Effect of carryover biomass of channel catfish on production and profitability in intensively aerated multiple-batch system

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Journal of The World Aquaculture Society Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1111/jwas.13123
Ganesh Kumar, Shraddha Hegde, Suja Aarattuthodi, Brian Bosworth, Lianqun Sun, Nathanial Steensma
{"title":"Effect of carryover biomass of channel catfish on production and profitability in intensively aerated multiple-batch system","authors":"Ganesh Kumar,&nbsp;Shraddha Hegde,&nbsp;Suja Aarattuthodi,&nbsp;Brian Bosworth,&nbsp;Lianqun Sun,&nbsp;Nathanial Steensma","doi":"10.1111/jwas.13123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple-batch production is the most common farming strategy for raising channel catfish. Increased adoption of intensified alternative production practices has changed the cost structure of many catfish production practices including multiple-batch systems. Production efficiency in multiple-batch production can be enhanced by providing optimal stocking recommendations for fingerlings and carryover fish. Twelve 0.4-ha ponds were understocked with 20,782 channel catfish fingerlings (mean weight = 30 g/fish) at three different carryover biomass rates (3440; 4580; and 5702 kg/ha). Fish were fed once daily to apparent satiation with a 28% protein floating feed, and ponds were aerated with a 7.4-kW electric paddlewheel aerator. Gross, net, daily net yields, sub-marketable yields (&lt;0.54 kg), growth (g/day), and survival were statistically similar among the three treatments, but yield of marketable fish yield (fish ≥0.54 kg) increased significantly with increased carryover biomass. The cost of production was reduced while net returns increased with increased carryover biomass. The lowest carryover biomass treatment (3440 kg/ha) had negative cash flow and net returns when sub-marketable fish were not assigned value. However, all three carryover biomass treatments attained positive annual net cash flows and net returns when sub-marketable fish were valued as revenue, the two higher carryover biomass treatments (4580 and 5702 kg/ha) outperformed the low carryover biomass treatment (3440 kg/ha). This study indicates channel catfish carryover biomass rates should be between 4580 and 5702 kg/ha to improve cost efficiency in intensively aerated, multiple-batch production systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwas.13123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwas.13123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple-batch production is the most common farming strategy for raising channel catfish. Increased adoption of intensified alternative production practices has changed the cost structure of many catfish production practices including multiple-batch systems. Production efficiency in multiple-batch production can be enhanced by providing optimal stocking recommendations for fingerlings and carryover fish. Twelve 0.4-ha ponds were understocked with 20,782 channel catfish fingerlings (mean weight = 30 g/fish) at three different carryover biomass rates (3440; 4580; and 5702 kg/ha). Fish were fed once daily to apparent satiation with a 28% protein floating feed, and ponds were aerated with a 7.4-kW electric paddlewheel aerator. Gross, net, daily net yields, sub-marketable yields (<0.54 kg), growth (g/day), and survival were statistically similar among the three treatments, but yield of marketable fish yield (fish ≥0.54 kg) increased significantly with increased carryover biomass. The cost of production was reduced while net returns increased with increased carryover biomass. The lowest carryover biomass treatment (3440 kg/ha) had negative cash flow and net returns when sub-marketable fish were not assigned value. However, all three carryover biomass treatments attained positive annual net cash flows and net returns when sub-marketable fish were valued as revenue, the two higher carryover biomass treatments (4580 and 5702 kg/ha) outperformed the low carryover biomass treatment (3440 kg/ha). This study indicates channel catfish carryover biomass rates should be between 4580 and 5702 kg/ha to improve cost efficiency in intensively aerated, multiple-batch production systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the World Aquaculture Society is an international scientific journal publishing original research on the culture of aquatic plants and animals including: Nutrition; Disease; Genetics and breeding; Physiology; Environmental quality; Culture systems engineering; Husbandry practices; Economics and marketing.
期刊最新文献
Effects of dietary citric acid, lactic acid, and potassium sorbate mixture on growth performance and intestinal immunological parameters in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) juveniles Effects of different seedstrings on the nursery of Pyropia yezoensis Impact of higher temperatures on yolk sac absorption and early development in hybrid catfish between Clarias gariepinus and C. macrocephalus Emergence of Aeromonas dhakensis-linked motile Aeromonas septicemia in Pangasius hypophthalmus biofloc systems in Pakistan Dynamics of soil properties and pathogen levels in Pacific white shrimp ponds during a production cycle: Implications for aquaculture management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1