{"title":"Consensus-Based Resilience Assurance for System of Systems","authors":"Huanjun Zhang;Yutaka Matsubara","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of a System of Systems makes resilience one of its key attributes. Numerous studies have focused on the quantitative assessment of resilience by trailing indicators, yet discussions on resilience assurance through monitoring leading indicators remain scarce. Resilience assurance in SoS faces two major challenges: lack of structured argumentation work related to resilience and conflicts among multiple independent stakeholders. To address these challenges, this paper first introduces a resilience argumentation approach based on STAMP (Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes), then employs cooperative consensus process model to seek consensus on resilience assurance. Additionally, under the requirements of the international standard IEC 62853 for open systems dependability, a consensus based resilience assurance framework is proposed. Within the framework, the resilient team can discuss the specific implementation details of failure response, accountability, and change accommodation based on stakeholder consensus. Finally, two SoS case studies, Microgrid and Mobility as a Service, are used to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"20203-20217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10855432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10855432/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The complexity of a System of Systems makes resilience one of its key attributes. Numerous studies have focused on the quantitative assessment of resilience by trailing indicators, yet discussions on resilience assurance through monitoring leading indicators remain scarce. Resilience assurance in SoS faces two major challenges: lack of structured argumentation work related to resilience and conflicts among multiple independent stakeholders. To address these challenges, this paper first introduces a resilience argumentation approach based on STAMP (Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes), then employs cooperative consensus process model to seek consensus on resilience assurance. Additionally, under the requirements of the international standard IEC 62853 for open systems dependability, a consensus based resilience assurance framework is proposed. Within the framework, the resilient team can discuss the specific implementation details of failure response, accountability, and change accommodation based on stakeholder consensus. Finally, two SoS case studies, Microgrid and Mobility as a Service, are used to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach.
系统之系统的复杂性使得弹性成为其关键属性之一。许多研究侧重于通过跟踪指标对弹性进行定量评估,但通过监测领先指标来保证弹性的讨论仍然很少。SoS弹性保障面临两个主要挑战:缺乏与弹性相关的结构化论证工作和多个独立利益相关者之间的冲突。针对这些挑战,本文首先引入了一种基于系统理论事故模型和过程(system - theory Accident Model and Processes)的弹性论证方法,然后采用协作共识过程模型寻求弹性保障的共识。此外,根据国际标准IEC 62853对开放系统可靠性的要求,提出了基于共识的弹性保证框架。在框架内,弹性团队可以讨论基于涉众共识的失败响应、问责制和变更适应的具体实现细节。最后,用两个SoS案例研究,微电网和移动即服务,来演示所提出方法的应用。
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.