Creative partnerships with generative AI. Possibilities for education and beyond

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101727
Edwin Creely, Jo Blannin
{"title":"Creative partnerships with generative AI. Possibilities for education and beyond","authors":"Edwin Creely,&nbsp;Jo Blannin","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on creative production in industry and education is just beginning to be experienced and understood. This impact is likely to accelerate and become even more significant as the computational potential of generative AI grows through training on more diverse and more extensive language models and data sets. Emerging research in this new field suggests that previous models of understanding the interactions between machine and human may no longer be sufficient in a world of generative AI. The significant question is how emerging generative AI technologies will relate to and be a part of human creativity and creative outputs. In this article, we adopt a posthuman stance and conceive of creative output involving generative AI and humans in terms of a yet-to-be-fully-realised and emergent relationship that will likely become more integrated and complex. To investigate and experiment with this relational notion, each of us (as part of an autoethnographic approach) developed a creative output using ChatGPT: a poem and a multimodal narrative. We then employed the idea of alterity relations from the American philosopher of technology, Don Ihde, to conceive of the possibilities and limitations in working relationally and productively with generative AI. As two academics working in teacher education, we applied our learning from this exploration to possibilities in educational contexts. In this article, we offer several important implications and provocations for practitioners, researchers, educators and policymakers, not only in terms of practical concerns but also for rethinking the nature of the creative output.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101727"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on creative production in industry and education is just beginning to be experienced and understood. This impact is likely to accelerate and become even more significant as the computational potential of generative AI grows through training on more diverse and more extensive language models and data sets. Emerging research in this new field suggests that previous models of understanding the interactions between machine and human may no longer be sufficient in a world of generative AI. The significant question is how emerging generative AI technologies will relate to and be a part of human creativity and creative outputs. In this article, we adopt a posthuman stance and conceive of creative output involving generative AI and humans in terms of a yet-to-be-fully-realised and emergent relationship that will likely become more integrated and complex. To investigate and experiment with this relational notion, each of us (as part of an autoethnographic approach) developed a creative output using ChatGPT: a poem and a multimodal narrative. We then employed the idea of alterity relations from the American philosopher of technology, Don Ihde, to conceive of the possibilities and limitations in working relationally and productively with generative AI. As two academics working in teacher education, we applied our learning from this exploration to possibilities in educational contexts. In this article, we offer several important implications and provocations for practitioners, researchers, educators and policymakers, not only in terms of practical concerns but also for rethinking the nature of the creative output.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与生成式人工智能的创造性伙伴关系。教育及其他领域的可能性
生成式人工智能(AI)对工业和教育创意生产的影响才刚刚开始被体验和理解。随着生成式人工智能的计算潜力通过更多样化、更广泛的语言模型和数据集的训练而增长,这种影响可能会加速并变得更加显著。这个新领域的新兴研究表明,以前理解机器和人类之间相互作用的模型可能不再足以适应生成式人工智能的世界。重要的问题是,新兴的生成式人工智能技术将如何与人类创造力和创造性产出联系起来,并成为其中的一部分。在这篇文章中,我们将采取后人类的立场,并从一种尚未完全实现的、可能变得更加整合和复杂的紧急关系的角度,设想涉及生成人工智能和人类的创造性产出。为了研究和实验这种关系概念,我们每个人(作为自我民族志方法的一部分)都使用ChatGPT开发了一种创造性的输出:一首诗和一种多模态叙事。然后,我们采用了美国技术哲学家唐·伊德(Don Ihde)提出的另类关系(alternative relations)的概念,来构想与生成式人工智能(generative AI)建立关系并富有成效地工作的可能性和局限性。作为两位从事教师教育的学者,我们将从这次探索中学习到的知识应用到教育领域的可能性中。在本文中,我们为实践者、研究人员、教育工作者和政策制定者提供了一些重要的启示和启发,不仅在实际问题方面,而且在重新思考创造性产出的性质方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Integrated STEM-based mathematical problem-solving skills of students: The role of prior mathematical knowledge and text comprehension skills Integrating unplugged computational thinking activities into elementary social studies education: A framework for pre-service teacher training Construction and practice of design-based learning model for cultivating creative thinking: A case study of STEM courses in junior high school Development and validation of a preformal test for mathematical proof competence An observational study on how teachers support students’ creativity: The role of subject, lesson type, and classroom climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1