Cognitive foundations in the interplay between computational thinking and creativity: A scoping review

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101729
Jinhua Wang , Weipeng Yang , Michael K. Yeung
{"title":"Cognitive foundations in the interplay between computational thinking and creativity: A scoping review","authors":"Jinhua Wang ,&nbsp;Weipeng Yang ,&nbsp;Michael K. Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have explored the relationship between computational thinking (CT) and creativity. However, a consensus has yet to be reached since both CT and creativity varied in ideation and assessment. To uncover the cognitive mechanism underlying the interplay between CT and creativity, we conduct a scoping review of 26 empirical studies published in 2006–2024. Our findings suggested that the effects of working memory varied in the interplay between CT and creativity due to differences in age range, neural network activation regions, and measurements. Intellectual abilities, including algorithmic fluency, reasoning ability, and coding ability, showed cognitive transfer effect on CT skills but not necessarily on creativity, suggesting that cognitive abilities embracing more intelligent elements may contribute to the functional connectivity in CT neural networks but only partly overlapped with creativity involved networks. Although executive functions (working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control) play a crucial role in both CT and creativity, their contributions to the CT-creativity interplay are still rarely studied. Future research should explore the CT-creativity relationship from the perspective of neuroscience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have explored the relationship between computational thinking (CT) and creativity. However, a consensus has yet to be reached since both CT and creativity varied in ideation and assessment. To uncover the cognitive mechanism underlying the interplay between CT and creativity, we conduct a scoping review of 26 empirical studies published in 2006–2024. Our findings suggested that the effects of working memory varied in the interplay between CT and creativity due to differences in age range, neural network activation regions, and measurements. Intellectual abilities, including algorithmic fluency, reasoning ability, and coding ability, showed cognitive transfer effect on CT skills but not necessarily on creativity, suggesting that cognitive abilities embracing more intelligent elements may contribute to the functional connectivity in CT neural networks but only partly overlapped with creativity involved networks. Although executive functions (working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control) play a crucial role in both CT and creativity, their contributions to the CT-creativity interplay are still rarely studied. Future research should explore the CT-creativity relationship from the perspective of neuroscience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算思维与创造力相互作用中的认知基础:范围综述
以往的研究探讨了计算思维(CT)与创造力之间的关系。但是,由于CT和创造力在概念和评价上存在差异,因此尚未达成共识。为了揭示CT与创造力之间相互作用的认知机制,我们对2006-2024年发表的26项实证研究进行了范围审查。我们的研究结果表明,由于年龄范围、神经网络激活区域和测量的差异,工作记忆的影响在CT和创造力之间的相互作用中有所不同。包括算法流畅性、推理能力和编码能力在内的智力能力对CT技能表现出认知转移效应,但对创造力则不一定,这表明包含更多智能元素的认知能力可能有助于CT神经网络的功能连接,但与创造力相关的网络只是部分重叠。虽然执行功能(工作记忆、认知灵活性和抑制控制)在CT和创造力中都起着至关重要的作用,但它们对CT-创造力相互作用的贡献仍然很少被研究。未来的研究应从神经科学的角度探讨ct -创造力的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Integrated STEM-based mathematical problem-solving skills of students: The role of prior mathematical knowledge and text comprehension skills Integrating unplugged computational thinking activities into elementary social studies education: A framework for pre-service teacher training Construction and practice of design-based learning model for cultivating creative thinking: A case study of STEM courses in junior high school Development and validation of a preformal test for mathematical proof competence An observational study on how teachers support students’ creativity: The role of subject, lesson type, and classroom climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1