Hands up, minds on! Learn & play landscapes: Systematic review

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101724
Fatemeh Boroumandi , Sara Daneshmand , Kaveh Fattahi
{"title":"Hands up, minds on! Learn & play landscapes: Systematic review","authors":"Fatemeh Boroumandi ,&nbsp;Sara Daneshmand ,&nbsp;Kaveh Fattahi","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Opportunities for play in public spaces are crucial for supporting children's health and development. Over the past decade, numerous studies have explored the intersection of play, learning, and the design of playful landscapes, highlighting the benefits of outdoor play and its connection to learning outcomes. Efforts have also focused on creating playful environments within urban settings tailored to children's educational needs. Despite these efforts, systematic research in this field remains limited. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive review of existing literature, addressing key questions such as What approaches have researchers employed in studying learn &amp; play landscapes, Who has conducted research on learn &amp; play landscapes, and what fields of study do they represent, Who was identified as the target audience in this research, How have researchers in learn &amp; play landscapes developed their studies, and what methods did they employ, Where did learn &amp; play landscapes research attract the most interest globally, and which land-uses were most frequently explored and emphasized in these studies and, When did research on playful, learning-oriented landscapes start to be explored, and during which periods did learn &amp; play landscapes receive the most attention. The answers to these five questions represent the novelty of our work in the learn &amp; play landscapes field.</div><div>This paper reports on the findings of a systematic review of 33 peer-reviewed empirical publications from 2005 to 2024. The findings reveal three key challenges for future work: (i) greater appreciation and engagement with experts from different fields; (ii) identifying more public places with the potential to become learn &amp; play landscapes; and (iii) using accurate measurement tools in neuro-architecture to better assess the effectiveness of learn &amp; play landscapes. The authors invite researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to work closely with children, engage with their diversity, and explore interdisciplinary and interprofessional avenues to promote equal opportunities for play across the built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101724"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opportunities for play in public spaces are crucial for supporting children's health and development. Over the past decade, numerous studies have explored the intersection of play, learning, and the design of playful landscapes, highlighting the benefits of outdoor play and its connection to learning outcomes. Efforts have also focused on creating playful environments within urban settings tailored to children's educational needs. Despite these efforts, systematic research in this field remains limited. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive review of existing literature, addressing key questions such as What approaches have researchers employed in studying learn & play landscapes, Who has conducted research on learn & play landscapes, and what fields of study do they represent, Who was identified as the target audience in this research, How have researchers in learn & play landscapes developed their studies, and what methods did they employ, Where did learn & play landscapes research attract the most interest globally, and which land-uses were most frequently explored and emphasized in these studies and, When did research on playful, learning-oriented landscapes start to be explored, and during which periods did learn & play landscapes receive the most attention. The answers to these five questions represent the novelty of our work in the learn & play landscapes field.
This paper reports on the findings of a systematic review of 33 peer-reviewed empirical publications from 2005 to 2024. The findings reveal three key challenges for future work: (i) greater appreciation and engagement with experts from different fields; (ii) identifying more public places with the potential to become learn & play landscapes; and (iii) using accurate measurement tools in neuro-architecture to better assess the effectiveness of learn & play landscapes. The authors invite researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to work closely with children, engage with their diversity, and explore interdisciplinary and interprofessional avenues to promote equal opportunities for play across the built environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
举起手来,注意!学习和体验景观:系统回顾
在公共场所玩耍的机会对于支持儿童的健康和发展至关重要。在过去的十年中,许多研究探索了游戏、学习和游戏景观设计的交集,强调了户外游戏的好处及其与学习成果的联系。努力还集中在城市环境中创造适合儿童教育需求的游戏环境。尽管做出了这些努力,但这一领域的系统研究仍然有限。本研究旨在通过对现有文献的全面回顾来填补这一空白,解决关键问题,如研究人员在研究学习中采用了什么方法?谁进行了研究学习& &;游戏景观,它们代表了哪些研究领域,谁被确定为本研究的目标受众,研究人员如何学习& &;游戏景观发展了他们的研究,他们采用了什么方法,他们在哪里学习?游戏景观研究在全球范围内最受关注,哪些土地用途在这些研究中最常被探索和强调,什么时候开始探索游戏、学习型景观的研究,在什么时期开始学习;游戏景观最受关注。这五个问题的答案代表了我们在学习中工作的新颖性。玩景观场。本文报告了对2005年至2024年33份同行评议的实证出版物进行系统综述的结果。调查结果揭示了未来工作面临的三个关键挑战:(i)更多地欣赏和参与来自不同领域的专家;(ii)确定更多有潜力成为学习场所的公共场所;发挥景观;(iii)在神经建筑学中使用精确的测量工具来更好地评估learn &;玩的风景。作者邀请研究人员、从业者和政策制定者与儿童密切合作,利用他们的多样性,探索跨学科和跨专业的途径,促进在整个建筑环境中玩耍的平等机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Integrated STEM-based mathematical problem-solving skills of students: The role of prior mathematical knowledge and text comprehension skills Integrating unplugged computational thinking activities into elementary social studies education: A framework for pre-service teacher training Construction and practice of design-based learning model for cultivating creative thinking: A case study of STEM courses in junior high school Development and validation of a preformal test for mathematical proof competence An observational study on how teachers support students’ creativity: The role of subject, lesson type, and classroom climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1