Supervisor negative feedback and subordinate creative behavior: The role of cognitive appraisal and regulatory focus

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101731
Zizhen Geng , Ziqiong Qiao , Jinjie Xue , Huili Tang , Xueting Sun
{"title":"Supervisor negative feedback and subordinate creative behavior: The role of cognitive appraisal and regulatory focus","authors":"Zizhen Geng ,&nbsp;Ziqiong Qiao ,&nbsp;Jinjie Xue ,&nbsp;Huili Tang ,&nbsp;Xueting Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature provides conflicting evidence regarding the effect of supervisor negative feedback on subordinate creativity. This study draws on a self-regulatory perspective to develop a theoretical model in which supervisor negative feedback provided in different ways initiates subordinates’ distinct cognitive appraisals of feedback stimuli and, thereby, triggers regulation of subordinates’ creative behavior, which is the behavioral manifestation of creativity. Furthermore, this study suggests that the subordinate's regulatory focus is a dispositional boundary condition that influences the effect of supervisor negative feedback on subordinate creative behavior. A scenario-based experimental study and time-lagged field study showed that (1) the supervisor's developmental negative feedback triggers both challenge appraisal and hindrance appraisal, while the supervisor's controlling negative feedback only induces hindrance appraisal; and (2) the supervisor's developmental negative feedback exerts an indirect positive effect on self-reported subordinate creative behavior via challenge appraisal, which is significantly strengthened by the subordinate's promotion focus, while the supervisor's controlling negative feedback exerts an indirect negative effect on supervisor-assessed subordinate creative behavior via hindrance appraisal. The results of this study add to the literature on the complex links between supervisor negative feedback and individual creativity by highlighting a process-based view of creativity and reconciling conflicting findings. This work clarifies the self-regulatory mechanism of individual creative behavior in response to supervisor negative feedback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101731"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature provides conflicting evidence regarding the effect of supervisor negative feedback on subordinate creativity. This study draws on a self-regulatory perspective to develop a theoretical model in which supervisor negative feedback provided in different ways initiates subordinates’ distinct cognitive appraisals of feedback stimuli and, thereby, triggers regulation of subordinates’ creative behavior, which is the behavioral manifestation of creativity. Furthermore, this study suggests that the subordinate's regulatory focus is a dispositional boundary condition that influences the effect of supervisor negative feedback on subordinate creative behavior. A scenario-based experimental study and time-lagged field study showed that (1) the supervisor's developmental negative feedback triggers both challenge appraisal and hindrance appraisal, while the supervisor's controlling negative feedback only induces hindrance appraisal; and (2) the supervisor's developmental negative feedback exerts an indirect positive effect on self-reported subordinate creative behavior via challenge appraisal, which is significantly strengthened by the subordinate's promotion focus, while the supervisor's controlling negative feedback exerts an indirect negative effect on supervisor-assessed subordinate creative behavior via hindrance appraisal. The results of this study add to the literature on the complex links between supervisor negative feedback and individual creativity by highlighting a process-based view of creativity and reconciling conflicting findings. This work clarifies the self-regulatory mechanism of individual creative behavior in response to supervisor negative feedback.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主管负反馈与下属创造性行为:认知评价与调节焦点的作用
关于主管负面反馈对下属创造力的影响,文献提供了相互矛盾的证据。本研究从自我调节的角度出发,建立了一个理论模型,在这个模型中,管理者以不同的方式提供的负反馈引发了下属对反馈刺激的不同认知评价,从而引发了对下属创造行为的调节,这是创造力的行为表现。此外,本研究表明,下属的监管焦点是影响主管负反馈对下属创新行为影响的一个性格边界条件。基于场景的实验研究和滞后的现场研究表明:(1)主管发展性负反馈触发挑战评价和障碍评价,而主管控制性负反馈仅诱发障碍评价;(2)主管发展性负反馈通过挑战评价对下属自我报告的创造行为产生间接的正向影响,而下属的晋升关注显著增强了这种正向影响,而主管控制性负反馈通过阻碍评价对主管评估的下属创造行为产生间接的负向影响。本研究的结果通过强调基于过程的创造力观点和调和相互矛盾的发现,增加了关于主管负面反馈与个人创造力之间复杂联系的文献。本研究阐明了个体创造性行为应对主管负反馈的自我调节机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Integrated STEM-based mathematical problem-solving skills of students: The role of prior mathematical knowledge and text comprehension skills Integrating unplugged computational thinking activities into elementary social studies education: A framework for pre-service teacher training Construction and practice of design-based learning model for cultivating creative thinking: A case study of STEM courses in junior high school Development and validation of a preformal test for mathematical proof competence An observational study on how teachers support students’ creativity: The role of subject, lesson type, and classroom climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1