Maternal mortality ratios in low- and middle-income countries: a comparison of estimation methods and relationships with sociodemographic covariates

AJOG global reports Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100438
Biraj Sharma MBBS, MPH , Roger Smith MBBS, PhD , Binod Bindu Sharma PhD , Craig Pennell MBBS, PhD
{"title":"Maternal mortality ratios in low- and middle-income countries: a comparison of estimation methods and relationships with sociodemographic covariates","authors":"Biraj Sharma MBBS, MPH ,&nbsp;Roger Smith MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Binod Bindu Sharma PhD ,&nbsp;Craig Pennell MBBS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Maternal mortality is most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, especially those from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 aims to reduce global maternal mortality by 2030 to &lt;70 per 100,000 live births globally and &lt;140 per 100,000 live births at the national level. For maternal mortality ratio estimations, the World Health Organization recommends a census in low- and middle-income countries that lack civil registration and vital statistics; however, other methods have also been used.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to compare maternal mortality ratio estimating methods and maternal mortality ratio trends over time. Associations between sociodemographic variables in low- and middle-income countries and maternal mortality ratios are described and compared between countries projected to meet or fall short of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><div>Publications from the World Health Organization and the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group were used to identify countries that reported maternal mortality ratio estimates at least twice since 2004 using census, noncensus, or both approaches. Maternal mortality ratios were extracted from the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group, and covariates associated with maternal mortality ratios were obtained from the Our World in Data and the Fragile States Index web pages. Group comparisons were performed using paired <em>t</em> tests, and correlations between variations among maternal mortality ratio estimates and population demographic covariates were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. Projected maternal mortality ratio estimates for 2030 were calculated using the exponential growth/decay method used by the World Health Organization.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Data were available for 45 countries for comparison; 21 countries had data from different maternal mortality ratio estimation methods, and 42 countries reported maternal mortality ratios using the same estimation method over time. Census maternal mortality ratio estimates were 83.2 per 100,000 live births higher than the estimates from noncensus methods, although this difference was statistically nonsignificant (<em>P</em>=.19). Of the 45 countries assessed, 30.1% were projected to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 maternal mortality ratio target of &lt;140 per 100,000 births by 2030. National maternal mortality ratio estimates were significantly influenced by total fertility rate, skilled birth attendance rate, gross domestic product per capita, female and male literacy rates, female rate of access to modern contraceptives, and the Fragile States Index.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Maternal mortality ratio estimates are reproducible using different estimation methods in low- and middle-income countries. Only 30% of the low- and middle-income countries for which serial data are available are projected to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 3.1. Maternal mortality ratios are significantly lower in countries with sociodemographic characteristics that indicate a higher status for women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824001321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality is most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, especially those from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 aims to reduce global maternal mortality by 2030 to <70 per 100,000 live births globally and <140 per 100,000 live births at the national level. For maternal mortality ratio estimations, the World Health Organization recommends a census in low- and middle-income countries that lack civil registration and vital statistics; however, other methods have also been used.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare maternal mortality ratio estimating methods and maternal mortality ratio trends over time. Associations between sociodemographic variables in low- and middle-income countries and maternal mortality ratios are described and compared between countries projected to meet or fall short of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1.

STUDY DESIGN

Publications from the World Health Organization and the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group were used to identify countries that reported maternal mortality ratio estimates at least twice since 2004 using census, noncensus, or both approaches. Maternal mortality ratios were extracted from the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group, and covariates associated with maternal mortality ratios were obtained from the Our World in Data and the Fragile States Index web pages. Group comparisons were performed using paired t tests, and correlations between variations among maternal mortality ratio estimates and population demographic covariates were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. Projected maternal mortality ratio estimates for 2030 were calculated using the exponential growth/decay method used by the World Health Organization.

RESULTS

Data were available for 45 countries for comparison; 21 countries had data from different maternal mortality ratio estimation methods, and 42 countries reported maternal mortality ratios using the same estimation method over time. Census maternal mortality ratio estimates were 83.2 per 100,000 live births higher than the estimates from noncensus methods, although this difference was statistically nonsignificant (P=.19). Of the 45 countries assessed, 30.1% were projected to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 maternal mortality ratio target of <140 per 100,000 births by 2030. National maternal mortality ratio estimates were significantly influenced by total fertility rate, skilled birth attendance rate, gross domestic product per capita, female and male literacy rates, female rate of access to modern contraceptives, and the Fragile States Index.

CONCLUSION

Maternal mortality ratio estimates are reproducible using different estimation methods in low- and middle-income countries. Only 30% of the low- and middle-income countries for which serial data are available are projected to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 3.1. Maternal mortality ratios are significantly lower in countries with sociodemographic characteristics that indicate a higher status for women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入和中等收入国家的孕产妇死亡率:估计方法的比较及其与社会人口协变量的关系
背景产妇死亡率在低收入和中等收入国家最为普遍,尤其是撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚国家。可持续发展目标3.1旨在到2030年将全球孕产妇死亡率降至每10万活产70例,在国家一级降至每10万活产140例。关于估计孕产妇死亡率,世界卫生组织建议在缺乏民事登记和人口动态统计的低收入和中等收入国家进行人口普查;然而,其他方法也被使用。目的比较不同时期孕产妇死亡率的估算方法和趋势。描述了低收入和中等收入国家的社会人口变量与孕产妇死亡率之间的关联,并比较了预计将实现或未实现可持续发展目标3.1的国家之间的关联。研究设计:使用世界卫生组织和孕产妇死亡率估算机构间小组的出版物来确定自2004年以来使用人口普查、非人口普查或两种方法报告至少两次孕产妇死亡率估算的国家。孕产妇死亡率从孕产妇死亡率估算机构间小组中提取,与孕产妇死亡率相关的协变量从我们的世界数据和脆弱国家指数网页中获得。使用配对t检验进行组间比较,使用线性混合效应模型分析孕产妇死亡率估计值与人口统计学协变量之间的相关性。预计2030年孕产妇死亡率估计数是使用世界卫生组织使用的指数增长/衰减法计算的。结果有45个国家的数据可供比较;21个国家的数据来自不同的孕产妇死亡率估计方法,42个国家报告了不同时期的孕产妇死亡率,使用了相同的估计方法。人口普查估计的孕产妇死亡率为每10万活产83.2人,高于非人口普查方法的估计,尽管这种差异在统计学上不显著(P= 0.19)。在接受评估的45个国家中,预计30.1%的国家到2030年将实现可持续发展目标3.1的孕产妇死亡率目标,即每10万例分娩中有140例死亡。全国孕产妇死亡率估计数受到总生育率、熟练助产率、人均国内生产总值、男女识字率、女性获得现代避孕药具的比率以及脆弱国家指数的显著影响。结论在低收入和中等收入国家,使用不同的估计方法估计孕产妇死亡率具有可重复性。在可获得连续数据的低收入和中等收入国家中,预计只有30%能够实现可持续发展目标3.1。在具有表明妇女地位较高的社会人口特征的国家,产妇死亡率要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of blood pressure categorization using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in young women with presumed chronic hypertension with and without a history of pregnancy Agreement of intraoperative clinical grading by the FIGO criteria with antenatal ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum and correlation with clinical outcomes Caesarean section Robson classification, complications, and lessons learned in a rural hospital in Walikale, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study Safety of 48 months of elagolix with add-back therapy for endometriosis-associated pain Care strategies for pregnant people and women living with hepatitis C in North America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1