Evaluation of Electro-chemical Methods in Wastewater Treatment of Wheat Starch Industry

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y
Ehsan Fooladgar, Masoud Taheriyoun, Danial Bakhodaei
{"title":"Evaluation of Electro-chemical Methods in Wastewater Treatment of Wheat Starch Industry","authors":"Ehsan Fooladgar,&nbsp;Masoud Taheriyoun,&nbsp;Danial Bakhodaei","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wastewater from wheat starch industries is the one with high chemical oxygen demand (COD) level that has adverse effects on the environment and thus special attention to its treatment for the discharge limits satisfaction is crucial. Biological treatment methods have challenges such as requiring extensive space and process time, high sludge production, and efficient management and operation demands. To overcome these challenges, electrochemical methods such as electrocoagulation (EC) and electro-Fenton (EF) can be efficient approaches due to their higher process speeds, minimal facility requirements, and easy operation which make them economically viable. In this study, electrochemical processes, including EC and EF methods were applied for wastewater treatment of a wheat starch industry. After preliminary experiments to identify the effective factors and ranges, the response surface method (RSM) was applied to design the experiments. In RSM seven factors were considered including initial COD, pH, electrode distances, process time, temperature, current intensity, and hydrogen peroxide concentration along with the COD removal efficiency as the response. Statistical analysis showed that hydrogen peroxide concentration and initial COD had the most significant impact, while pH had the least effect on COD removal in the electrochemical process. The optimum results showed that for synthetic wastewater with an initial COD range of 2000–4000 mg/L a COD removal of 75–85% for EC and 89–93% removal for EF were obtained. The results were validated for raw natural wastewater with 88% removal for EC and 92% for EF. In conclusion, while the removal efficiency of the EF process was superior to EC, the former incurs higher costs due to the use of hydrogen peroxide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wastewater from wheat starch industries is the one with high chemical oxygen demand (COD) level that has adverse effects on the environment and thus special attention to its treatment for the discharge limits satisfaction is crucial. Biological treatment methods have challenges such as requiring extensive space and process time, high sludge production, and efficient management and operation demands. To overcome these challenges, electrochemical methods such as electrocoagulation (EC) and electro-Fenton (EF) can be efficient approaches due to their higher process speeds, minimal facility requirements, and easy operation which make them economically viable. In this study, electrochemical processes, including EC and EF methods were applied for wastewater treatment of a wheat starch industry. After preliminary experiments to identify the effective factors and ranges, the response surface method (RSM) was applied to design the experiments. In RSM seven factors were considered including initial COD, pH, electrode distances, process time, temperature, current intensity, and hydrogen peroxide concentration along with the COD removal efficiency as the response. Statistical analysis showed that hydrogen peroxide concentration and initial COD had the most significant impact, while pH had the least effect on COD removal in the electrochemical process. The optimum results showed that for synthetic wastewater with an initial COD range of 2000–4000 mg/L a COD removal of 75–85% for EC and 89–93% removal for EF were obtained. The results were validated for raw natural wastewater with 88% removal for EC and 92% for EF. In conclusion, while the removal efficiency of the EF process was superior to EC, the former incurs higher costs due to the use of hydrogen peroxide.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Mesoporous Silica-Polyethyleneimine Composites as High-Capacity Adsorbents for CO2 Adsorption: Isotherm and Thermodynamic Analysis Toxicity Assessment of River Sediments Impacted by Open-Pit Coal Mining in Colombia Using Caenorhabditis elegans Combined Approach Using Soil and Fly Ash Analysis to Understand the Environmental Consequences of Coal Combustion in Thermal Power Stations in the City Advancements in Hybrid and Combined Biological Technologies for Treating Polluted Gases: A Comprehensive Review Remediation of Contaminated Oily Water utilizing Functionalized Composites made from Waste Walnut Shells Loaded on Raw Cotton Fiber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1