Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Non-Obese Caucasian and African American Populations Who Have Diabetes, A Nation-Wide Study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.009
Sindhu Kishore M.D., Leonid Khokhlov M.D., Sila Mateo Faxas MD., Mehwish Kishore M.D., Kamal Shemisa M.D.
{"title":"Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Non-Obese Caucasian and African American Populations Who Have Diabetes, A Nation-Wide Study","authors":"Sindhu Kishore M.D.,&nbsp;Leonid Khokhlov M.D.,&nbsp;Sila Mateo Faxas MD.,&nbsp;Mehwish Kishore M.D.,&nbsp;Kamal Shemisa M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>DM is a metabolic disease that is closely linked with ethnicity. There is limited data on its outcomes in different racial groups. Controlling DM will mitigate the risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to compare differences in clinical outcomes in non-obese Caucasian and African American (AA) populations with DM. Conducted as an observational study, it utilized data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2017 to 2020 focusing on non-obese adults over 18 years, with a BMI &lt;30 kg/m^2, and DM diagnosis, excluding those under 18, obese or without DM. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, GIB, mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and total cost. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression analyses determined the clinical outcomes, considering a p-value &lt;0.05 significant. Among 22,300,000 non-obese adults with DM, 64.2% were Caucasians, 18.8% were AA, 13.3% were Hispanics, 3.5% were Asians, and the remaining population belonged to other ethnicities. This study revealed higher rates in the Caucasians for conditions like metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, HTN, A.fib, PVD, ACS, severe sepsis, and COPD. The AA were seen to have a higher incidence of anemia, DKA, pHTN, HF, AKI, CKD, stroke, and PE. In terms of the primary outcome, Caucasians had more in-hospital mortality than the AA, but the results were not statistically significant. Results for the secondary outcomes were variable as seen in Table 1. The findings undermine the importance of racial differences in such conditions and more in-depth studies are needed to extrapolate the gaps in care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"278 ","pages":"Page 1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DM is a metabolic disease that is closely linked with ethnicity. There is limited data on its outcomes in different racial groups. Controlling DM will mitigate the risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to compare differences in clinical outcomes in non-obese Caucasian and African American (AA) populations with DM. Conducted as an observational study, it utilized data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2017 to 2020 focusing on non-obese adults over 18 years, with a BMI <30 kg/m^2, and DM diagnosis, excluding those under 18, obese or without DM. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, GIB, mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and total cost. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression analyses determined the clinical outcomes, considering a p-value <0.05 significant. Among 22,300,000 non-obese adults with DM, 64.2% were Caucasians, 18.8% were AA, 13.3% were Hispanics, 3.5% were Asians, and the remaining population belonged to other ethnicities. This study revealed higher rates in the Caucasians for conditions like metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, HTN, A.fib, PVD, ACS, severe sepsis, and COPD. The AA were seen to have a higher incidence of anemia, DKA, pHTN, HF, AKI, CKD, stroke, and PE. In terms of the primary outcome, Caucasians had more in-hospital mortality than the AA, but the results were not statistically significant. Results for the secondary outcomes were variable as seen in Table 1. The findings undermine the importance of racial differences in such conditions and more in-depth studies are needed to extrapolate the gaps in care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Information for Readers Occult cancer in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: Rationale, design, and methods of the ValRIETEs study and the SOME-RIETE trial. Design, rationale, and characterization of the Mobile health based OccuPational cardiovascular risk intErventioN study (mHealth-OPEN Study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1