Integrating behavioral theory and ANNs for understanding electric bikers’ red-light running behavior

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.027
Tianpei Tang , Meining Yuan , Nan Zhang , Hua Wang , Yuntao Guo , Quan Shi
{"title":"Integrating behavioral theory and ANNs for understanding electric bikers’ red-light running behavior","authors":"Tianpei Tang ,&nbsp;Meining Yuan ,&nbsp;Nan Zhang ,&nbsp;Hua Wang ,&nbsp;Yuntao Guo ,&nbsp;Quan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding red-light running (RLR) behavior among electric bikers (e-bikers) is critical for addressing the high accident rates associated with this behavior. Traditional analytical methods, such as econometric modeling, often fail to capture the non-linear dynamics of traffic violations, limiting their effectiveness in exploring the complexity of such behaviors. Conversely, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) excel in handling non-linear relationships but lack interpretability, making their application in decision-making challenging. This study introduces an innovative six-step analytical framework that integrates hybrid ANNs with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). This integration utilizes a network weight-based approach to quantify the impacts of influencing factors within the ANNs. The results demonstrate that this hybrid framework not only enhances predictive accuracy but also provides a deeper understanding of the motivational drivers behind e-bikers’ RLR behavior. The study identifies significant behavioral heterogeneities across e-biker groups, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Based on these findings, a multi-faceted intervention strategy is proposed, combining educational campaigns, regulatory measures, and community engagement efforts tailored to distinct behavioral profiles. This research provides a robust foundation for developing safety improvement programs that aim to reduce e-biker accidents and improve overall road safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 1049-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding red-light running (RLR) behavior among electric bikers (e-bikers) is critical for addressing the high accident rates associated with this behavior. Traditional analytical methods, such as econometric modeling, often fail to capture the non-linear dynamics of traffic violations, limiting their effectiveness in exploring the complexity of such behaviors. Conversely, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) excel in handling non-linear relationships but lack interpretability, making their application in decision-making challenging. This study introduces an innovative six-step analytical framework that integrates hybrid ANNs with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). This integration utilizes a network weight-based approach to quantify the impacts of influencing factors within the ANNs. The results demonstrate that this hybrid framework not only enhances predictive accuracy but also provides a deeper understanding of the motivational drivers behind e-bikers’ RLR behavior. The study identifies significant behavioral heterogeneities across e-biker groups, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Based on these findings, a multi-faceted intervention strategy is proposed, combining educational campaigns, regulatory measures, and community engagement efforts tailored to distinct behavioral profiles. This research provides a robust foundation for developing safety improvement programs that aim to reduce e-biker accidents and improve overall road safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合行为理论与人工神经网络理解电动自行车闯红灯行为
了解电动自行车(e-bikers)中的闯红灯行为对于解决与此行为相关的高事故率至关重要。传统的分析方法,如计量经济模型,往往无法捕捉到交通违规的非线性动态,限制了它们在探索此类行为复杂性方面的有效性。相反,人工神经网络(ann)擅长处理非线性关系,但缺乏可解释性,使其在决策中的应用具有挑战性。本研究提出了一个创新的六步分析框架,将混合人工神经网络与计划行为理论(TPB)相结合。这种集成利用基于网络权重的方法来量化人工神经网络中影响因素的影响。结果表明,这种混合框架不仅提高了预测的准确性,而且更深入地了解了电动自行车骑行者RLR行为背后的动机驱动因素。该研究确定了电动自行车骑行者群体之间显著的行为异质性,强调了有针对性干预的必要性。基于这些发现,提出了一种多方面的干预策略,结合教育活动、监管措施和针对不同行为特征的社区参与努力。这项研究为制定旨在减少电动自行车事故和提高整体道路安全的安全改进计划提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment Who's in charge: Drivers or voice assistants? How power dynamics shape emotions and takeover behavior in automated driving Predictive role of empathic attention bias on driver traffic violations and the empathy-enhancing effects of intelligent driving companionship Active school travel and spatial cognition: exploring associations and moderating roles among children Why aren't electric vehicles taking over? Exploring the drivers and barriers to adoption: a systematic review, theoretical framework, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1