes unpredictable steering wheel operation, we introduced approximate entropy and sample entropy to quantify the unpredictability of drivers’ steering behavior during lane keeping. In this way, two novel steering measures, i.e., approximate steering entropy (ApproSE) and sample steering entropy (SampleSE), were proposed. To explore the effectiveness of the proposed measures, a driving simulator study with 35 participants was conducted, where four levels of cognitively demanding tasks induced by verbal recall of digits were involved. The effects of cognitive distraction level on various driving performance measures along with the two proposed measures were investigated, including the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), steering wheel reversal rate of 0.5° (SRR0.5°), the traditional steering entropy (TradSE), etc. Subsequently, the sensitivities of the three steering entropies (i.e., ApproSE, SampleSE, TradSE) changing with increased cognitive distraction levels were compared using statistical significance, effect size, and true positive rate. Moreover, various intervals for steering wheel angle sampling while calculating entropies were compared. The results showed that cognitive distraction led to increased ApproSE and SampleSE, as well as increased TradSE, SRR0.5°and decreased SDLP significantly. Particularly, ApproSE and SampleSE were observed with higher effect size than the other driving performance measures, which suggests that ApproSE and SampleSE are more sensitive to changes in cognitive distraction level. Among the three steering entropy measures, ApproSE and SampleSE were observed with higher robustness in various sample intervals, and higher consistency across the population than TradSE. The most suggested interval for steering wheel angle sampling while calculating ApproSE and SampleSE was 200 ms. The proposed novel steering entropies along with the other existing driving performance measures could be used to develop low-cost and highly sensitive driver cognitive distraction monitoring systems in intelligent vehicles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 1063-1079"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driver distraction is one of the main factors leading to traffic accidents. Due to a lack of sensitive and accessible measures, the detection of cognitive distraction levels remains challenging and resource-intensive. Based on the idea that cognitive distraction causes unpredictable steering wheel operation, we introduced approximate entropy and sample entropy to quantify the unpredictability of drivers’ steering behavior during lane keeping. In this way, two novel steering measures, i.e., approximate steering entropy (ApproSE) and sample steering entropy (SampleSE), were proposed. To explore the effectiveness of the proposed measures, a driving simulator study with 35 participants was conducted, where four levels of cognitively demanding tasks induced by verbal recall of digits were involved. The effects of cognitive distraction level on various driving performance measures along with the two proposed measures were investigated, including the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), steering wheel reversal rate of 0.5° (SRR0.5°), the traditional steering entropy (TradSE), etc. Subsequently, the sensitivities of the three steering entropies (i.e., ApproSE, SampleSE, TradSE) changing with increased cognitive distraction levels were compared using statistical significance, effect size, and true positive rate. Moreover, various intervals for steering wheel angle sampling while calculating entropies were compared. The results showed that cognitive distraction led to increased ApproSE and SampleSE, as well as increased TradSE, SRR0.5°and decreased SDLP significantly. Particularly, ApproSE and SampleSE were observed with higher effect size than the other driving performance measures, which suggests that ApproSE and SampleSE are more sensitive to changes in cognitive distraction level. Among the three steering entropy measures, ApproSE and SampleSE were observed with higher robustness in various sample intervals, and higher consistency across the population than TradSE. The most suggested interval for steering wheel angle sampling while calculating ApproSE and SampleSE was 200 ms. The proposed novel steering entropies along with the other existing driving performance measures could be used to develop low-cost and highly sensitive driver cognitive distraction monitoring systems in intelligent vehicles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用低成本和高灵敏度的方法识别认知分心水平:样本、近似和传统转向熵的有效性
司机注意力不集中是导致交通事故的主要因素之一。由于缺乏敏感和可获得的措施,认知分心水平的检测仍然具有挑战性和资源密集型。基于认知分心导致方向盘操作不可预测性的思想,引入近似熵和样本熵来量化车道保持过程中驾驶员转向行为的不可预测性。在此基础上,提出了近似转向熵(ApproSE)和样本转向熵(SampleSE)两种新的转向测度。为了探索这些方法的有效性,我们对35名参与者进行了驾驶模拟器研究,其中涉及四个级别的由数字的言语回忆引起的认知要求任务。研究了认知分心水平对横向位置标准差(SDLP)、方向盘0.5°倒转率(SRR0.5°)、传统转向熵(TradSE)等驾驶性能指标的影响。随后,使用统计学显著性、效应大小和真阳性率比较三个导向熵(即ApproSE、SampleSE、TradSE)随认知分心水平增加而变化的敏感性。并对计算熵时方向盘角度采样的不同间隔进行了比较。结果表明,认知分心导致受试者的ApproSE和SampleSE显著升高,TradSE和SRR0.5°显著升高,SDLP显著降低。特别是,与其他驾驶性能指标相比,ApproSE和SampleSE具有更高的效应量,这表明ApproSE和SampleSE对认知分心水平的变化更为敏感。在三个转向熵度量中,ApproSE和SampleSE在不同的样本区间具有更高的稳健性,并且在总体上的一致性比TradSE更高。在计算ApproSE和SampleSE时,最建议的方向盘角度采样间隔为200毫秒。所提出的新的转向熵和其他现有的驾驶性能指标可以用于开发低成本和高灵敏度的智能车辆驾驶员认知分心监测系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploiting the benevolent machine: Psychological antecedents of human drivers' strategic exploitation intentions toward autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic Integrated training to improve young novice drivers' hazard management and speed management skills: a driving simulator study Motorcycle safety in Vietnam: Revising and expanding the MRBQ to reflect emerging urban risks Effects of Visual Field Loss on Drivers' Explicit and Implicit Initial Trust Preferences: Full Driving Automation versus Themselves Walking school buses and their success (or failure) determinants: A thematic analysis of parental active school travel insights in Ferrara through the lens of social capital theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1