Shelter Distribution and Type Affect Space Use of a Desert Reptile

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1002/ece3.70858
Roy C. Averill-Murray, J. Daren Riedle
{"title":"Shelter Distribution and Type Affect Space Use of a Desert Reptile","authors":"Roy C. Averill-Murray,&nbsp;J. Daren Riedle","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal home ranges derive from the distribution of resources across the landscape. For example, home ranges of most tortoise species in the United States revolve around networks of burrows. However, human disturbances that damage shelters can decrease habitat suitability, individual survival, and population persistence. We investigated effects of burrow distribution and availability on space use of the Sonoran Desert Tortoise <i>Gopherus morafkai</i> at two populations with different habitat structures to determine the extent to which habitat capacity is defined by factors subject to management, such as vegetation, relative to more permanent features such as rock shelters. We also demonstrated the superiority of autocorrelated kernel density estimation, illustrating flawed conclusions that could arise from the use of traditional home-range estimators. Home-range size increased with the number of available burrows at both sites. At the Florence Military Reservation (FMR), with numerous caliche caves and few rock burrows, larger home ranges effectively compensated for one third the burrow density as that of Sugarloaf Mountain, which predominantly featured rock burrows. Female tortoises had smaller home ranges than males despite having similar burrow densities. Females revisited individual burrows more often than males at Sugarloaf, which may relate to female use of preferred nesting sites; however, lower availability led males to revisit burrows at similar rates as females at FMR. Pairs of tortoises at FMR shared 72% more burrows than pairs at Sugarloaf, and pairs of females shared 33% fewer burrows than female–male pairs across both sites. Space and burrow use at FMR and Sugarloaf are consistent with predictions of how animals choose patches for their home ranges in ways that are optimal with respect to spatially distributed resources. Populations largely reliant on pallets or soil burrows may be more subject to declines due to anthropogenic impacts from grazing or off-highway vehicle use or due to increasing temperatures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.70858","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal home ranges derive from the distribution of resources across the landscape. For example, home ranges of most tortoise species in the United States revolve around networks of burrows. However, human disturbances that damage shelters can decrease habitat suitability, individual survival, and population persistence. We investigated effects of burrow distribution and availability on space use of the Sonoran Desert Tortoise Gopherus morafkai at two populations with different habitat structures to determine the extent to which habitat capacity is defined by factors subject to management, such as vegetation, relative to more permanent features such as rock shelters. We also demonstrated the superiority of autocorrelated kernel density estimation, illustrating flawed conclusions that could arise from the use of traditional home-range estimators. Home-range size increased with the number of available burrows at both sites. At the Florence Military Reservation (FMR), with numerous caliche caves and few rock burrows, larger home ranges effectively compensated for one third the burrow density as that of Sugarloaf Mountain, which predominantly featured rock burrows. Female tortoises had smaller home ranges than males despite having similar burrow densities. Females revisited individual burrows more often than males at Sugarloaf, which may relate to female use of preferred nesting sites; however, lower availability led males to revisit burrows at similar rates as females at FMR. Pairs of tortoises at FMR shared 72% more burrows than pairs at Sugarloaf, and pairs of females shared 33% fewer burrows than female–male pairs across both sites. Space and burrow use at FMR and Sugarloaf are consistent with predictions of how animals choose patches for their home ranges in ways that are optimal with respect to spatially distributed resources. Populations largely reliant on pallets or soil burrows may be more subject to declines due to anthropogenic impacts from grazing or off-highway vehicle use or due to increasing temperatures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
庇护所分布和类型对沙漠爬行动物空间利用的影响
动物的栖息地范围取决于整个景观的资源分布。例如,在美国,大多数龟类的栖息地都围绕着洞穴网络。然而,破坏庇护所的人为干扰会降低栖息地的适宜性、个体存活率和种群持久性。本文研究了索诺兰沙漠陆龟(Sonoran Desert Tortoise Gopherus morafkai)两个生境结构不同的种群的洞穴分布和可利用性对其空间利用的影响,以确定生境容量在多大程度上是由植被等管理因素决定的,而不是由岩石庇护所等更永久的特征决定的。我们还证明了自相关核密度估计的优越性,说明了使用传统的主场距离估计器可能产生的错误结论。家园范围的大小随着两个地点可用洞穴的数量而增加。在佛罗伦斯军事保留区(FMR),有许多岩洞和很少的岩洞,较大的住宅范围有效地补偿了三分之一的洞穴密度,因为糖面包山主要以岩洞为特征。尽管有相似的洞穴密度,雌龟的家庭范围比雄龟小。在Sugarloaf,雌性比雄性更频繁地重新访问单个洞穴,这可能与雌性使用首选筑巢地点有关;然而,较低的可利用性导致雄性在FMR中以与雌性相似的速度重新访问洞穴。在FMR的成对龟比在Sugarloaf的成对龟共享72%的洞穴,在两个地点,雌龟比雌龟共享33%的洞穴。FMR和Sugarloaf的空间和洞穴使用与动物如何以空间分布资源的最佳方式为其家园范围选择斑块的预测一致。由于放牧或非公路车辆使用的人为影响,或由于气温升高,主要依赖托盘或土壤洞穴的人口可能更容易下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
期刊最新文献
Addressing a Flat-Out Problem: Environmental DNA (eDNA) Exposes Silent Infestations of Acropora-Eating Flatworms (Prosthiostomum acroporae) in Coral Aquaculture. Thermal Ecology of a Central Anatolian Population of Ophisops elegans: Insights From Field Measurements and Microclimate Modeling. Clutch Destruction by Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) During the Laying Stage of Vinous-Throated Parrotbills (Sinosuthora webbiana): First Video Evidence. Diet-Driven Divergence in Gut Microbiota Variation Between Two Sympatric Gerbil Species. Combining Time-Stamped Insect Sampling With eDNA-Metabarcoding of Guano to Reconstruct Community Interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1