Post Covid-19 Upturn in Acute MI Related Mortality Trends in Young to Middle Aged Type-2 Diabetics: Observations from CDC Wonder

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.024
Shaaf Ahmad
{"title":"Post Covid-19 Upturn in Acute MI Related Mortality Trends in Young to Middle Aged Type-2 Diabetics: Observations from CDC Wonder","authors":"Shaaf Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>COVID-19 outbreak negatively impacted all aspects of adequate delivery of healthcare by overburdening the modalities. Care for acute myocardial infarction was heavily impacted attributable, in part, to reduced hospitalizations and cardiac care units not being able to function at full capacity. This paper attempts to elicit the resultant trend shift in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related mortality in young to middle-aged diabetics.</div><div>CDC WONDER database was queried from 1999-2021. Only patients younger than 54 years old were included. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 with 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Joinpoint 5.0 software was used to analyze trend shift with average annual percent change (AAPC) values.</div><div>A total of 10,011 AMI related deaths were encountered in the young/middle aged diabetics during our study period. Of which, around 14% (1,381) deaths were recorded in the years 2020 &amp; 2021 alone. In these 2 years, 20.24% of subjects passed away in their homes vs only 11.06% deaths recorded in-patient. Overall AAMR more than doubled from 1999 (AAMR: 0.14 [0.13,0.16]) to 2021 (AAMR: 0.32 [0.3,0.34]) (AAPC: 3.7 [2.9,5.5]). Males had higher mortality rates (AAMR1999-2020: 2.55 [2.52,2.57]) than females (AAMR1999-2020: 1.49 [1.47-1.50]). Rural counties (AAMR1999-2020: 3.68 [3.63,3.74]) had nearly triple the mortality rates of large metropolitans (AAMR1999-2020: 1.70 [1.68,1.72]). AAMR were highest in the Midwest (AAMR1999-2020:2.3 [2.27,2.32]) and lowest in the Northeast (AAMR1999-2020: 1.41 [1.39,1.43]).</div><div>COVID-19 had profound effects on cardiovascular healthcare. Post-pandemic, developing robust mechanisms to reverse the damage dealt in terms of increased morbidity and mortality has become imperative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"278 ","pages":"Page 9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 outbreak negatively impacted all aspects of adequate delivery of healthcare by overburdening the modalities. Care for acute myocardial infarction was heavily impacted attributable, in part, to reduced hospitalizations and cardiac care units not being able to function at full capacity. This paper attempts to elicit the resultant trend shift in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related mortality in young to middle-aged diabetics.
CDC WONDER database was queried from 1999-2021. Only patients younger than 54 years old were included. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 with 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Joinpoint 5.0 software was used to analyze trend shift with average annual percent change (AAPC) values.
A total of 10,011 AMI related deaths were encountered in the young/middle aged diabetics during our study period. Of which, around 14% (1,381) deaths were recorded in the years 2020 & 2021 alone. In these 2 years, 20.24% of subjects passed away in their homes vs only 11.06% deaths recorded in-patient. Overall AAMR more than doubled from 1999 (AAMR: 0.14 [0.13,0.16]) to 2021 (AAMR: 0.32 [0.3,0.34]) (AAPC: 3.7 [2.9,5.5]). Males had higher mortality rates (AAMR1999-2020: 2.55 [2.52,2.57]) than females (AAMR1999-2020: 1.49 [1.47-1.50]). Rural counties (AAMR1999-2020: 3.68 [3.63,3.74]) had nearly triple the mortality rates of large metropolitans (AAMR1999-2020: 1.70 [1.68,1.72]). AAMR were highest in the Midwest (AAMR1999-2020:2.3 [2.27,2.32]) and lowest in the Northeast (AAMR1999-2020: 1.41 [1.39,1.43]).
COVID-19 had profound effects on cardiovascular healthcare. Post-pandemic, developing robust mechanisms to reverse the damage dealt in terms of increased morbidity and mortality has become imperative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19后青年至中年2型糖尿病患者急性心肌梗死相关死亡率趋势上升:来自CDC Wonder的观察
2019冠状病毒病疫情使医疗模式负担过重,对充分提供医疗服务的各个方面都产生了负面影响。急性心肌梗死的护理受到严重影响,部分原因是住院人数减少,心脏护理单位无法满负荷运转。本文试图引出青年到中年糖尿病患者急性心肌梗死(AMI)相关死亡率的趋势转变。查询1999-2021年CDC WONDER数据库。仅包括年龄小于54岁的患者。获得了每10万人的年龄调整死亡率(AAMR),置信区间为95%。采用Joinpoint 5.0软件分析趋势变化与年均变化百分比(AAPC)值的关系。在我们的研究期间,共有10011例中青年糖尿病患者与AMI相关的死亡。其中,约14%(1381人)的死亡记录发生在2020年。2021年孤独。在这两年中,20.24%的受试者在家中去世,而住院患者的死亡率仅为11.06%。总体AAMR从1999年(AAMR: 0.14[0.13,0.16])到2021年(AAMR: 0.32 [0.3,0.34]) (AAPC: 3.7[2.9,5.5])增加了一倍以上。男性死亡率(AAMR1999-2020: 2.55[2.52,2.57])高于女性(AAMR1999-2020: 1.49[1.47-1.50])。农村县(AAMR1999-2020: 3.68[3.63,3.74])的死亡率几乎是大城市(AAMR1999-2020: 1.70[1.68,1.72])的三倍。AAMR在中西部最高(AAMR1999-2020:2.3[2.27,2.32]),东北最低(AAMR1999-2020: 1.41[1.39,1.43])。COVID-19对心血管保健产生了深远影响。大流行后,必须建立强有力的机制,扭转发病率和死亡率增加所造成的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Design and rationale of a multicenter paramedic randomized trial of noradrenaline versus adrenaline in the initial management of patients with cardiogenic shock—The PANDA trial Integration of a task strengthening strategy for hypertension management into HIV care in Nigeria: Baseline characteristics of participants in a cluster randomized controlled trial Design and rationale of the COMPARE-TAVI 2 trial: An all-comers head-to-head comparison of Evolut FX+ and Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia transcatheter heart valves Remote dietitian counseling with short-term meal delivery improves DASH diet adherence and lowers blood pressure in veterans with hypertension and obesity Operator radiation exposure comparing left-radial artery and right-radial artery approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1