Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117687
Marcello Antonini , Mesfin G. Genie , Katie Attwell , Arthur E. Attema , Jeremy K. Ward , Alessia Melegaro , Aleksandra Torbica , Brian Kelly , Chiara Berardi , Ana Rita Sequeira , Neil McGregor , Adrian Kellner , Shuli Brammli-Greenberg , Madeleine Hinwood , Liubovė Murauskienė , Daiga Behmane , Zsolt J. Balogh , Terje P. Hagen , Francesco Paolucci
{"title":"Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries","authors":"Marcello Antonini ,&nbsp;Mesfin G. Genie ,&nbsp;Katie Attwell ,&nbsp;Arthur E. Attema ,&nbsp;Jeremy K. Ward ,&nbsp;Alessia Melegaro ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Torbica ,&nbsp;Brian Kelly ,&nbsp;Chiara Berardi ,&nbsp;Ana Rita Sequeira ,&nbsp;Neil McGregor ,&nbsp;Adrian Kellner ,&nbsp;Shuli Brammli-Greenberg ,&nbsp;Madeleine Hinwood ,&nbsp;Liubovė Murauskienė ,&nbsp;Daiga Behmane ,&nbsp;Zsolt J. Balogh ,&nbsp;Terje P. Hagen ,&nbsp;Francesco Paolucci","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In vaccination decisions, individuals must weigh the benefits against the risks of remaining unvaccinated and potentially facing social restrictions. Previous studies have focused on individual preferences for vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions separately. This study aims to quantify public preferences and the potential trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, in the context of a future pandemic. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 47,114 respondents from 21 countries between July 2022 and June 2023 through an online panel. Participants were presented with choices between two hypothetical vaccination programs and an option to opt-out. A latent class logit model was used to estimate trade-offs among attributes. Despite some level of preference heterogeneity across countries and respondents’ profiles, we consistently identified three classes of respondents: vaccine refusers, vaccine-hesitant, and pro-vaccine individuals. Vaccine attributes were generally deemed more important than societal restriction attributes. We detected strong preferences for the highest levels of vaccine effectiveness and for domestically produced vaccines across most countries. Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was the strongest predictor of pro-vaccine class preferences. Women and younger people were more likely to be vaccine refusers compared to men and older individuals. In some countries, vaccine hesitancy and refusal were linked to lower socioeconomic status, whereas in others, individuals with higher education and higher income were more likely to exhibit hesitancy. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored vaccination programs that consider local contexts and demographics. Building trust in national regulatory authorities and international organizations through targeted communication, along with investing in domestic production facilities, can improve vaccine uptake and enhance public health responses in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117687"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vaccination decisions, individuals must weigh the benefits against the risks of remaining unvaccinated and potentially facing social restrictions. Previous studies have focused on individual preferences for vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions separately. This study aims to quantify public preferences and the potential trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, in the context of a future pandemic. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 47,114 respondents from 21 countries between July 2022 and June 2023 through an online panel. Participants were presented with choices between two hypothetical vaccination programs and an option to opt-out. A latent class logit model was used to estimate trade-offs among attributes. Despite some level of preference heterogeneity across countries and respondents’ profiles, we consistently identified three classes of respondents: vaccine refusers, vaccine-hesitant, and pro-vaccine individuals. Vaccine attributes were generally deemed more important than societal restriction attributes. We detected strong preferences for the highest levels of vaccine effectiveness and for domestically produced vaccines across most countries. Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was the strongest predictor of pro-vaccine class preferences. Women and younger people were more likely to be vaccine refusers compared to men and older individuals. In some countries, vaccine hesitancy and refusal were linked to lower socioeconomic status, whereas in others, individuals with higher education and higher income were more likely to exhibit hesitancy. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored vaccination programs that consider local contexts and demographics. Building trust in national regulatory authorities and international organizations through targeted communication, along with investing in domestic production facilities, can improve vaccine uptake and enhance public health responses in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们为下一次大流行做好准备了吗?21个国家的公众偏好和疫苗特性与社会限制之间的权衡
在作出疫苗接种决定时,个人必须权衡其收益与不接种疫苗和可能面临社会限制的风险。以前的研究分别关注个人对疫苗特性的偏好和社会限制。本研究旨在量化未来大流行背景下公众偏好和疫苗特性与社会限制(包括封锁和疫苗授权)之间的潜在权衡。我们在2022年7月至2023年6月期间通过在线小组对来自21个国家的47,114名受访者进行了离散选择实验(DCE)。参与者可以在两个假设的疫苗接种计划之间做出选择,并可以选择退出。使用潜在类逻辑模型来估计属性之间的权衡。尽管不同国家和受访者的个人资料存在一定程度的偏好异质性,但我们一致确定了三类受访者:疫苗拒绝者、疫苗犹豫者和支持疫苗的个人。疫苗属性通常被认为比社会限制属性更重要。我们发现,大多数国家对最高水平的疫苗有效性和国内生产的疫苗有强烈的偏好。完全接种COVID-19疫苗是支持疫苗类别偏好的最强预测因子。与男性和老年人相比,女性和年轻人更有可能拒绝接种疫苗。在一些国家,疫苗犹豫和拒绝与较低的社会经济地位有关,而在另一些国家,受过高等教育和收入较高的个人更有可能表现出犹豫。我们的研究结果强调需要考虑当地情况和人口统计数据的量身定制的疫苗接种计划。通过有针对性的沟通,以及对国内生产设施的投资,建立对国家监管当局和国际组织的信任,可以改善疫苗的吸收,并加强未来的公共卫生反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Broadening the lens: a commentary on Sheard and Cauana-Finkel's account of women's progress in UK academic health economics' [Soc. Sci. Med. 382, October 2025, 118411]. Corrigendum to 'Association of socioeconomic inequality in cardiovascular disease risk with economic development across 57 low- and middle-income countries: Cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative individual-level data' [Soc. Sci. Med. 365, January 2025, 117591]. Family income trajectories and adverse outcomes in late adolescence: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Corrigendum to 'Sauna culture improves physical and mental wellbeing in the UK through social connection and ritual' [Soc. Sci. Med. 394, April 2026, 119061]. Between hospital and home: Hospital-adjacent neighborhood as a third therapeutic place for China's long-distance patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1