{"title":"The relationship between disease self-management and internalized stigmatization in individuals with epilepsy: A sample in eastern Turkey","authors":"Eda Ay , Emrah Ay , Nuray Bingol","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epilepsy is often misunderstood, leading to fear, stigmatization of patients and the risk of social discrimination. For some patients, social stigma can be an even bigger problem than epilepsy itself.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study examined the relationship between self-management and internalized stigma levels in individuals diagnosed with epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neurology Outpatient Clinic of a Training and Research Hospital and 128 epilepsy patients were included in the sample based on various inclusion criteria such as having a diagnosis of epilepsy for at least six months, being over the age of 18, not having any psychiatric disorder that would prevent reading and comprehension.The Sociodemographic Data Form, Internalized Stigma in Epilepsy Scale, and Epilepsy Self-Management Scale were used to collect the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age at disease onset was 19.5 ± 11.7 years. In terms of the demographics of the patients, 55.5 % were female, 46 % were aged 18–22 years, 53.9 % were single, 30 % were at least university graduates, 85.2 % had income equal to their expenses, 75.8 % had a seizure frequency of more than one per year, 58.6 % had generalized onset seizures, and 73.4 % used one drug. The patients’ Self-Management Scale total score was 111.01 ± 13.22, and their Internalized Stigma Scale total score was 49.9 ± 12.9. The correlation analysis indicated a high significant negative correlation between the Self-Management Scale total score and the Internalized Stigma Scale total score (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The patients’ self-management levels were above average, and their internalized stigma levels were moderate. The patients were most stigmatized in the areas of isolation and discrimination. Generally, as the self-management skills of patients increased, their internalized stigma levels decreased. In this context, it is recommended that intervention studies be conducted to increase the self-management levels and reduce stigma for individuals diagnosed with epilepsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124002122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Epilepsy is often misunderstood, leading to fear, stigmatization of patients and the risk of social discrimination. For some patients, social stigma can be an even bigger problem than epilepsy itself.
Aim
This study examined the relationship between self-management and internalized stigma levels in individuals diagnosed with epilepsy.
Methods
This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neurology Outpatient Clinic of a Training and Research Hospital and 128 epilepsy patients were included in the sample based on various inclusion criteria such as having a diagnosis of epilepsy for at least six months, being over the age of 18, not having any psychiatric disorder that would prevent reading and comprehension.The Sociodemographic Data Form, Internalized Stigma in Epilepsy Scale, and Epilepsy Self-Management Scale were used to collect the data.
Results
The mean age at disease onset was 19.5 ± 11.7 years. In terms of the demographics of the patients, 55.5 % were female, 46 % were aged 18–22 years, 53.9 % were single, 30 % were at least university graduates, 85.2 % had income equal to their expenses, 75.8 % had a seizure frequency of more than one per year, 58.6 % had generalized onset seizures, and 73.4 % used one drug. The patients’ Self-Management Scale total score was 111.01 ± 13.22, and their Internalized Stigma Scale total score was 49.9 ± 12.9. The correlation analysis indicated a high significant negative correlation between the Self-Management Scale total score and the Internalized Stigma Scale total score (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The patients’ self-management levels were above average, and their internalized stigma levels were moderate. The patients were most stigmatized in the areas of isolation and discrimination. Generally, as the self-management skills of patients increased, their internalized stigma levels decreased. In this context, it is recommended that intervention studies be conducted to increase the self-management levels and reduce stigma for individuals diagnosed with epilepsy.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.