Improving Crack Detection Precision of Concrete Structures Using U-Net Architecture and Novel DBCE Loss Function

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Access Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3534803
Andrew Prasetyo;I Ketut Eddy Purnama;Eko Mulyanto Yuniarno;Priyo Suprobo
{"title":"Improving Crack Detection Precision of Concrete Structures Using U-Net Architecture and Novel DBCE Loss Function","authors":"Andrew Prasetyo;I Ketut Eddy Purnama;Eko Mulyanto Yuniarno;Priyo Suprobo","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3534803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring the health of infrastructure is critical to maintaining the integrity of concrete construction. Conventional crack detection methods that rely on visual inspection and image processing often produce inconsistent results. U-Net, an architecture often used in image processing, has limitations in crack segmentation, especially regarding the loss function. The main challenge is class imbalance, as cracks usually occupy a much smaller area compared to the background in concrete images. To address this, we developed an automated technique utilizing the U-Net framework with a novel loss function that we named DBCE Loss. Unlike the typical BCED we added the LogCoshDice function to get an improvement so that the resulting loss will be better and can improve the performance of the model. The performance of our method is rigorously evaluated by combining DeepCrack, GAPS, Crack500, and CrackForest datasets to illustrate that the model can detect cracks in various material conditions. DeepCrack represents cracks in concrete with minimal distress, while GAPS represents cracks in asphalt. Crack500 covers cracks with significant distress such as gravel, and CrackForest focuses on small cracks in concrete.The proposed U-Net model achieved Maximum accuracies between 98.58% and 99.22%, Maximum Dice coefficients from 88.27% to 98.03%, and Maximum F1-scores up to 97.11%. The proposed method is 7.69% ahead of the largest comparison method (DICE Loss) on Average IOU, while on Average Precission is leading 6.72% ahead of the largest comparison method (DICE). Then in terms of Recall our method is 8.84% superior to the largest comparison method (BCE). Sera in terms of Average F1-Score is 14.64% ahead of the largest comparison method (DICE). These results show that our method has surpassed conventional loss methods such as BCE, DICE and BCED. This research can facilitate a more reliable infrastructure health monitoring process and help with crack detection in the future.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"20903-20922"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10855421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10855421/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring the health of infrastructure is critical to maintaining the integrity of concrete construction. Conventional crack detection methods that rely on visual inspection and image processing often produce inconsistent results. U-Net, an architecture often used in image processing, has limitations in crack segmentation, especially regarding the loss function. The main challenge is class imbalance, as cracks usually occupy a much smaller area compared to the background in concrete images. To address this, we developed an automated technique utilizing the U-Net framework with a novel loss function that we named DBCE Loss. Unlike the typical BCED we added the LogCoshDice function to get an improvement so that the resulting loss will be better and can improve the performance of the model. The performance of our method is rigorously evaluated by combining DeepCrack, GAPS, Crack500, and CrackForest datasets to illustrate that the model can detect cracks in various material conditions. DeepCrack represents cracks in concrete with minimal distress, while GAPS represents cracks in asphalt. Crack500 covers cracks with significant distress such as gravel, and CrackForest focuses on small cracks in concrete.The proposed U-Net model achieved Maximum accuracies between 98.58% and 99.22%, Maximum Dice coefficients from 88.27% to 98.03%, and Maximum F1-scores up to 97.11%. The proposed method is 7.69% ahead of the largest comparison method (DICE Loss) on Average IOU, while on Average Precission is leading 6.72% ahead of the largest comparison method (DICE). Then in terms of Recall our method is 8.84% superior to the largest comparison method (BCE). Sera in terms of Average F1-Score is 14.64% ahead of the largest comparison method (DICE). These results show that our method has surpassed conventional loss methods such as BCE, DICE and BCED. This research can facilitate a more reliable infrastructure health monitoring process and help with crack detection in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用U-Net结构和新型DBCE损失函数提高混凝土结构裂缝检测精度
监测基础设施的健康状况对于保持混凝土结构的完整性至关重要。传统的裂纹检测方法依赖于视觉检测和图像处理,往往产生不一致的结果。U-Net是一种常用的图像处理体系结构,但在裂缝分割方面存在一定的局限性,尤其是在损失函数分割方面。主要的挑战是类别不平衡,因为与具体图像中的背景相比,裂缝通常占用更小的区域。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种自动化技术,利用U-Net框架,我们将其命名为DBCE loss。与典型的BCED不同的是,我们添加了LogCoshDice函数来进行改进,这样得到的损失会更好,并且可以提高模型的性能。通过结合DeepCrack、GAPS、Crack500和CrackForest数据集对该方法的性能进行了严格的评估,以说明该模型可以检测各种材料条件下的裂纹。DeepCrack代表混凝土裂缝中最小的裂缝,而GAPS代表沥青裂缝。Crack500覆盖砾石等严重裂缝,而CrackForest专注于混凝土中的小裂缝。U-Net模型的最大准确率在98.58% ~ 99.22%之间,最大Dice系数在88.27% ~ 98.03%之间,最大f1分数达到97.11%。该方法在平均IOU上领先最大比较方法(DICE Loss) 7.69%,而在平均精度上领先最大比较方法(DICE) 6.72%。在召回率方面,我们的方法比最大比较法(BCE)高出8.84%。平均F1-Score比最大比较法(DICE)高出14.64%。这些结果表明,我们的方法超越了传统的损耗方法,如BCE, DICE和BCED。这项研究可以促进更可靠的基础设施健康监测过程,并有助于未来的裂缝检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
期刊最新文献
Named Entity Recognition With Clue-Word Tags From Patent Documents in Materials Science Development of a Neural Network-Based Model to Generate an Absolute Luminance Map of an Interior Using a Camera Raw Image File Reinforcement Learning-Based Fuzzer for 5G RRC Security Evaluation Cite and Seek: Automated Literary Reference Mining at Corpus Scale RSMA-Enabled RIS-Assisted Integrated Sensing and Communication for 6G: A Comprehensive Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1