Kevin S. Anderson;Joshua S. Stein;Marios Theristis
{"title":"Variation in Photovoltaic Energy Rating and Underlying Drivers Across Modules and Climates","authors":"Kevin S. Anderson;Joshua S. Stein;Marios Theristis","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3534678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of photovoltaic (PV) modules is determined by the interplay between their inherent characteristics and the prevailing weather conditions. Although the impacts of different characteristics (e.g., low-light behavior, spectral mismatch, temperature coefficient, etc) are known, they have not been quantified over large geographic regions. This study uses the Climate Specific Energy Rating (CSER) and specific yield metrics as criteria to determine how different PV modules perform across climates in the contiguous United States (CONUS) and identifies the underlying drivers behind the observed variations. The annual CSER and specific yield of various PV technologies vary by more than 10% and 30%, respectively, across the CONUS. As expected, temperature has the most significant impact on CSER, affecting CSER by up to 13.1%, while spectral effects account for up to 4.9% variation in the case of cadmium telluride modules. Additionally, minor differences in parameter estimation procedures are shown to result in CSER differences of up to 1.5% in some climates. Furthermore, the IEC 61853-4 reference climatic datasets are found to overestimate CSER by 2–4% relative to climatic data for locations of actual PV systems in the United States. A new set of reference locations that accurately represents CSER across CONUS is proposed as an alternative to the IEC 61853-4 reference datasets.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"21064-21073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10854476","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10854476/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The performance of photovoltaic (PV) modules is determined by the interplay between their inherent characteristics and the prevailing weather conditions. Although the impacts of different characteristics (e.g., low-light behavior, spectral mismatch, temperature coefficient, etc) are known, they have not been quantified over large geographic regions. This study uses the Climate Specific Energy Rating (CSER) and specific yield metrics as criteria to determine how different PV modules perform across climates in the contiguous United States (CONUS) and identifies the underlying drivers behind the observed variations. The annual CSER and specific yield of various PV technologies vary by more than 10% and 30%, respectively, across the CONUS. As expected, temperature has the most significant impact on CSER, affecting CSER by up to 13.1%, while spectral effects account for up to 4.9% variation in the case of cadmium telluride modules. Additionally, minor differences in parameter estimation procedures are shown to result in CSER differences of up to 1.5% in some climates. Furthermore, the IEC 61853-4 reference climatic datasets are found to overestimate CSER by 2–4% relative to climatic data for locations of actual PV systems in the United States. A new set of reference locations that accurately represents CSER across CONUS is proposed as an alternative to the IEC 61853-4 reference datasets.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.